Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multiple Metamodels for Robustness Estimation in Multi-objective Robust Optimization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (EMO 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10173))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Due to the excessive cost of Monte Carlo simulation, metamodel is now frequently used to accelerate the process of robustness estimation. In this paper, we explore the use of multiple metamodels for robustness evaluation in multi-objective evolutionary robust optimization under parametric uncertainty. The concept is to build several different metamodel types, and employ cross-validation to pick the best metamodel or to create an ensemble of metamodels. Three types of metamodel were investigated: sparse polynomial chaos expansion (PCE), Kriging, and 2\(^\text {nd}\) order polynomial regression (PR). Numerical study on robust optimization of two test problems was performed. The result shows that the ensemble approach works well when all the constituent metamodel is sufficiently accurate, while the best scheme is more favored when there is a constituent metamodel with poor quality. Moreover, besides the accuracy, we found that it is also important to preserve the trend and smoothness of the decision variables-robustness relationship. PR, which is the less accurate metamodel from all, can found a better representation of the Pareto front than the sparse PCE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tsutsui, S., Ghosh, A.: Genetic algorithms with a robust solution searching scheme. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 1(3), 201–208 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deb, K., Gupta, H.: Introducing robustness in multi-objective optimization. Evol. Comput. 14(4), 463–494 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jin, Y., Branke, J.: Evolutionary optimization in uncertain environments-a survey. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 9(3), 303–317 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beyer, H.G., Sendhoff, B.: Robust optimization-a comprehensive survey. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196(33), 3190–3218 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Rumpfkeil, M.P.: Optimizations under uncertainty using gradients, hessians, and surrogate models. AIAA J. 51(2), 444–451 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Loeven, G., Witteveen, J., Bijl, H.: A probabilistic radial basis function approach for uncertainty quantification. In: Proceedings of the NATO RTO-MP-AVT-147 Computational Uncertainty in Military Vehicle Design Symposium (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Allen, M.S., Camberos, J.A.: Comparison of uncertainty propagation/response surface techniques for two aeroelastic systems. In: 50th AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Palm Springs (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blatman, G., Sudret, B.: Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression. J. Comput. Phys. 230(6), 2345–2367 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Goel, T., Haftka, R.T., Shyy, W., Queipo, N.V.: Ensemble of surrogates. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 33(3), 199–216 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paenke, I., Branke, J., Jin, Y.: Efficient search for robust solutions by means of evolutionary algorithms and fitness approximation. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 10(4), 405–420 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou, X., Ma, Y., Tu, Y., Feng, Y.: Ensemble of surrogates for dual response surface modeling in robust parameter design. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 29(2), 173–197 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Toal, D.J., Bressloff, N.W., Keane, A.J.: Kriging hyperparameter tuning strategies. AIAA J. 46(5), 1240–1252 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schobi, R., Sudret, B., Wiart, J.: Polynomial-chaos-based kriging. Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif. 5(2) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dubrule, O.: Cross validation of kriging in a unique neighborhood. J. Int. Assoc. Math. Geol. 15(6), 687–699 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Viana, F.A., Haftka, R.T., Steffen Jr., V.: Multiple surrogates: how cross-validation errors can help us to obtain the best predictor. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 39(4), 439–457 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oakley, J., O’Hagan, A.: Bayesian inference for the uncertainty distribution of computer model outputs. Biometrika 89(4), 769–784 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Knowles, J.: A summary-attainment-surface plotting method for visualizing the performance of stochastic multiobjective optimizers. In: 5th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA 2005), pp. 552–557. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sobieczky, H.: Parametric airfoils and wings. In: Fujii, K., Dulikravich, G.S. (eds.) Recent Development of Aerodynamic Design Methodologies, pp. 71–87. Springer, Braunschweig (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Fluid Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi Prefecture, 980-8577, Japan

    Pramudita Satria Palar & Koji Shimoyama

Authors
  1. Pramudita Satria Palar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Koji Shimoyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pramudita Satria Palar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Münster, Münster, Germany

    Heike Trautmann

  2. TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany

    Günter Rudolph

  3. University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany

    Kathrin Klamroth

  4. CINVESTAV-IPN, Mexico City, Mexico

    Oliver Schütze

  5. Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA

    Margaret Wiecek

  6. University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom

    Yaochu Jin

  7. University of Münster, Münster, Germany

    Christian Grimme

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Palar, P.S., Shimoyama, K. (2017). Multiple Metamodels for Robustness Estimation in Multi-objective Robust Optimization. In: Trautmann, H., et al. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10173. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54156-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54157-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation