Skip to main content

Researching Individual Satisfaction with Group Decisions in Tourism: Experimental Evidence

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2017

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to investigate how satisfied individuals are with the final outcome of a group decision-making process on a joint travel destination. Using an experimental paradigm (N total = 200, N groups = 55) it was obvious to hypothesize that individuals would especially be satisfied with the final group decision when it matched their own initial travel preference and that they would be dissatisfied in case it mismatched their initial preference. However, in addition the influence of personality and group dynamics differences (Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument, Five Factor Model) as well as travel types of the individual decision maker on the satisfaction level with the group decision outcome as the dependent variable were further researched. The paper concludes with implications for e-tourism, especially with regards to the development of interactive tools for group travel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delic, A. (2016). Picture-based approach to group recommender systems in e-tourism domain. In Conference Proceedings of the 24th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2016), Halifax, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delic, A., Neidhardt, J., Nguyen, T.N., & Ricci, F. (2016a). Research methods for group recommender systems. In Proceedings of RecTour 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delic, A., Neidhardt, J., Nguyen, T.N., Ricci, F., Rook, L., Werthner, H., & Zanker, M. (2016b). Observing group decision making processes. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender systems (RecSys 2016), Boston, MA, USA, ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Using conflict in organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felfernig, A., Gordea, S., Jannach, D., Teppan, E., & Zanker, M. (2007). A short survey of recommendation technologies in travel and tourism. OEGAI Journal, 25(7), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (2014). Group dynamics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, H., & Yiannakis, A. (2002). Tourist roles, needs and the lifecourse. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(2), 358–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, J. C. (2014). Team coordination and dynamics: Two central issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 355–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. B. (1988). The Abilene paradox: The management of agreement (pp. 17–43). Summer: Organizational Dynamics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 22.1–22.32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S. W., & Klein, K. J. (2000). Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masthoff, J. (2015). Group recommender systems: Aggregation, satisfaction and group attributes. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, & B. Shapira (Eds.), Recommender Systems Handbook (pp. 743–776). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the Five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neidhardt, J., Schuster, R., Seyfang, L., & Werthner, H. (2014). Eliciting the users’ unknown preferences. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systems (RecSys 2014) (pp. 309–312). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neidhardt, J., Seyfang, L., Schuster, R., & Werthner, H. (2015). A picture-based approach to recommender systems. Information Technology & Tourism, 15(1), 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. N., & Ricci, F. (2016). Supporting group decision making with recommendations and explanations. In Posters, Demos, Late-breaking Results and Workshop Proceedings of the 24th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2016). Halifax, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (2010). Thomas-Kilmann conflict mode instrument profile and interpretative report. Sunnyvale, CA: CPP Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 337–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange, P. A. M., Balliet, D., Parks, C. D., & Van Vugt, M. (2014). Social dilemmas: The psychology of human cooperation. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werthner, H., Alzua-Sorzabal, A., Cantoni, L., Dickinger, A., Gretzel, U., Jannach, D., et al. (2015). Future research issues in it and tourism. Information Technology & Tourism, 15(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, C. M., Hafenbraedl, S., Hoffrage, U., Reisen, N., & Woike, J. K. (2011). Are groups more likely to defer choice than their members? Judgment and Decision Making, 6(3), 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, V. F., & Bell, P. A. (2008). Predicting interpersonal conflict resolution styles from personality characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(2), 126–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amra Delic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Delic, A., Neidhardt, J., Rook, L., Werthner, H., Zanker, M. (2017). Researching Individual Satisfaction with Group Decisions in Tourism: Experimental Evidence. In: Schegg, R., Stangl, B. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2017. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51168-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics