Skip to main content

Applicability of 3DVE Indicator for Cultural Heritage Landscape Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection (EuroMed 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10058))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 4569 Accesses

Abstract

Uniformly control of the height of buildings owned by individuals to protect cultural heritage landscape causes social conflicts. Thus, it is necessary to introduce an indicator that can simultaneously evaluate the criteria for control of the height of buildings (CCBH) for urban development and cultural heritage landscape management. We developed 3D Visual Exposure (3DVE) as a useful indicator to review the validity of the CCBH around cultural heritage. By using the 3DVE, it was possible to calculate visibility and we succeeded in mapping the opportunity of view on 3D geospatial information and evaluating landscape variation with statistics through changing building heights around cultural heritage. We predict that the 3DVE presented in this study will have high utilization as an indicator for the cultural heritage landscape management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In order to calculate the visibility quickly, multiple ‘points’ should be selected from the important parts of the object (We call this ‘target point’). Since no more than two sides of a building are seen simultaneously, target points were calculated with 884, ½ of the 1,769 target points extracted.

References

  1. Archea, J.C.: Visual access and exposure: an architectural basis for interpersonal behavior. Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Quintrand, P., Zoller, J., de Fillppo, R., Faure, S.: A model for the representation of urban knowledge. Environ. Plan. 18(1), 71–83 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rabie, J.: Towards the simulation of urban morphology. Environ. Plan. 18(1), 57–70 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zacharias, J.: Preferences for view corridors through the urban environment. Landscape Urban Plann. 43(4), 217–225 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Sulivan, D., Turner, A.: Visibility graphs and landscape visibility analysis. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 15(3), 221–237 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Turner, A., Doxa, M., O’Sullivan, D., Penn, A.: From isovists to visibility graphs: a methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environ. Plan. 28(1), 103–121 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schroder, C. J.: Quantifying urban visibility using 3D space syntax: Technical report, Unpublished MSc thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, P.P., Putra, S.Y., Li, W.: Viewsphere-a GIS-based 3D visibility analysis for urban design evaluation. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 34(6), 971–992 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bartie, P., Reitsma, F., Kingham, S., Mills, S.: Advancing visibility modelling algorithms for urban environments. Environ. Urban Syst. 34(6), 518–531 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Domon, G.: Landscape as resource: consequences, challenges and opportunities for rural development. Landscape Urban Plann. 100(1), 338–340 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jorgensen, A.: Beyond the view: future directions in landscape aesthetics research. Landscape Urban Plann. 100(1), 353–355 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Domingo-Santos, J., Villarán, R.F., Rapp-Arrarás, Í., Provens, E.C.: The visual exposure in forest and rural landscapes: an algorithm and a GIS tool. Landscape Urban Plann. 101(1), 52–58 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kirkpatrick, J.B., Daniels, G.D., Davison, A.: Temporal and spatial variation in garden and street trees in six eastern australian cities. Landscape Urban Plann. 101(3), 244–252 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Park, B., Furuya, K., Kasetani, T., Takayama, N., Kagawa, T., Miyazaki, Y.: Relationship between psychological responses and physical environments in forest settings. Landscape Urban Plann. 102(1), 24–32 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anastasopoulos, P., Islam, M., Perperidou, D., Karlaftis, M.: Hazard-based analysis of travel distance in urban environments: longitudinal data approach. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 138(1), 53–61 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng, Z., Bohong, Z.: Study on spatial structure of Yangtze river delta urban agglomeration and its effects on urban and rural regions. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 138(1), 78–89 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. An, K., Ko, H., Kim, C.: Development and implementation of visual exposure indicator for residential development. Int. J. Smart Home 9(2), 1–10 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, C., Ko, H., An, K.: Development and 3D visibility analysis models using NURBS in a residential development. Int. J. Smart Home 9(1), 151–160 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jie, H., Tsou, J.: GIS-based visual perception analysis of urban natural landscape for urban planning supporting: a case study of Jinzishan Hill region. In: 19th eCAADe Conference Proceedings, pp. 505–510. eCAADe Press, Helsinki (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schroder, C., Mackaness, W., Reitsma, F.: Quantifying urban visibility using 3D space syntax. In: Geographical Information Science Research UK Conference, pp. 359–366. GISRUK Press, Kildare (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaeyong Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lee, J., Kim, Y. (2016). Applicability of 3DVE Indicator for Cultural Heritage Landscape Management. In: Ioannides, M., et al. Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection. EuroMed 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10058. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48496-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48496-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48495-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48496-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics