Skip to main content

Exploring Various Linguistic Features for Stance Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Natural Language Understanding and Intelligent Applications (ICCPOL 2016, NLPCC 2016)

Abstract

In this paper, we describe our participation in the fourth shared task (NLPCC-ICCPOL 2016 Shared Task 4) on the stance detection in Chinese Micro-blogs (subtask A). Different from ordinary features, we explore four linguistic features including lexical features, morphology features, semantic features and syntax features in Chinese micro-blogs in stance classifier, and get a good performance, which ranks the third place among sixteen systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://tcci.ccf.org.cn/conference/2016/pages/page05_CFPTasks.html.

  2. 2.

    https://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm/.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/fxsjy/jieba/.

  4. 4.

    http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/lex-parser.shtml.

  5. 5.

    http://tcci.ccf.org.cn/conference/2016/dldoc/evagline4.pdf.

References

  1. Thomas, M., Pang, B., Lee, L.: Get out the vote: determining support or opposition from congressional floor-debate transcripts. In: Proceedings of Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 327–335. EMNLP, Sydney (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Somasundaran, S., Wiebe, J.: Recognizing stances in online debates. In: Proceedings of 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th IJCNLP of the AFNLP, pp. 226–234. AFNLP, Suntec, Singapore (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Murakami, A., Raymond, R.: Support or oppose? Classifying positions in online debates from reply activities and opinion expressions. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 869–875. COLING, Beijing (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sridhar, D., Getoor, L., Walker, M.: Collective stance classification of posts in online debate forums. In: Proceedings of Joint Workshop on Social Dynamics and Personal Attributes in Social Media, pp. 109–117. ACL, Baltimore (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jiang, L., Yu, M., Zhou, M., Liu X.H., Zhao, T.J.: Target-dependent Twitter sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 151–160. ACL, Portland (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kiritchenko, S., Zhu, X., Mohammad, S.: Sentiment analysis of short informal texts. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 50, 723–762 (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Anand, P., Walker, M., Abbott, R., Tree, J.E.F., Bowmani, R., Minor, M.: Cats Rule and Dogs Drool!: classifying stance in online debate. In: Proceedings of 2nd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis, pp. 1–9. ACL, Portland (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Somasundaran, S., Wiebe, J.: Recognizing stance in ideological on-line debates. In: Proceedings of NAACL HLT Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, pp. 116–124. NAACL, Los Angeles (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hasan, K.S., Ng, V.: Stance classification of ideological debates: data, models, features, and constraints. In: Proceedings of 6th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 1348–1356. IJCNLP, Nagoya (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mohammad, S.M., Kiritchenko, S., Sobhani, P., Zhu, X.D., Cherry, C.: SemEval-2016 Task 6: detecting stance in tweets. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval-2016, San Diego, pp. 31–41 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. 徐琳宏, 林鸿飞, 潘宇.: 情感词汇本体的构造. 情报学报. 27(2), 180–185 (2008). (Xu, H.L., Lin, H.F., Pan, Y.: The construction of affective lexicon ontology. J. China Soc. Sci. Tech. Inf. 27(2), 180–185 (2008))

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

In building our system, we are grateful to all the people who have helped us. Sheng Li has helped us to parse the syntax tree; Jingjing Wang, Lu Zhang, Jinghang Gu, and Qing rong Xia have provided help in programing; Shoushan Li, Zhenghua Li, and Ziwei Fan have given us insight comments etc. We also would like to thank the organizer of this shared task for hard work, especially in data annotation and preparation.

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61272260), Ministry of Education China Mobile Research Foundation (MCM20150602), Jiangsu Provincial Science and Technology Plan (SBK2015022101), Huaian Applied Research and Scientific Technology Project (HAG2014025), and Huaiyin Normal University Youth Talent Support Program (13HSQNZ07).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiaoming Zhu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sun, Q., Wang, Z., Zhu, Q., Zhou, G. (2016). Exploring Various Linguistic Features for Stance Detection. In: Lin, CY., Xue, N., Zhao, D., Huang, X., Feng, Y. (eds) Natural Language Understanding and Intelligent Applications. ICCPOL NLPCC 2016 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10102. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50496-4_76

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50496-4_76

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50495-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50496-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics