Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

ASRD: Algorithm for Spliced Region Detection in Digital Image Forensics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Engineering Trends and Techniques in Intelligent Systems (CSOC 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 575))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Image splicing is one of the most frequently exercised in the area of image forgery that is quite challenging to be identified. After reviewing existing techniques towards identification of spliced region, it was found that existing techniques are either computationally expensive or do not address the cumulative problem. Hence, this paper, a novel and simple algorithm is presented called as ASRD i.e. Algorithm for Spliced Region Detection. A simple statistical-based approach is presented that perform partitioned blocks followed by detection of various artifacts among the neighbor blocks. The algorithm then implicates a classification condition for tampered and non-tampered region to truly identify the spliced region. With an aid of histogram analysis, true positive score, true negative score, accuracy and computational performance, the proposed algorithm was found to excel better performance in detection of spliced region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shih, F.Y.: Multimedia Security: Watermarking, Steganography, and Forensics. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Julliand, T., Nozick, V., Talbot, H.: Image noise and digital image forensics. In: Shi, Y.-Q., Kim, H.J., Pérez-González, F., Echizen, I. (eds.) IWDW 2015. LNCS, vol. 9569, pp. 3–17. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31960-5_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Ding, F., Dong, W., Zhu, G., Shi, Y.-Q.: An advanced texture analysis method for image sharpening detection. In: Shi, Y.-Q., Kim, H.J., Pérez-González, F., Echizen, I. (eds.) IWDW 2015. LNCS, vol. 9569, pp. 72–82. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31960-5_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi, C.-H., Lee, M.-J., Hyun, D.-K., Lee, H.-K.: Forged region detection for scanned images. Springer-Comput. Sci. Converg. 114, 687–694 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Malviya, P., Naskar, R.: Digital forensic technique for double compression based JPEG image forgery detection. Springer-Inf. Syst. Secur. 8880, 437–447 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, S.: iMediaEthics’ Top 10 Fake and Doctored Photo Stories. An online article of iMediaEthics 2016. http://www.imediaethics.org/imediaethics-top-10-fake-and-doctored-photo-stories/. Accessed 20 Oct

  7. Vamosi, R.: Researcher: Bin Laden’s beard is real, video is not. An online article of CNET. https://www.cnet.com/news/researcher-bin-ladens-beard-is-real-video-is-not/. Accessed 20 Oct 2016

  8. Blitzer, H.L., Stein-Ferguson, K., Huang, J.: Understanding Forensic Digital Imaging. Academic Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stamm, M.C., Liu, K.J.R.: Forensic detection image manipulation using statistical intrinsic fingerprints. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 5(3), 492–506 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weisi, L., Tao, D., Kacprzyk, J., Li, Z., Izquierdo, E.: Haohong Wang, Multimedia Analysis, Processing and Communications. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sundarm, A.M., Nandini, C.: Copy-move forgery detection- a survey. In: ICACCN-International Conference on Advanced Computing, Communication Networks, Chandigarh, 02–03 June 2011

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sundarm, A.M., Nandini, C.: Investigational study of image forensic applications, techniques and research directions. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. Certif. J. 4(8), 1–9 (2014). https://www.ijetae.com. ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sundarm, A.M., Nandini, C.: Image retouching and it’s detection-a survey. In: NCGCT-First National Conference on Green Computing Technologies, DSATM, Bangalore, 07 March 2015

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sundarm, A.M., Nandini, C.: Feature based image authentication using symmetric surround saliency mapping in image forensics. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 104(13), 1–9 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sundarm, A.M., Nandini, C.: CBFD: coherence based forgery detection technique in image forensics analysis. In: IEEE-ICERECT-2015-International Conference on Emerging Research in Electronics, Computer Science and Technology, 17–19 December 2015

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cozzolino, D., Poggi, G., Verdoliva, L.: Splicebuster: a new blind image splicing detector. In: IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zampoglou, M., Papadopoulos, S., Kompatsiaris, Y.: Detecting image splicing in the wild (web). In: IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshop, pp. 1–6 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Amerini, I., Becarelli, R., Caldelli, R., Mastio, A.D.: Splicing forgeries localization through the use of first digit features. In: IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moghaddasi, Z., Jalab, H.A., Md Noor, R.: SVD-based image splicing detection. In: International Conference on Information Technology and Multimedia (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Su, B., Yuan, Q., Wang, S., Zhao, C., Li, S.: Enhanced state selection Markov model for image splicing detection. Springer-EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2014, 1–10 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Han, J.G., Park, T.H., Moon, Y.H., Eom, K.: Efficient Markov feature extraction method for image splicing detection using maximization and threshold expansion. J. Electron. Imaging 25(2), 023031 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, Y., Zhao, C., Pi, Y., Li, S.: Revealing image splicing forgery using local binary patterns of DCT coefficients. In: Liang, Q., et al. (eds.) Springer Journals of Communications, Signal Processing, and Systems. LNEE, pp. 181–189. Springer, New York (2012). doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5803-6_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Saleh, S.Q., Hussain, M., Muhammad, G., Bebis, G.: Evaluation of image forgery detection using multi-scale weber local descriptors. In: Bebis, G., et al. (eds.) ISVC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8034, pp. 416–424. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41939-3_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao, X., Li, S., Wang, S., Li, J., Yang, K.: Optimal chroma-like channel design for passive color image splicing detection. Springer-EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2012, 240 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pan, X., Zhang, X., Lyu, S.: Exposing image splicing with inconsistent local noise variances. In: IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography, pp. 1–10 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Niu, H., Zhou, C., Wang, B., Zheng, X., Zhou, S.: Splicing model and hyper-chaotic system for image encryption. J. Electr. Eng. 67(2), 78–86 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Columbia Image Splicing Detection Evaluation Dataset. http://www.ee.columbia.edu/ln/dvmm/downloads/AuthSplicedDataSet/AuthSplicedDataSet.htm, Retrieved 06th February 2017

  28. Ferrara, P., Bianchi, T., De Rosa, A., Piva, A.: Image forgery localization via fine-grained analysis of CFA artifacts. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 7(5), 1566–1577 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computing and Information Technology, REVA University, Bangalore, India

    A. Meenakshi Sundaram

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Dayanand Sagar Academy of Technology and Management, Bangalore, India

    C. Nandini

Authors
  1. A. Meenakshi Sundaram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Nandini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Meenakshi Sundaram .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Applied Informatics, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Zlin, Czech Republic

    Radek Silhavy

  2. Faculty of Applied Informatics, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Zlin, Czech Republic

    Petr Silhavy

  3. Faculty of Applied Informatics, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Zlin, Czech Republic

    Zdenka Prokopova

  4. Faculty of Applied Informatics, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Zlin, Czech Republic

    Roman Senkerik

  5. Faculty of Applied Informatics, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Zlin, Czech Republic

    Zuzana Kominkova Oplatkova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Meenakshi Sundaram, A., Nandini, C. (2017). ASRD: Algorithm for Spliced Region Detection in Digital Image Forensics. In: Silhavy, R., Silhavy, P., Prokopova, Z., Senkerik, R., Kominkova Oplatkova, Z. (eds) Software Engineering Trends and Techniques in Intelligent Systems. CSOC 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 575. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57141-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57141-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57140-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57141-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation