Skip to main content

Decomposing Drama Management in Educational Interactive Narrative: A Modular Reinforcement Learning Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Interactive Storytelling (ICIDS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10045))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recent years have seen growing interest in data-driven approaches to personalized interactive narrative generation and drama management. Reinforcement learning (RL) shows particular promise for training policies to dynamically shape interactive narratives based on corpora of player-interaction data. An important open question is how to design reinforcement learning-based drama managers in order to make effective use of player interaction data, which is often expensive to gather and sparse relative to the vast state and action spaces required by drama management. We investigate an offline optimization framework for training modular reinforcement learning-based drama managers in an educational interactive narrative, Crystal Island. We leverage importance sampling to evaluate drama manager policies derived from different decompositional representations of the interactive narrative. Empirical results show significant improvements in drama manager quality from adopting an optimized modular RL decomposition compared to competing representations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There are 13 AESs in Crystal Island. In this work, we focus on four AESs, which were chosen because they were the most commonly occurring in our training corpus.

References

  1. Rowe, J., Lester, J.: Improving student problem solving in narrative-centered learning environments: a modular reinforcement learning framework. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M.F. (eds.) 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. LNCS, vol. 9112, pp. 419–428. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, S., Rowe, J., Mott, B., Lester, J.: A supervised learning framework for modeling director agent strategies in educational interactive narrative. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 6, 203–215 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li, B., Lee-Urban, S., Johnston, G., Riedl, M.: Story generation with crowdsourced plot graphs. In: 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 598–604 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yu, H., Riedl, M.: Personalized interactive narratives via sequential recommendation of plot points. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 6(2), 174–187 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Orkin, J., Roy, D.: Understanding speech in interactive narratives with crowd sourced data. In: 8th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, pp. 57–62 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson, M., Roberts, D., Isbell, Jr., C., Mateas, M.: Reinforcement learning for declarative optimization-based drama management. In: 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 775–782 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roberts, D., Nelson, M., Isbell, C., Mateas, M., Littman, M.: Targeting specific distributions of trajectories in MDPs. In: 21st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1213–1218 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thue, D., Bulitko, V.: Procedural game adaptation: framing experience management as changing an MDP. In: Fifth Workshop on Intelligent Narrative Technologies, pp. 44–50 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rowe, J., Mott, B., Lester, J.: Optimizing player experience in interactive narrative planning: a modular reinforcement learning approach. In: 10th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, pp. 160–166. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sutton, R., Barto, A.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Peshkin, L., Shelton, C.: Learning from scarce experience. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 498–505 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Riedl, M., Bulitko, V.: Interactive narrative: an intelligent systems approach. AI Mag. 34(1), 67–77 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McCoy, J. Treanor, M., Samuel, B., Mateas, M., Wardrip-Fruin, N.: Prom week: social physics as gameplay. In: 6th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games, pp. 319–321 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Suttie, N., Louchart, S., Aylett, R., Lim, T.: Theoretical considerations towards authoring emergent narrative. In: Koenitz, H., Sezen, T.I., Ferri, G., Haahr, M., Sezen, D., Catak, G. (eds.) ICIDS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8230, pp. 205–216. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Porteous, J., Lindsay, A., Read, J., Truran, M., Cavazza. M.: Automated extension of narrative planning domains with antonymic operators. In: 14th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 1547–1555 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Robertson, J., Young, R.: Automated gameplay generation from declarative world representations. In: 11th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, pp. 72–78 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lamstein, A., Mateas, M.: Search-based drama management. In: 2004 AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game Artificial Intelligence, pp. 103–107 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Singh, S.: Transfer of learning by composing solutions of elemental sequential tasks. Mach. Learn. 8, 323–339 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Dietterich, T.: Hierarchical reinforcement learning with the MAXQ value function decomposition. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 13, 227–303 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Chi, M., VanLehn, K., Litman, D., Jordan, P.: Empirically evaluating the application of reinforcement learning to the induction of effective and adaptive pedagogical strategies. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 21, 137–180 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mandel, T., Liu, Y., Levine, S., Brunskill, E., Popovic, Z.: Offline policy evaluation across representations with applications to educational games. In: 13th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 1077–1084 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Riezler, S., Maxwell, J.: On some pitfalls in automatic evaluation and significance testing for MT. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization, pp. 57–64 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pengcheng Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, P., Rowe, J., Mott, B., Lester, J. (2016). Decomposing Drama Management in Educational Interactive Narrative: A Modular Reinforcement Learning Approach. In: Nack, F., Gordon, A. (eds) Interactive Storytelling. ICIDS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10045. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48279-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48279-8_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48278-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48279-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics