Skip to main content

Sharing Is Caring, or Callous?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cryptology and Network Security (CANS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 10052))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2029 Accesses

Abstract

The practice of third-party applications (social apps) on social networks sites (SNSs) to collect information about users’ friends has raised awareness of the problem known as interdependent privacy. Although studies have quantified the value which app users place on their friends’ personal information, i.e., interdependent privacy value, few have investigated factors that affect the valuation of interdependent privacy. In particular, research indicates that social capital, which is an immaterial resource that can yield positive social outcomes, plays an important role in individuals’ decision-making. Motivated by these works, we study the complex and yet undetermined relationship between interdependent privacy value and social capital. In addition, in order to gain a thorough understanding of interdependent privacy valuation, our study also examines its relationships with factors such as app data collection context (i.e., whether or not data collection is relevant to app performance), individuals’ number of friends within SNSs, and demographics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Biczók, G., Chia, P.H.: Interdependent privacy: let me share your data. In: Sadeghi, A.-R. (ed.) FC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7859, pp. 338–353. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39884-1_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Burke, M., Kraut, R., Marlow, C.: Social capital on Facebook: differentiating uses and users. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 571–580. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burke, M., Marlow, C., Lento, T.: Social network activity and social well-being. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1909–1912. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chessa, M., Grossklags, J., Loiseau, P.: A game-theoretic study on non-monetary incentives in data analytics projects with privacy implications. In: Proceedings of the 28th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF), pp. 90–104 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coleman, J.: Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94, S95–S120 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C.: The benefits of Facebook friends: social capital and college students use of online social network sites. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 12(4), 1143–1168 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C.: Connection strategies: social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media Soc. 13(6), 873–892 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ellison, N., Vitak, J., Steinfield, C., Gray, R., Lampe, C.: Negotiating privacy concerns and social capital needs in a social media environment. In: Privacy Online: Perspectives on Privacy and Self-disclosure in the Social Web, pp. 19–32 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Humbert, M., Ayday, E., Hubaux, J.-P., Telenti, A.: On non-cooperative genomic privacy. In: Böhme, R., Okamoto, T. (eds.) FC 2015. LNCS, vol. 8975, pp. 407–426. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-47854-7_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Nissenbaum, H.: Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Rev. 79(1), 119–157 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Olteanu, A.M., Huguenin, K., Shokri, R., Humbert, M., Hubaux, J.P.: Quantifying interdependent privacy risks with location data. Rapport LAAS n16018 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paxton, P.: Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. Am. J. Sociol. 105(1), 88–127 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pu, Y., Grossklags, J.: An economic model and simulation results of app adoption decisions on networks with interdependent privacy consequences. In: Poovendran, R., Saad, W. (eds.) GameSec 2014. LNCS, vol. 8840, pp. 246–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12601-2_14

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pu, Y., Grossklags, J.: Towards a model on the factors influencing social app users valuation of interdependent privacy. Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. 2016(2), 61–81 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pu, Y., Grossklags, J.: Using conjoint analysis to investigate the value of interdependent privacy in social app adoption scenarios. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Putnam, R.: Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith, J., Milberg, S., Burke, S.: Information privacy: measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS Q. 20(2), 167–196 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J., Ellison, N., Lampe, C.: Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C & T), pp. 245–254 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stutzman, F., Vitak, J., Ellison, N., Gray, R., Lampe, C.: Privacy in interaction: exploring disclosure and social capital in Facebook. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Turow, J., Hoofnagle, C., Mulligan, D., Good, N., Grossklags, J.: The Federal Trade Commission and consumer privacy in the coming decade. I/S J. Law Policy Inf. Soc. 3(3), 723–749 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, N., Wisniewski, P., Xu, H., Grossklags, J.: Designing the default privacy settings for Facebook applications. In: Companion Publication of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), pp. 249–252 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Williams, D.: On and off the ’net: scales for social capital in an online era. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 11(2), 593–628 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. All remaining errors are our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Pu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pu, Y., Grossklags, J. (2016). Sharing Is Caring, or Callous?. In: Foresti, S., Persiano, G. (eds) Cryptology and Network Security. CANS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10052. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48965-0_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48965-0_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48964-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48965-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics