Skip to main content

A Fuzzy TOPSIS with Z-Numbers Approach for Evaluation on Accident at the Construction Site

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances on Soft Computing and Data Mining (SCDM 2016)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 549))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1341 Accesses

Abstract

The construction industry has been identified as one of the most risky industries where involves fatalities accidents. Identifying the causes that lead to the accidents implicates a lot of uncertain and imprecise cases. Z-numbers involve more uncertainties than Fuzzy Sets (FSs). They provide us with additional degree of freedom to represent the uncertainty and fuzziness of the real situations. In this paper, we introduce a Fuzzy TOPSIS (FTOPSIS) with Z-numbers to handle uncertainty in the construction problems. Five criteria and six alternatives are used to evaluate the causes of workers’ accident at the construction sites. Data in form of linguistic variables were collected from three authorised personnel of three agencies. From the analysis, it shows that the FTOPSIS with Z-numbers provides us with an another useful way to handle Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making (FMCDM) problems in a more intelligent and flexible manner due to the fact that it uses Z-numbers with FTOPSIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhenghui, C., Yaoxing, W.: Explaining the Causes of Construction Accidents and Recommended Solutions. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Khosravi, Y., Asilian-Mahabadi, H., Hajizadeh, E.: Factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents on construction sites: a review. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. (JOSE) 20(1), 111–125 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sawacha, E., Naoum, S., Fong, D.: Factors affecting safety performance on construction sites. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 17(5), 309–315 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abdullah, D.N.M.A., Wern, G.C.M.: An analysis of accidents statistics in Malaysian construction sector. In: International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics, vol. 3. IACSIT Press, Hong Kong (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Syibrah, N., Hani, H.: A general type-2 fuzzy logic based approach for multi-criteria group decision making. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 353–358 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abdullah, L., Sunadia, J., Imran, T.: A new analytic hierarchy process in multi-attribute group decision making. Int. J. Soft Comput. 4(5), 208–2014 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, Z.-X., Wang, Y.-Y.: Evaluation of the provincial competitiveness of the Chinese high-tech industry using an improved TOPSIS method. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(6), 2824–2831 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lourenzutti, R., Krohling, R.A.: The Hellinger distance in multicriteria decision making: an illustration to the TOPSIS and TODIM methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(9), 4414–4421 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schneider, E.R.F.A., Krohling, R.A.: A hybrid approach using TOPSIS, Differential Evolution, and Tabu Search to find multiple solutions of constrained non-linear integer optimization problems. Expert Syst. Appl. 62, 47–56 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.S.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin (1981)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, C.T.: Extension of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. J. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114(1), 1–9 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Rezakhani, P.: Fuzzy MCDM model for risk factor selection in construction projects. Eng. J. 16, 5 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu, S.-T., Yu, S.-H., Chang, D.-S.: Using fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making approach for assessing the risk of railway reconstruction project in Taiwan. Sci. World J. 2014, 1–14 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou, J.-L., Bai, Z.-H., Sun, Z.-Y.: A hybrid approach for safety assessment in high-risk hydropower-construction-project work systems. Saf. Sci. 64, 163–172 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aliev, R.A., Zeinalova, L.M.: Decision making under Z-information. Hum.-Centric Decis.-Making Models 502, 233–252 (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Zadeh, L.A.: A note on Z-numbers. Inf. Sci. 181, 2923–2932 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kang, B., Wei, D., Li, Y., Deng, Y.: Decision making using Z-numbers under uncertain environment. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 8(7), 2807–2814 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zeinalova, L.M.: Chouquet aggregation based decision making under Z-information. ICTAT J. Soft Comput. Spec. Issue Soft Comput. Syst. Anal. Decis. Control 4, 819–824 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aksorn, T., Hadikusumo, B.H.W.: Critical success factors influencing safety program performance in Thai construction projects. Saf. Sci. 46(4), 709–727 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaskutas, V., Dale, A.M., Lipscomb, H., Gaal, J., Fuchs, M., Evanoff, B.A.: Fall prevention among apprentice carpenters. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 36(3), 258–265 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheng, C.W., Leu, S.S., Lin, C.C., Fan, C.: Characteristic analysis of occupational accidents at small construction enterprises. Saf. Sci. 48(6), 698–707 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lai, D.N.C., Liu, M., Ling, F.Y.Y.: A comparative study on adopting human resource practices for safety management on construction projects in the United States and Singapore. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 29(8), 1018–1032 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Siu, O.L., Phillips, D.R., Leung, T.W.: Age differences in safety attitudes and safety performance in Hong Kong construction workers. J. Saf. Res. 34(2), 199–205 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. López, M.A.C., Ritzel, D.O., Fontaneda, I., Alcantara, O.J.G.: Construction industry accidents in Spain. J. Saf. Res. 39(5), 497–507 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hinze, J., Devenport, J.N., Giang, G.: Analysis of construction worker injuries that do not result in lost time. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132(3), 321–326 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zheng, L., Xiang, H., Song, X., Wang, Z.: Nonfatal unintentional injuries and related factors among male construction workers in central China. Am. J. Ind. Med. 53(6), 588–595 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Törner, M., Pousette, A.: Safety in construction—a comprehensive description of the characteristics of high safety standards in construction work, from the combined perspective of supervisors and experienced workers. J. Saf. Res. 40(6), 399–409 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohamed, S., Ali, T.H., Tam, W.Y.V.: National culture and safe work behaviour of construction workers in Pakistan. Saf. Sci. 47(1), 29–35 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Choudhry, R.M., Fang, D.: Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: investigating factors on construction sites. Saf. Sci. 46(4), 566–584 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Abbe, O.O., Harvey, C.M., Ikuma, L.H., Aghazadeh, F.: Modeling the relationship between occupational stressors, psychosocial/physical symptoms and injuries in the construction industry. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 41(2), 106–117 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nurnadiah Zamri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zamri, N., Ahmad, F., Rose, A.N.M., Makhtar, M. (2017). A Fuzzy TOPSIS with Z-Numbers Approach for Evaluation on Accident at the Construction Site. In: Herawan, T., Ghazali, R., Nawi, N.M., Deris, M.M. (eds) Recent Advances on Soft Computing and Data Mining. SCDM 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 549. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51281-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51281-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51279-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51281-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics