Skip to main content

Value at Risk for Risk Evaluation in Information Retrieval

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Natural Language Understanding and Intelligent Applications (ICCPOL 2016, NLPCC 2016)

Abstract

In Information Retrieval (IR), evaluation metrics continuously play an important role. Recently, some risk measures have been proposed to evaluate the downside performance or the performance variance of an assumingly advanced IR method in comparison with a baseline method. In this paper, we propose a novel risk metric, by applying the Value at Risk theory (VaR, which has been widely used in financial investment) to IR risk evaluation. The proposed metric (VaR_IR) is implemented in the light of typical IR effectiveness metrics (e.g. AP) and used to evaluate the participating systems submitted to Session Tracks and compared with other risk metrics. The empirical evaluation has shown that VaR_IR is complementary to and can be integrated with the effectiveness metrics to provide a more comprehensive evaluation method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amati, G., Carpineto, C., Romano, G.: Query difficulty, robustness, and selective application of query expansion. In: McDonald, S., Tait, J. (eds.) ECIR 2004. LNCS, vol. 2997, pp. 127–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24752-4_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Collins-Thompson, K.: Reducing the risk of query expansion via robust constrained optimization. In: Proceedings of CIKM 2009, pp. 837–846. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Collins-Thompson, K., Macdonald, C., Bennett, P., Diaz, F., Voorhees, E.M.: Trec 2014 web track overview. Technical report, DTIC Document (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Linsmeier, T.J., Pearson, N.D.: Value at risk. Financ. Anal. J. 56(2), 47–67 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Morgan, J.: Riskmetrics: Technical Document. Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robertson, S.E.: The probability ranking principle in IR. J. Documentation 33, 294–304 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van Rijsbergen, C.J.: Information Retrieval. Butterworths, Oxford (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhai, C., Lafferty, J.D.: A risk minimization framework for information retrieval. Inf. Process. Manag. 42(1), 31–55 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, P., Song, D., Wang, J., Hou, Y.: Bias-variance decomposition of IR evaluation. In: Proceedings of SIGIR, vol. 2013, pp. 1021–1024 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented in this paper is sponsored in part by the Chinese National Program on Key Basic Research Project (973 Program, grant No. 2013CB329304, 2014CB744604), the Chinese 863 Program (grant No. 2015AA015403), the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 61402324, 61272265), and the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (grant No. 20130032120044).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, M., Zhang, P., Song, D., Wang, J. (2016). Value at Risk for Risk Evaluation in Information Retrieval. In: Lin, CY., Xue, N., Zhao, D., Huang, X., Feng, Y. (eds) Natural Language Understanding and Intelligent Applications. ICCPOL NLPCC 2016 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10102. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50496-4_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50496-4_56

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50495-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50496-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics