Skip to main content

Manual and Computer-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement Plans: A Quantitative Comparison

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Methods and Clinical Applications for Spine Imaging (CSI 2016)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a quantitative comparison of manual and computer-assisted preoperative pedicle screw placement plans, obtained from three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) images of 17 patients with thoracic spinal deformities. Manual planning was performed by two spine surgeons by means of a dedicated software for planning of surgical procedures, while computer-assisted planning was based on automated 3D segmentation and modeling of vertebral structures from CT images, and automated modeling of the pedicle screw in 3D with maximization of the screw fastening strength. The analysis of the size (diameter and length) and insertion trajectory (pedicle crossing point, sagittal and axial inclinations) for 316 pedicle screws revealed a statistically significant difference in the screw size and insertion trajectory. However, computer-assisted planning did not propose narrower and shorter screws, which was reflected through a higher normalized screw fastening strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tian, N.F., Huang, Q.S., Zhou, P., Zhou, Y., Wu, R.K., Lou, Y., Xu, H.Z.: Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur. Spine J. 20(6), 846–859 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lehman, R.A., Polly, D.W., Kuklo, T.R., Cunningham, B., Kirk, K.L., Belmont, P.J.: Straight-forward versus anatomic trajectory technique of thoracic pedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 28(18), 2058–2065 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, C.S., Park, S.A., Hwang, C.J., Kim, D.J., Lee, W.J., Kim, Y.T., Lee, M.Y., Yoon, S.J., Lee, D.H.: A novel method of screw placement for extremely small thoracic pedicles in scoliosis. Spine 36(16), E1112–E1116 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koktekir, E., Ceylan, D., Tatarli, N., Karabagli, H., Recber, F., Akdemir, G.: Accuracy of fluoroscopically-assisted pedicle screw placement: analysis of 1,218 screws in 198 patients. Spine J. 14(8), 1702–1708 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho, S.K., Skovrlj, B., Lu, Y., Caridi, J.M., Lenke, L.G.: The effect of increasing pedicle screw size on thoracic spinal canal dimensions: an anatomic study. Spine 39(20), E1195–E1200 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kleck, C.J., Cullilmore, I., LaFleur, M., Lindley, E., Rentschler, M.E., Burger, E.L., Cain, C.M.J., Patel, V.V.: A new 3-dimensional method for measuring precision in surgical navigation and methods to optimize navigation accuracy. Eur. Spine J. 25(6), 1764–1774 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gstoettner, M., Lechner, R., Glodny, B., Thaler, M., Bach, C.M.: Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of computed tomographic 3D measurement of pedicles in scoliosis and size matching with pedicle screws. Eur. Spine J. 20(10), 1771–1779 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Knez, D., Likar, B., Pernuš, F., Vrtovec, T.: Computer-assisted screw size and insertion trajectory planning for pedicle screw placement surgery. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 35(6), 1420–1430 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, J., Kim, S., Kim, Y.S., Chung, W.K.: Optimal surgical planning guidance for lumbar spinal fusion considering operational safety and vertebra-screw interface strength: optimal surgical planning guidance for lumbar spinal fusion. Int. J. Med. Robot. 8(3), 261–272 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schreiber, J.J.: Hounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength: a tool for osteoporosis management. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 93(11), 1057–1063 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Linte, C.A., Augustine, K.E., Camp, J.J., Robb, R.A., Holmes III, D.R.: Toward virtual modeling and templating for enhanced spine surgery planning. In: Li, S., Yao, J. (eds.) Spinal Imaging and Image Analysis. LNCVB, vol. 18, pp. 441–467. Springer, Cham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chapman, J.R., Harrington, R.M., Lee, K.M., Anderson, P.A., Tencer, A.F., Kowalski, D.: Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. J. Biomech. Eng. 118(3), 391–398 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bianco, R.J., Arnoux, P.J., Wagnac, E., Mac-Thiong, J.M., Aubin, C.É.: Minimizing pedicle screw pullout risks: a detailed biomechanical analysis of screw design and placement. J. Spinal Disord. Tech. (2014). Publish Ahead of Print https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25075993

  14. Hirano, T., Hasegawa, K., Takahashi, H.E., Uchiyama, S., Hara, T., Washio, T., Sugiura, T., Yokaichiya, M., Ikeda, M.: Structural characteristics of the pedicle and its role in screw stability. Spine 22(21), 2504–2509 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weinstein, J.N., Rydevik, B.L., Rauschning, W.: Anatomic and technical considerations of pedicle screw fixation. Clin. Orthop. 284, 34–46 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roy-Camille, R., Saillant, G., Mazel, C.: Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin. Orthop. 203, 7–17 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Slovenian Research Agency under grants P2-0232, J2-5473, J7-6781 and J2-7118. The authors thank Ekliptik d.o.o., Slovenia, for using EBS for manual preoperative pedicle screw placement planning.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dejan Knez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Knez, D., Mohar, J., Cirman, R.J., Likar, B., Pernuš, F., Vrtovec, T. (2016). Manual and Computer-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement Plans: A Quantitative Comparison. In: Yao, J., Vrtovec, T., Zheng, G., Frangi, A., Glocker, B., Li, S. (eds) Computational Methods and Clinical Applications for Spine Imaging. CSI 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10182. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55050-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55050-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55049-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55050-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics