Skip to main content

M2Onto: An Approach and a Tool to Learn OWL Ontology from MongoDB Database

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA 2016)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 557))

Abstract

Ontologies provide shared and reusable pieces of knowledge about a specific domain. Building an ontology by hand is a very hard and prone to errors task. Ontology learning from existing resources provides a good solution to this issue. Databases are widely used to store data. They were often considered as the most reliable sources for knowledge extraction. NOSQL databases are more and more used to store data. MongoDB database is emerging as the fastest growing NOSQL database in the world. It belongs to the document oriented databases variant. This paper proposes an approach to learn OWL ontology from data in MongoDB database and describes a tool implementing transformation rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://nosql-database.org/.

  2. 2.

    http://www.mongodb.org/.

  3. 3.

    http://couchdb.apache.org/.

  4. 4.

    http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.

  5. 5.

    http://dbs.uni-leipzig.de/en/research/projects/schema_and_ontology_matching/coma_3_0/coma_3_0_community_edition.

  6. 6.

    https://www.w3.org/.

  7. 7.

    https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Pellet.

References

  1. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. George, D: Understanding structural and semantic heterogeneity in the context of database shema integration. In: Proceedings of 6th Conference in the Department of Computing, (J. Dept. Comput. UCLan, (4), pp. 29–44 (2005). ISSN 1476-9069

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Ontology learning for the semantic web. IEEE Intell. Syst. 16(2), 72–79 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Ontology learning. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 173–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Cimiano, P., Mädche, A., Staab, S., Völker, J.: Ontology learning. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 245–267. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bontcheva, K., Sabou, M.: Learning ontologies from software artifacts: exploring and combining multiple sources. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Web Enabled Software Engineering (SWESE) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nayak, A., Poriya, A., Poriya, A.: Type of NOSQL databases and its comparison with relational databases. Int. J. Appl. Inf. Syst. (IJAIS) 5(4), 16–19 (2013). Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), New York, USA, ISSN 2249-0868

    Google Scholar 

  8. Curé, O., Lamolle, M., Le Duc, C.: Ontology based data integration over document and column family oriented NOSQL. The Computing Research Repository (Corr) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuiness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Baader, F., Sertkaya, B., Turhan, A.Y.: Computing the least common subsumer w.r.t. a background terminology. J. Appl. Log. 5, 400–412 (2004). Springer

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Obitko, M., Snasel, V., Smid, J.: Ontology design with formal concept analysis. In: CLA, vol. 110 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zimmermann, A., Le Duc, C.: Reasoning with a network of aligned ontologies. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems (ICWRRS), pp. 43–57 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kiran, V.K., Vijayakumar, R.: Ontology based data integration of NoSQL datastores. In: 9th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abbes, H., Boukettaya, S., Gargouri, F.: Learning ontology from big data through MongoDB database. In: 2015 IEEE/ACS 12th International Conference of Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanen Abbes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abbes, H., Gargouri, F. (2017). M2Onto: An Approach and a Tool to Learn OWL Ontology from MongoDB Database. In: Madureira, A., Abraham, A., Gamboa, D., Novais, P. (eds) Intelligent Systems Design and Applications. ISDA 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 557. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53480-0_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53480-0_60

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53479-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53480-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics