Skip to main content

Software Configuration Based on Order Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Modeling and Software Design (BMSD 2016)

Abstract

Business processes have proven to be essential for organisations to be highly flexible and competitive in today’s markets. However, good process management is not enough to survive in a market if the according IT landscape is not aligned to the business processes. Especially industries focused on software products are facing big problems if the according processes are not aligned to the overall software system architecture. Often, a lot of development resources are spent for features which are never addressed by any business goals, leading to unnecessary development costs. In this paper, we will present a framework for an automatic, order process driven, software configuration. For this, modern software product line engineering techniques are used to provide a systematic way to align the variability of the order processes with the software architecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/javase/index-140168.html.

References

  1. McCormack, K.P., Johnson, W.C.: Business Process Orientation: Gaining the E-Business Competitive Advantage. Saint Lucie Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Valença, G., Alves, C., Alves, V., Niu, N.: A Systematic Mapping Study on Business Process Variability. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. (IJCSIT) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Willaert, P., Bergh, J., Willems, J., Deschoolmeester, D.: The process-oriented organisation: a holistic view developing a framework for business process orientation maturity. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Saidani, O., Nurcan, S.: Towards context aware business process modelling. In: 8th Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support (BPMDS 2007), CAiSE. vol. 7, p. 1 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sinnhofer, A.D., Pühringer, P., Kreiner, C.: varbpm - a product line for creating business process model variants. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design, pp. 184–191 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fantinato, M., Toledo, M.B.F., Thom, L.H., Gimenes, I.M.S., Rocha, R.S., Garcia, D.Z.G.: A survey on reuse in the business process management domain. Int. J. Bus. Process Integr. Manage. 6(1), 52–76 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Derguech, W.: Towards a framework for business process models reuse. In: The CAiSE Doctoral Consortium (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gimenes, I., Fantinato, M., Toledo, M.: A product line for business process management. In: International Software Product Line Conference, pp. 265–274 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Guaranteeing soundness of configurable process variants in provop. In: IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing, CEC 2009, pp. 98–105. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Issues in modeling process variants with provop. In: Ardagna, D., Mecella, M., Yang, J. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNBIP, vol. 17, pp. 56–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00328-8_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Reichert, M., Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T.: Lifecycle support for business process variants. In: Brocke, J.V., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 1, pp. 251–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gottschalk, F., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Jansen-Vullers, M.H., Rosa, M.L.: Configurable Workflow Models. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rosa, M., Dumas, M., Hofstede, A.H.M., Mendling, J., Gottschalk, F.: Beyond control-flow: extending business process configuration to roles and objects. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 199–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87877-3_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Haugen, O., Wasowski, A., Czarnecki, K.: Cvl: common variability language. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Software Product Line Conference, SPLC 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao, X., Zou, Y.: A business process-driven approach for generating software modules. Softw. Pract. Experience. 41(10), 1049–1071 (2011)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Österle, H.: Business Engineering - Prozess- und Systementwicklung. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sinnhofer, A.D., Pühringer, P., Potzmader, K., Orthacker, C., Steger, C., Kreiner, C.: A framework for process driven software configuration. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design, pp. 196–203 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation - A Manifesto For Business Revolution. Harper Business, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. O.M.G.: Business process model and notation (bpmn). version 2.0, pp. 1–538 (2011). http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/

  20. Strnadl, C.F.: Aligning business and it: the process-driven architecture model. Inf. Syst. Manage. 23(4), 67–77 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Novak, W., Peterson, A.: Feature-oriented domain analysis (foda) feasibility study (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., Linden, F.J.v.d.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weiss, D.M., Lai, C.T.R.: Software Product-Line Engineering: A Family-Based Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project is funded by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG). Project Partners are NXP Semiconductor Austria GmbH and the Technical University of Graz. We want to gratefully thank Danilo Beuche from pure::systems for his support. Further, the authors want to gratefully thank Felix Jonathan Oppermann for his support during the design and the implementation of the industrial prototype.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Daniel Sinnhofer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sinnhofer, A.D., Pühringer, P., Potzmader, K., Orthacker, C., Steger, C., Kreiner, C. (2017). Software Configuration Based on Order Processes. In: Shishkov, B. (eds) Business Modeling and Software Design. BMSD 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 275. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57222-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics