Skip to main content

Serious Educational Games’ Ontologies: A Survey and Comparison

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2016 (AISI 2016)

Abstract

Serious Educational Games (SEGs) are games not having a mere purpose of entertainment. They benefit from the main characteristics of games, such as engagement and immersiveness to achieve pedagogic objectives. In spite of the promising results of SEGs reported in the literature, their analysis and design still require complex tasks that incorporate game design activities within an educational context. Ontologies that include concepts, relations, and governing rules for both games and education domains could offer an approach to solve such problem. An ontology, as a domain modeling tool, could be used as a meta-model to guide a SEG designer, in addition to bridging the communication gap between the game design and pedagogic domains. This paper presents a survey of available ontologies for SEGs in the literature, in addition to comparing them. We managed to find only two SEGs’ ontologies and a meta-model in the literature, and hence presented and compared them. After presenting the survey, and result analysis and general comparison, we followed an ontologies’ comparison method called OntoMetric for further evaluation of the current SEGs’ ontologies. Our research results revealed that SEGs’ ontologies in the literature have two main diverse perspectives. One perspective intensively focuses on the game domain concepts, and the other perspective focuses on the pedagogic domain concepts. In addition, there is little proof that a comprehensive web-based SEGs ontology, which is characterized by completion, consistency, and reusability exists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abt, C.: Serious Games. Viking Press, New York (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A.: Designing effective serious games: opportunities and challenges for research. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. (iJET) 5, 22–35 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gee, J.P.: Learning and games. In: Katie, S. (ed.) The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning, pp. 21–39. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyle, E.A., Hainey, T., Connolly, T.M., Gray, G., Earp, J., Ott, M., Lim, T., Ninaus, M., Ribeiro, C., Pereira, J.: An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Comput. Educ. 94, 178–192 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mayer, I., Bekebrede, G., Harteveld, C., Warmelink, H., Zhou, Q., Ruijven, Tv, Lo, J., Kortmann, R., Wenzler, I.: The research and evaluation of serious games: toward a comprehensive methodology. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 45(3), 502–527 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dormans, J.: The effectiveness and efficiency of model driven game design. In: Herrlich, M., Malaka, R., Masuch, M. (eds.) ICEC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7522, pp. 542–548. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33542-6_71

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Corcho, O., Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Ontological engineering: principles, methods, tools and languages. In: Calero, C., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M. (eds.) Ontologies for Software Engineering and Software Technology, pp. 1–48. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Castaneda, V., Ballejos, L., Caliusco, M., Galli, M.: The use of ontologies in requirements engineering. Glob. J. Res. Eng. 10(6), 2–8 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Keele, S.: Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Software Engineering Group School of Computer Science and Mathematics Keele University, and Department of Computer Science University of Durham, Durham (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lozano-Tello, A., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Ontometric: a method to choose the appropriate ontology. J. Database Manage. 2(15), 1–18 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo, H., Trætteberg, H., Wang, A.I., Gao, S.: PerGO: an ontology towards model driven pervasive game development. In: Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM 2014 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 8842, pp. 651–654. Springer, Berlin (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45550-0_67

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reyno, E., Carsí, J.Á.: A platform-independent model for videogame gameplay specification. In: Proceedings of the 4th Digital Games Research Association Conference (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tang, S., Hanneghan, M.: Game content model: an ontology for documenting serious game design. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 4th International Conference on Developments in E-systems Engineering (DeSE), Dubai, UAE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Raies, K., Khemaja, M.: Towards ontology of gameplay: application to game based learning systems. In: Proceedings of the Second AIM Research Day on Serious Games and Innovation (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Longstreet, C.S., Cooper, K.M.L.: Developing a meta-model for serious games in higher education. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Rome, Italy, (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gagne, R.: The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction, 2nd edn. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Frasca, G.: Simulation versus narrative. In: Perron, B., Wolf, M.J.P. (eds.) The Video Game Theory Reader, pp. 221–235. Routledge, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Adams, E.: Fundamentals of Game Design, 2nd edn. Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Noy, N., McGuinness, D.: Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Technical report, SMI-2001-0880, Knowldege Systems Laboratory, Stanford University (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, 1st edn. Longmans, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P., Raths, J., Wittrock, M.C.: A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, 1st edn. Longman, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lozano-Tello, A.: Métrica de Idoneidad de Ontologías, Ph.D. thesis, University of Extremadura, Madrid (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed M. Abou Elfotouh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abou Elfotouh, A.M., Nasr, E.S., Gheith, M.H. (2017). Serious Educational Games’ Ontologies: A Survey and Comparison. In: Hassanien, A., Shaalan, K., Gaber, T., Azar, A., Tolba, M. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2016. AISI 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 533. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48308-5_70

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48308-5_70

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48307-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48308-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics