Skip to main content

Towards a Proposal for the Sustainability Through Institutions in Public Transport Services in Times of Emergency

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 279))

Abstract

The public transport service system provides safe and secure urban mobility for all citizens. This paper describes work-in-progress regarding its role in times of emergency, such as earthquakes, tornadoes, or terrorist attacks. In order to deliver good and safe transport service, it requires adequate resources such as information, staff, property, vehicle, infrastructure, the set of operational rules, and governance. In this perspective, establishing a sustainable and smart transport model to cope with transport services’ disruptions especially for emergency events is vital. A general characterization of critical actions for public transport Emergency Management Planning is provided. A new perspective on designing sustainable public transport services in times of emergency is introduced in order to support transport service company’s operational activities based on sustainable institutions principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pardo, T., Taewoo, N.: Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In: 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 282–291. ACM, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smart cities - Ranking of European medium-sized cities. European Smart Cities Project. http://www.smart-cities.eu/

  3. Transport 2050: The major challenges, the key measures. European Commission, MEMO/11/197, Brussels, 28 March 2011

    Google Scholar 

  4. A European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility. European Commission, Brussels, 20.7.2016, COM 501 final (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yatskiv, I., Pticina, I., Savrasovs, M.: Urban public transport system’s reliability estimation using microscopic simulation. Transp. Telecommun. 13(3), 219–228 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Van Oort, N., van Nes, R.: Improving reliability in urban public transport in strategic and tactical design. In: Compendium of Papers TRB 87th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tahmasseby, S.: Reliability in urban public transport network assessment and design. Ph.D. Thesis, TU Delft (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tahmasseby, S., van Nes, R.: Improving service reliability in urban transit networks. In: European Transport Conference. AET Papers Repository (2010). http://abstracts.aetransport.org/

  9. Corsar, D., Markovic, M., Edwards, P., Nelson, J.D.: The transport disruption ontology. In: Arenas, M., Corcho, O., Simperl, E., Strohmaier, M., d’Aquin, M., Srinivas, K., Groth, P., Dumontier, M., Heflin, J., Thirunarayan, K., Staab, S. (eds.) ISWC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9367, pp. 329–336. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25010-6_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Marsden, G., Docherty, I.: Insights on disruptions as opportunities for transport policy change. Transp. Res. Part A 51, 46–55 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. America under threat: transit responds to terrorism. American Public Transport Association, Special report, 11 September 2001. http://www.apta.com/

  12. Litman, T.: Lessons from Katrina and Rita. What major disasters can teach transportation planners. J. Transp. Eng. 132, 11–18 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sterling, S., Duddridge, B., Elliott, A., Conway, M., Payne, A.: Business Continuity for Dummies. Wiley, Haboken (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. How prepared are you? Business Continuity Management Toolkit, HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/

  15. Alexander, D.: Principles of emergency planning and management. Terra, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, England (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schafer, W.A., Ganoe, C.H., Carroll, J.M.: Supporting community emergency management planning through a geocollaboration software architecture. In: Carroll, J.M. (ed.) Learning in Communities, Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Human Centered Information Technology, pp. 225–258. Springer, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Emergency Management Planning Guide 2010–2011. Emergency Management Planning Unit, Canada. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/

  18. Haworth, J., Shammas, S., Lubin, R.: Eurostar and ALL public transport cancelled as Brussels residents told ‘stay put’ after terror attacks, 22 March 2016. http://www.mirror.co.uk/

  19. Attacks on Brussels: The Implications and Outlook. A Drum Cussac Global View. http://www.drum-cussac.com/

  20. Wolshon, B.: Planning for the evacuation of New Orleans. Inst. Transp. Eng. (ITE J.) 72(2), 44–49 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Transportation Research Board: The Role of Transit in Emergency Evacuation. Special report 294, Committee on the Role of Public Transportation in Emergency Evacuation. http://www.TRB.org

  22. Giuliano, G., Golob, J.: Impacts of the Northridge earthquake on transit and highway use. J. Transp. Stat. 1(2), 1–20 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maintaining Communications Capabilities during Major Natural Disasters and other Emergency Situations. Study Group on Maintaining Communications Capabilities during Major Natural Disasters and other Emergency Situations, Final report, 27 December 2011. http://www.soumu.go.jp/

  24. Spohrer, J.C., Demirkan, H., Krishna, V.: Service and science. In: Demirkan, H., Spohrer, J.C., Krishna, V. (eds.) The Science of Service Systems. Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy, pp. 325–358. Springer, New York (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Lyons, K., Tracy, S.: Characterizing organizations as service systems. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 23(1), 19–27 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ostrom, E.: Design principles and threats to sustainable organizations that manage commons. In: Digital Library of the Commons, Indiana University, Working Paper W99–6 (1999). http://hdl.handle.net/10535/5465

  27. Ostrom, E.: Response: the institutional analysis and development framework and the commons. Cornell Law Rev. 95(4), 807–815 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 44(1), 5–23 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Koskela-Huotari, K., Siltaloppi, J., Vargo, S.L.: Designing institutional complexity to enable innovation in service ecosystems. In: 49th Hawaii IEEE International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1596–1605. IEEE Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Koskela-Huotari, K., Vargo, S.L.: Institutions as resource context. J. Serv. Theor. Pract. 26(2), 163–178 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vargo, S.L., Wieland, H., Akaka, M.A.: Innovation through institutionalization: a service ecosystems perspective. Ind. Mark. Manage. 44, 63–72 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pitt, J., Busquets, D., Riveret, R.: The pursuit of computational justice in open systems. AI Soc. 30(3), 359–378 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pitt, J., Diaconescu, A.: The algorithmic governance of common-pool resources. In: Clippinger, J.H., Bollier, D. (eds.) From Bitcoin to Burning Man and Beyond. The Quest for Identity and Autonomy in a Digital Society, pp. 130–142 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pitt, J., Busquets, D., Diaconescu, A., Nowak, A., Rychwalska, A., Roszczynska-Kurasinska, M.: Algorithmic self-governance and the design of socio-technical systems. In: European Conference on Social Intelligence, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 262–273 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stokes, P.: Bus firm pays £ 140,000 penalty for early running. The Telegraph, 18 October 2003. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/

  36. Shibghatullah, A.S.: A multi-agent system for a bus crew rescheduling system. Ph.D. thesis, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Brunoro, C.M., Sznelwar, L.I., Bolis, I., Abrahaoa, J.: The work of bus drivers and their contribution to excellence in public transportation. Prod. J. 25(2), 323–335 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Drǎgoicea .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Drǎgoicea, M., Salehpour, S., Nóvoa, H., Oltean, V.E. (2017). Towards a Proposal for the Sustainability Through Institutions in Public Transport Services in Times of Emergency. In: Za, S., Drăgoicea, M., Cavallari, M. (eds) Exploring Services Science. IESS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 279. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56925-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56925-3_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56924-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56925-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics