Skip to main content

Integrating System Dynamics with Exploratory MCDA for Robust Decision-Making

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Decision Support Systems VII. Data, Information and Knowledge Visualization in Decision Support Systems (ICDSST 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 282))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to propose a process to support decision making, in which System Dynamics is combined with Multi Criteria Decision Aid methods to mitigate the limitations of the two methodologies when used alone and find robust policies. The proposed process is based on Exploratory Modeling and Analysis, a framework that allows the use of multiple methods – under different perceptions, detail, and levels of abstraction – in order to address issues of uncertainty and robustness. A case study is used to illustrate how the process can offer deeper insights and act as a valuable decision support system. Finally, it also demonstrates the potential of Exploratory Modeling and Analysis to deal with uncertainties and identify robust policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ouerdane, W., Maudet, N., Tsoukias, A.: Argumentation theory and decision aiding. In: Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J., Salvatore, G. (eds.) Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, pp. 177–208. Springer, US (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Forrester, J.W.: Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sterman, J.D.: Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Irvin/McGraw-Hill, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sterman, J.D.: Modeling managerial behavior: misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Manage. Sci. 35(3), 321–339 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Santos, V., Belton, V., Howick, S.: Adding value to performance measurement by using system dynamics and multicriteria analysis. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 22(11), 1246–1272 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gardiner, P., Ford, A.: Which policy run is best, and who says so. TIMS Stud. Manag. Sci. 14, 241–257 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Belton, V., Stewart, T.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Guitouni, A., Martel, J.: Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 109(2), 501–521 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kunsch, P.L.: How System dynamics education may enhance virtue-based ethics. EURO J. Decision Processes 4(1–2), 33–52 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yatsalo, B., Didenko, V., Gritsuyuk, S., Sullivan, T.: Decerns: a framework for multi-criteria decision analysis. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 8(3), 467–489 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Polatidis, H., Haralambopoulos, D., Vreeker, R.: Selecting an appropriate multi-criteria decision analysis technique for renewable energy planning. Energy Sources Part B 1(2), 181–193 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bouyssou, D.: Modelling inaccurate determination, uncertainty, imprecision using multiple criteria. In: Lockett, A.G., Islei, G. (eds.) Improving Decision Making in Organizations, pp. 78–87. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Roy, B.: Main sources of inaccurate determination, uncertainty and imprecision in decision models. Math. Comput. Model. 12(10), 1245–1254 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roy, B.: A missing link in operational research decision aiding: robustness analysis. Found. Comput. Decision Sci. 23, 141–160 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pruyt, E.: Dealing with uncertainties? Combining system dynamics with multiple criteria decision analysis or with exploratory modeling. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Boston, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pubule, J., Blumberga, A., Romagnoli, F., Blumberga, D.: Finding an optimal solution for biowaste management in the Baltic States. J. Clean. Prod. 88, 214–223 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brans, J., Macharis, C., Kunsch, P., Chevalier, A.: Combining multicriteria decision aid and system dynamics for the control of socio-economic processes: an iterative real-time procedure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 109(2), 428–441 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reagan-Cirincione, P., Schuman, S., Richardson, G., Dorf, S.: Decision modeling: tools for strategic thinking. Interfaces 21(6), 52–65 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. van der Paas, J., Walker, W., Marchau, V., van Wee, G., Agusdinata, D.: Exploratory mcda for handling deep uncertainties: the case of intelligent speed adaptation implementation. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 17(1–2), 1–23 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bankes, S.: Exploratory modeling for policy analysis. Oper. Res. 41(3), 435–449 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Auping, W., Pruyt, E., de Jong, S., Kwakkel, J.: The geopolitical impact of the shale revolution: Exploring consequences on energy prices and rentier states. Energy Policy 98, 390–399 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roy, B.: Paradigms and challenges. In: Greco, S., Figueira, J., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, 2 edn., pp. 19–39. Springer, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Munier, A.: A Strategy for Using Multicriteria Analysis in Decision-Making. Springer, Netherlands (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, S., Park, H., Lee, H., Jung, C.: MAUT approach for selecting a proper decommissioning scenario. In: Proceedings of the Waste Management Symposium 2007 Conference, Tucson, AZ (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tsaples, G., Pruyt, E., Kovari, A., Vasilopoulos, C.: A shock to the system: How can Land Value Taxation change the face of the cities? In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Boston, MA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Forrester, J.W.: Urban Dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hobbs, B., Chankong, V., Hamadeh, W., Stakhiv, E.: Does choice of multicriteria method matter? an experiment in water resources planning. Water Resour. Res. 28(7), 1767–1779 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgios Tsaples .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tsaples, G., Papathanasiou, J., Ploskas, N. (2017). Integrating System Dynamics with Exploratory MCDA for Robust Decision-Making. In: Linden, I., Liu, S., Colot, C. (eds) Decision Support Systems VII. Data, Information and Knowledge Visualization in Decision Support Systems. ICDSST 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 282. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57487-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics