Skip to main content

An Effective Approach to Finding a Context Path in Review Texts Using Pathfinder Scaling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10046))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2961 Accesses

Abstract

Customer reviews feature opinions or sentiments that a review writer has given, and these opinions or sentiments have an impact on the reader. Identifying and presenting word associations that indicate a sentiment orientation and semantics can aid in selecting the best review for providing the information customers are seeking. In this paper, we attempted to discover the context structure and the context path presenting explicit semantics in review texts. To this end, we extracted word co-occurrences and converted them to a cosine adjacency matrix. Then a co-word network applied by Pathfinder scaling was constructed. Finally, we measured the context score and presented context paths from the context structure in the review texts. In results, our approach found that a compound noun is easy to detect by network analysis. The extracted context paths remain intact, a sentiment polarity derived from review texts. The evaluative expression for a certain aspect of a product or service is clearer and more specified within the context path. Furthermore, it is not necessary to train reference words to detect the sentiment orientations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.yelp.com/dataset_challenge .

  2. 2.

    http://nlp.stanford.edu/ .

  3. 3.

    https://neo4j.com/ .

References

  1. Ghose, A., Ipeirotis, P.G.: Designing novel review ranking systems: predicting the usefulness and impact of reviews. In: 9th International Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 303–310. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hu, X., Downie, J.S., West, K., Ehmann, A.: Mining music reviews: promising preliminary results. In: 6th International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Titov, I., McDonald, R.: Modeling online reviews with multi-grain topic models. In: 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 111–120. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hatzivassiloglou, V., McKeown, K.R.: Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In: 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 174–181 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Turney, P.D.: Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 417–424 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Turney, P.D., Littman, M.L.: Measuring praise and criticism: inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS) 21(4), 315–346 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xia, R., Xu, F., Yu, J., Qi, Y., Cambria, E.: Polarity shift detection, elimination and ensemble: a three-stage model for document-level sentiment analysis. Inf. Process. Manag. 52(1), 36–45 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pang, B., Lee, L., Vaithyanathan, S.: Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In: ACL 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 10, pp. 79–86 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ye, Q., Zhang, Z., Law, R.: Sentiment classification of online reviews to travel destinations by supervised machine learning approaches. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(3), 6527–6535 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dave, K., Lawrence, S., Pennock, D.M.: Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In: 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 519–528. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jin, W., Ho, H.H., Srihari, R.K.: OpinionMiner: a novel machine learning system for web opinion mining and extraction. In: 15th ACM SIGKDD, pp. 1195–1204. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Choi, Y., Cardie, C., Riloff, E., Patwardhan, S.: Identifying sources of opinions with conditional random fields and extraction patterns. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 355–362 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schvaneveldt, R.W., Durso, F.T., Dearholt, D.W.: Network structures in proximity data. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 24, 249–284 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mei, Q., Ling, X., Wondra, M., Su, H., Zhai, C.: Topic sentiment mixture: modeling facets and opinions in weblogs. In: 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 171–180. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jo, Y., Oh, A.H.: Aspect and sentiment unification model for online review analysis. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 815–824. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Börner, K., Chen, C., Boyack, K.W.: Visualizing knowledge domains. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 37(1), 179–255 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McCain, K.W.: The structure of biotechnology R&D. Scientometrics 32(2), 153–175 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, C.: Visualising semantic spaces and author co-citation networks in digital libraries. Inf. Process. Manag. 35(3), 401–420 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. White, H.D.: Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: a remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 54(5), 423–434 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. White, H.D., McCain, K.W.: Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 49(4), 327–355 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sun, J., Tang, J.: A survey of models and algorithms for social influence analysis. In: Social Network Data Analytics, pp. 177–214 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015S1A3A2046711).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin Hea-Jin Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kim, E.HJ., Kim, S. (2016). An Effective Approach to Finding a Context Path in Review Texts Using Pathfinder Scaling. In: Spiro, E., Ahn, YY. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10046. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47879-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47880-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics