Skip to main content

Conceptualization of Methods and Experiments in Data Intensive Research Domains

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Analytics and Management in Data Intensive Domains (DAMDID/RCDL 2016)

Abstract

Nowadays research of various scopes especially in natural sciences requires manipulation of big volumes of data generated by observation, experiments and modeling. Organization of data-intensive research assumes definition of domain specifications including concepts (specified by ontologies) and formal representation of data describing domain objects and their behavior (using conceptual schemes), shared and maintained by communities working in the respective domains. Research infrastructures are based on domain specifications and provide methods applied to such specifications, collected and developed by research communities. Tools for organizing experiments in research infrastructures are also supported by conceptual specifications of measuring and investigating object properties, applying the research methods, describing and testing the hypotheses. Astronomy as a sample data intensive domain is chosen to demonstrate building of conceptual specifications and usage of them for data analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. AstroGrid. http://www.astrogrid.org/

  2. Guidelines on FAIR Data Management in Horizon 2020: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation European Commission (2016). http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_en.pdf

  3. IVOAO Ontology: University of Maryland (2010). http://www.astro.umd.edu/~eshaya/astroonto/

  4. IVOA Photometry Data Model: Version 1.0. IVOA (2013). http://www.ivoa.net/documents/PHOTDM/

  5. Ontology of Astronomical Object Types: Version 1.20. IVOA (2009). http://www.ivoa.net/documents/latest/AstrObjectOntology.html

  6. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Document Overview, 2nd edn. W3C (2012). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-overview/

  7. Kifer, M.: Rule interchange format: the framework. In: Calvanese, D., Lausen, G. (eds.) RR 2008. LNCS, vol. 5341, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88737-9_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Sky Event Reporting Metadata (VOEvent): Version 2.0. IVOA (2011). http://www.ivoa.net/Documents/VOEvent/

  9. Space-Time Coordinate Metadata for the Virtual Observatory Version 1.33: IVOA (2011). http://www.ivoa.net/documents/latest/STC.html

  10. Hey, T., et al. (eds.): The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Microsoft Research, Redmond (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abrial, J.R.: The B Book. Assigning Programs to Meanings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Belhajjame, K., et al.: Workflow-centric research objects: a first class citizen in the scholarly discourse. In: ESWC2012 Workshop on the Future of Scholarly Communication in the Semantic Web (SePublica2012), pp. 1–12, Heraklion (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Briukhov, D.O., Vovchenko, A.E., Kalinichenko L.A.: Support of the workflow specifications reuse by ensuring its independence of the specific data collections and services. In: Proceedings of the 15th Russian Conference on Digital Libraries RCDL 2013, vol. 1108, pp. 61–69. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2013). (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Doorn, P., Dillo, I.: FAIR data in trustworthy data repositories. DANS/EUDAT/OpenAIRE Webinar (2016). https://eudat.eu/events/webinar/fair-data-in-trustworthy-data-repositories-webinar

  15. Kalinichenko, L.A., Briukhov, D.O., Martynov, D.O., Skvortsov, N.A., Stupnikov, S.A.: Mediation framework for enterprise information system infrastructures. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, ICEIS 2007. Volume Databases and Information Systems Integration, Funchal, pp. 246–251(2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kalinichenko, L.A., Stupnikov, S.A.: OWL as yet another data model to be integrated. In: Proceedings of the 15th East-European Conference Advances in Databases and Information Systems, vol. 2, pp. 178–189. Austrian Computer Society, Vienna (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kalinichenko, L.A., Stupnikov, S.A., Martynov, D.O.: SYNTHESIS: a language for canonical information modeling and mediator definition for problem solving in heterogeneous information resource environments, 171 p. IPI RAS, Moscow (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kalinichenko, L., Stupnikov, S., Vovchenko, A., Kovalev, D.: Rule-based multidialect infrastructure for conceptual problem solving over heterogeneous distributed information resources. In: Catania, B., et al. (eds.) New Trends in Databases and Information Systems. AISC, vol. 241, pp. 61–68. Springer, Cham (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Kogalovskiy, M.R., Kalinichenko, L.A.: Conceptual modeling in database technologies and ontological models. In: Kalinichenko, L.A. (ed.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontological Modeling, pp. 114–148. IPI RAS, Moscow (2008). (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Luric, M., Tysoc, T.: LSST data management: entering the era of petascale optical astronomy. Proc. Int. Astron. Union 10(H16), 675–676 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Robin, A.C., Reylé, C., Derrière, S., Picaud, S.: A synthetic view on structure and evolution of the Milky Way. Astron. Astrophys. 409, 523–540 (2003). doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031117. Astrophysics Data System

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schentz, H., le Franc, Y.: Building a semantic repository using B2SHARE. In: EUDAT 3rd Conference (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Skvortsov, N.A.: Application of concept refinement in salvation of ontology manipulation tasks. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Russian Conference on Digital Libraries RCDL 2007, pp. 225–229. Pereslavl University, Pereslavl-Zalesskij (2007). (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Skvortsov, N.A.: Using of an interactive proving system for ontology mapping. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Russian Conference on Digital Libraries, RCDL 2006, Suzdal, pp. 65–69. P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, Yaroslavl (2006). (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Skvortsov, N.A., Kalinichenko, L.A., Kovalev, D.Y.: Conceptual modeling of subject domains in data intensive research. In: Selected Papers of the XVIII International Conference on Data Analytics and Management in Data Intensive Domains (DAMDID/RCDL 2016), vol. 1752, pp. 7–15. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2016). (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Skvortsov, N.A., et al.: Metadata model for semantic search for rule-based workflow implementations. Syst. Means. Inform. 24(4), 4–28 (2014). IPI RAS, Moscow (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Starr, J., et al.: Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 1, e1 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stupnikov, S.A.: Mapping of canonical model core specifications in abstract machine Notation. In: Formal Methods and Models for Compositional Infrastructures of Distributed Information Systems: The Systems and Means of Informatics, pp. 69–95. IPI RAS, Moscow (2005). Special Issue (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tejo-Alonso, C., Berrueta, D., Polo, L., Fernández, S.: Metadata for web ontologies and rules: current practices and perspectives. In: García-Barriocanal, E., Cebeci, Z., Okur, M.C., Öztürk, A. (eds.) MTSR 2011. CCIS, vol. 240, pp. 56–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24731-6_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Vovchenko, A.E., et al.: From specifications of requirements to conceptual schema. In: Proceedings of the 12th Russian Conference on Digital Libraries RCDL 2010, pp. 375–381. Kazan Federal University, Kazan (2010). (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Walton, N.A., et al.: Taverna and workflows in the virtual observatory. In: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems ASP Conference Series, vol. 394, p. 309 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wilkinson M., et al: The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. data 3 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wilkinson, M.D., et al.: Interoperability and FAIRness through a novel combination of web technologies. PeerJ Prepr. 5, e2522v2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2522v2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was partly supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research grants 15-29-06045, 16-07-01028, and 16-07-01162.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikolay A. Skvortsov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Skvortsov, N.A., Kalinichenko, L.A., Kovalev, D.Y. (2017). Conceptualization of Methods and Experiments in Data Intensive Research Domains. In: Kalinichenko, L., Kuznetsov, S., Manolopoulos, Y. (eds) Data Analytics and Management in Data Intensive Domains. DAMDID/RCDL 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 706. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57135-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57135-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57134-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57135-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics