Skip to main content

Accountability for Federated Clouds

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computer and Network Security Essentials

Abstract

The evolution of software service delivery has changed the way accountability is performed. The complexity related to cloud computing environments increases the difficulty in properly performing accountability, since the evidences are spread through the whole infrastructure, from different servers at physical, virtualization, and application layers. This complexity increases when we are considering cloud federation because besides the inherent complexity of the virtualized environment, the federation members may not implement the same security procedures and policies. The main objective of this chapter is to present concepts about cloud security, discussing why accountability in federated scenarios is important and hard to provide, and propose an accountability framework, named CloudAcc, that supports audit, management, planning and billing process in federated cloud environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aoyama, T., & Sakai, H. (2011). Inter-cloud-computing. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 53(3), 171–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ardagna, C. A., Asal, R., Damiani, E., & Vu, Q. H. (2015). From security to assurance in the cloud: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 48(1), 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I., et al. (2010). A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 53(4), 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Avetisyan, A. I., Campbell, R., Lai, K., Lyons, M., Milojicic, D. S., Lee, H. Y., Soh, Y. C., Ming, N. K., Luke, J. -Y., & Namgoong, H. et al. (2010). Open cirrus: A global cloud computing testbed. IEE Computer Society, 43(4), 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barreto, L., Fraga, J., & Siqueira, F. (2015). Cloud federations and security attributes. In 2015 XXXIII Brazilian Symposium on Computer Networks and Distributed Systems (SBRC) (pp. 140–149). New York: IEEE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Buyya, R., Ranjan, R., & Calheiros, R. N. (2010). Intercloud: Utility-oriented federation of cloud computing environments for scaling of application services. In Algorithms and architectures for parallel processing (pp. 13–31). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Castelluccia, C., Druschel, P., Hübner, S., Pasic, A., Preneel, B., & Tschofenig, H. (2011). Privacy, accountability and trust-challenges and opportunities. ENISA [Online]. Available: http://www.enisa.europa.eu/activities/identity-and-trust/library/deliverables/pat-study/atdownload/fullReport.

  8. Dagger, D., O’Connor, A., Lawless, S., Walsh, E., & Wade, V. P. (2007). Service-oriented e-learning platforms: From monolithic systems to flexible services. Internet Computing, IEEE, 11(3), 28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Erl, T. (2008). Soa: Principles of service design (Vol. 1). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Farina, J., Scanlon, M., Le-Khac, N. -A., Kechadi, M., et al. (2015). Overview of the forensic investigation of cloud services. In 2015 10th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) (pp. 556–565). New York: IEEE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Fernandes, D. A.B., Soares, L. F. B., Gomes, J. V., Freire, M. M., Inácio, P. R. M. (2014). Security issues in cloud environments: A survey. International Journal of Information Security, 13(2), 113–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernandez, E. B., Monge, R., & Hashizume, K. (2016). Building a security reference architecture for cloud systems. Requirements Engineering, 21(2), 225–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koppell, J. G. S. (2005). Pathologies of accountability: Icann and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder”. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Malhotra, A., Van Gundy, M., Varia, M., Kennedy, H., Gardner, J., & Goldberg, S. (2016). The security of NTP’s datagram protocol. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2016/055. http://eprint.iacr.org/2016/055.

  15. Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2011). The NIST definition of cloud computing [online]. Available: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-145/SP800-145.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nakahara, S., & Ishimoto, H. (2010). A study on the requirements of accountable cloud services and log management. In 2010 8th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information and Telecommunication Technologies (APSITT) (pp. 1–6). New York: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  17. National Security Agency and Central Security Service. (2016). Information assurance directorate. https://cryptome.org/2016/01/CNSA-Suite-and-Quantum-Computing-FAQ.pdf, Accessed: 2016-09-27.

  18. NIST. (2010). Cloud computing. https://www.nist.gov/itl/cloud-computing. Accessed: 2016-05-27.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pawluk, P., Simmons, B., Smit, M., Litoiu, M., & Mankovski, S. (2012). Introducing stratos: A cloud broker service. In 2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Cloud Computing (pp. 891–898). New York: IEEE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Rochwerger, B., Breitgand, D., Levy, E., Galis, A., Nagin, K., Llorente, I. M., Montero, R., Wolfsthal, Y., Elmroth, E., Caceres, J., et al. (2009). The reservoir model and architecture for open federated cloud computing. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 53(4), 4–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodrigues, T. G. (2016). Cloudacc: A cloud-based accountability frameworkfor federated cloud. PhD Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sklavos, N., & Souras, P. (2006). Economic models & approaches in information security for computer networks. IJ Network Security, 2(1), 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Toosi, A. N., Calheiros, R. N., Buyya R. (2014). Interconnected cloud computing environments: Challenges, taxonomy, and survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 47(1), 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yao, J., Chen, S., Wang, C., Levy, D., & Zic, J. (2010). Accountability as a service for the cloud. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC) (pp. 81–88). New York: IEEE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thiago Gomes Rodrigues .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rodrigues, T.G., Endo, P.T., Beserra, D.W.S.C., Sadok, D., Kelner, J. (2018). Accountability for Federated Clouds. In: Daimi, K. (eds) Computer and Network Security Essentials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58424-9_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58424-9_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58423-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58424-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics