Skip to main content

Multi-resource Minority Games: Redefining the Game

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of SAI Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys) 2016 (IntelliSys 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 16))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3000 Accesses

Abstract

The minority game has been studied by the scientific community in Artificial Intelligence and Multi-Agent Systems as a model for resource allocation. This paper contributes to the accumulating scientific literature in minority games by investigating an area lacking in current research: the availability of multiple resources and the effect of parameters in their utilization. Even though there is a research topic called multi-resource minority game, we argue here that they are more like a “multi-option” minority game. Under a multi-resource scenario we investigate two issues: (i) strategy sharing and (ii) the effect of resource capacity to agent attendance, variance, and winning rate. Furthermore, we introduce a new criteria named resource usage that has not been studied in minority game research and captures how well a resource is used. We find that the use of a single strategy is not as effective as using different strategies when attempting to utilize resources simultaneously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Assuming a resource capacity of around 50% of the population.

  2. 2.

    Only one process can occupy, hold or use a CPU (or a core of CPU in a multi-core CPU). So, when we talk about holding a CPU (or a core), we address the ready queue of the system’s processor. Sometimes, it is better for a process not to wait in a ready queue of a specific CPU, because it may take a long time and lead the process into a deadlock situation.

  3. 3.

    The first element of the strategy is taken into account corresponding to the situation where all previous outcomes of the game (or the recent ones in memory) should be zero (i.e. no agent chooses to use or go for the resource). Similarly, the last element represents the situation where all of the previous outcomes of the game is one (i.e. all agents choose to use the resource).

References

  1. Moro, E.: The minority game: an introductory guide, arXiv preprint cond-mat/0402651 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shang, L., Wang, X.F.: Evolutionary minority game on complex networks. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 377(2), 616–624 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Arthur, W.B.: Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality. Am. Econ. Rev. 84(2), 406–411 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Challet, D., Zhang, Y.-C.: Emergence of cooperation and organization in an evolutionary game. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 246(3), 407–418 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kets, W., Voorneveld, M.: Congestion, equilibrium and learning: The minority game. Available at SSRN 1012271 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Galstyan, A., Krishnamachari, B., Lerman, K.: Resource allocation and emergent coordination in wireless sensor networks (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tanenbaum, A.S., Woodhull, A.S.: Operating Systems: Design and Implementation, vol. 2. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Woodhull, A.S., Tanenbaum, A.S.: Operating systems design and implementation (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, Z.-G., Zhang, J.-Q., Dong, J.-Q., Huang, L., Lai, Y.-C.: Emergence of grouping in multi-resource minority game dynamics. Sci. Rep. 2, 703 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Börner, K., Sanyal, S., Vespignani, A.: Network science. Ann. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 41(1), 537–607 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Remondino, M., Cappellini, A.: Minority game with communication: an agent based model. In: Simulation in Industry (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barabási, A.-L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439), 509–512 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Caridi, I., Ceva, H.: The underlying complex network of the minority game (2008). arXiv preprint: arXiv:0802.0672

  14. Zhang, C., Wu, W., Huang, H., Yu, H.: Fair energy resource allocation by minority game algorithm for smart buildings, pp. 63–68 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shafique, M., Bauer, L., Ahmed, W., Henkel, J.: Minority-game-based resource allocation for run-time reconfigurable multi-core processors, pp. 1–6 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mähönen, P., Petrova, M.: Minority game for cognitive radios: cooperating without cooperation. Phys. Commun. 1(2), 94–102 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Catteeuw, D., Manderick, B.: Learning in minority games with multiple resources, vol. 5778, pp. 326–333 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tanenbaum, A.S., Van Steen, M.: Distributed Systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge support from National Science Foundation (NSF) grant No. 1263011.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Mahdi Seyednezhad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Romero, D., Shinseki, E., Seyednezhad, S.M.M., Menezes, R. (2018). Multi-resource Minority Games: Redefining the Game. In: Bi, Y., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds) Proceedings of SAI Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys) 2016. IntelliSys 2016. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56991-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56991-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56990-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56991-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics