Skip to main content

Evaluation of Kano-like Models Defined for Using Data Extracted from Online Sources

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10027))

Abstract

The Kano model is a frequently used method to classify user preferences according to their importance, and by doing so support requirements prioritization. To implement the Kano model, a representative set of users must answer for each feature under evaluation a functional and dysfunctional question. Unfortunately, finding and interviewing users is difficult and time-consuming. Thus, the core idea of our proposed approach is to extract automatically opinions about product features from online open sources (e.g., Q & A sites, App reviews, etc.) and to feed them into the Kano questionnaire to prioritize software requirements following the principles of the Kano model. One problem with our proposed approach is how to pair input extracted from the internet into paired answers to the functional dysfunctional questions. This problem arises because the reviews and comments from online sources that we plan to transform into answers to either the functional or dysfunctional question are usually unpaired. Therefore, the aim of this study is to find a method that produces results resembling those of the traditional Kano model although we only retrieve partial information. We propose two Kano-like models, i.e., the Half- and the Deformed-Kano model, for unpaired answers to functional and dysfunctional questions. In order to analyze the performance of the two proposed models as compared to that of the traditional Kano model, we run several simulations with synthetic data. Then we compare the simulation results to see which Kano-like model produces results that are similar to those of the traditional Kano model. The simulation results show that on average both the Half-Kano and Deformed-Kano models on average generate feature categorizations similar to those of the traditional Kano model. However, only the Deformed-Kano model generates the same range of categorizations as the traditional Kano model. The Deformed-Kano can be used as an approximation of the traditional Kano model when the input is unpaired or partly missing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    O = One-dimensional Quality, A = Attractive Quality, M = Must-be Quality, I = Indifferent Quality, R = Reverse Quality.

  2. 2.

    \( C_{5}^{1} \, + \,C_{5}^{2} \, + \,C_{5}^{3} \, + \,C_{5}^{4} \, + \,C_{5}^{5} \, = \,31 \).

References

  1. Lehtola, L., Kauppinen, M., Kujala, S.: Requirements prioritization challenges in practice. In: Bomarius, F., Iida, H. (eds.) PROFES 2004. LNCS, vol. 3009, pp. 497–508. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24659-6_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Berander, P., Andrews, A.: Requirements prioritization. In: Aurum, A., Wohlin, C. (eds.) Engineering and Managing Software Requirements, pp. 69–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Kano, N., Nobuhiku, S., Fumio, T., Shinichi, T.: Attractive quality and must-be quality. J. Jpn. Soc. Qual. Control 14(2), 39–48 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berger, C., Blauth, R., Boger, D., Bolster, C., Burchill, G., DuMouchel, W., Timko, M.: Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality. Center Qual. Manage. J. 2(4), 3–35 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jiao, J.R., Chen, C.H.: Customer requirement management in product development: a review of research issues. Concurrent Eng. 14(3), 173–185 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kai, Y.: Voice of the Customer: Capture and Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sharif Ullah, A.M.M., Tamaki, J.I.: Analysis of Kano-model-based customer needs for product development. Syst. Eng. 14(2), 154–172 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. http://foldingburritos.com/kano-model/. Accessed 15 June 2016

  9. Mikulic, J., Prebezac, D.: A critical review of techniques for classifying quality attributes in the Kano model. Managing Serv. Qual. An Intl. J. 21(1), 46–66 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brandt, R.D.: A procedure for identifying value-enhancing service components using customer satisfaction survey data. In: Surprenant, C. (ed.) Add Value to Your Service, pp. 61–65. American Marketing Association, Chicago (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vavra, T.G.: Improving Your Measurement of Customer Satisfaction: A Guide to Creating, Conducting, Analyzing, and Reporting Customer Satisfaction Measurement Programs. ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cadotte, E.R., Turgeon, N.: Dissatisfiers and satisfiers: suggestions from consumer complaints and compliments. J. Consum. Satisfaction Dissatisfaction Complaining Behav. 1, 74–79 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oliver, R.L.: Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. McGraw-Hill Series in Marketing Show all Parts in this Series. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Friman, M., Edvardsson, B.: A content analysis of complaints and compliments. Managing Serv. Qual. Intl. J. 13(1), 20–26 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Emery, C.R., Tian, R.G.: Schoolwork as products, professors as customers: a practical teaching approach in business education. J. Educ. Bus. 78(2), 97–102 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Estonian Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dietmar Pfahl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yin, H., Pfahl, D. (2016). Evaluation of Kano-like Models Defined for Using Data Extracted from Online Sources. In: Abrahamsson, P., Jedlitschka, A., Nguyen Duc, A., Felderer, M., Amasaki, S., Mikkonen, T. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10027. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49093-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49094-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics