Abstract
Voicing one’s opinion, especially when it is not in conjunction with the opinion of the senior management, can be difficult in organizational contexts. Thus, platform facilitators in organizational participation processes might want to grant their users a way to communicate anonymously. However, this might have adverse effects, such as hoax and foul language. In this study, we describe the rigorous design process, evaluation and instantiation of an artifact that allows the postings of opinions and issues concerning the strategic and operational decisions in a public organization without revealing the identity of the author. Building on a thorough literature review and the involvement of key stakeholder groups allowed us to design and realize an artifact that mitigates the negative effects, while supporting reticent employees and those in fear of their superiors to speak their mind. We discuss both theoretical and practical implications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bock, L.: Work Rules!: Insights from Inside Google That Will Transform How You Live and Lead. Hodder and Stoughton, London (2016)
Behrendt, S., Richter, A., Trier, M.: Mixed methods analysis of enterprise social networks. Comput. Netw. 75, 560–577 (2014)
Cook, N.: Enterprise 2.0: How Social Software Will Change the Future of Work. Gower Publishing, Ltd., Farnham (2008)
Bughin, J., Chui, M., Pollak, L.: Organizing for change through social technologies. McKinsey Global survey results (2013)
Muller, M., Geyer, W., Soule, T., Daniels, S., Cheng, L.-T.: Crowdfunding inside the enterprise: employee-initiatives for innovation and collaboration. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 503–512 (2013)
Feldmann, N., Gimpel, H., Muller, M., Geyer, W.: Idea assessment via enterprise crowdfunding: an empirical analysis of decision-making styles. In: Proceedings of the Twenty Second European Conference on Information Systems, Tel Aviv, pp. 1–10 (2014)
Wagenknecht, T., Crommelinck, J., Teubner, T., Weinhardt, C.: Ideate. Collaborate. Repeat. A research agenda for idea generation, collaboration and evaluation in open innovation. In: 13th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (2017)
Wagenknecht, T., Filpe, R., Weinhardt, C.: Towards a design theory of computer-supported organizational participation. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 30, 188–202 (2017)
Connolly, T., Jessup, L.M., Valacich, J.S.: Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Manag. Sci. 36, 689–703 (1990)
Haines, R., Hough, J., Cao, L., Haines, D.: Anonymity in computer-mediated communication: more contrarian ideas with less influence. Group Decis. Negot. 23, 765–786 (2014)
Weisband, S., Kiesler, S.: Self disclosure on computer forms: meta-analysis and implications. In: Proceedings of the CHI 96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3–10. ACM (1996)
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., Loewenstein, G.: Privacy and human behaviour in the age of information. Science 347, 509–514 (2015)
Postmes, T., Lea, M.: Social processes and group decision making: anonymity in group decision support systems. Ergonomics 43, 1252–1274 (2000)
Valacich, J.S., Dennis, A.R., Nunamaker, J.F.: Group size and anonymity effects on computer-mediated idea generation. Small Group Res. 23, 49–73 (1992)
Sia, C.-L., Tan, B.C.Y., Wei, K.-K.: Group polarization and computer-mediated communication: effects of communication cues, social presence, and anonymity. Inf. Syst. Res. 13, 70–90 (2002)
Blohm, I., Riedl, C., Leimeister, J.M., Krcmar, H.: Idea evaluation mechanisms for collective intelligence in open innovation communities: do traders outperform raters? In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–24 (2011)
Leimeister, J.M.: Collective intelligence. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 4, 245–248 (2010)
Rapacon, S.: How using social media can get you fired (2016). http://www.cnbc.com/2016/02/05/how-using-social-media-can-get-you-fired.html
Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., McGuire, T.: Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 37, 157–187 (1986)
Cho, D., Kim, S., Acquisti, A.: Empirical analysis of online anonymity and user behaviors: the impact of real name policy. In: Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, pp. 3041–3050 (2012)
Charness, G., Gneezy, U.: What’s in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 68, 29–35 (2008)
Omernick, E., Sood, S.O.: The impact of anonymity in online communities. In: International Conference on Social Computing, pp. 526–535 (2013)
Kilner, P.G., Hoadley, C.M.: Anonymity options and professional participation in an online community of practice. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, pp. 272–280. International Society of the Learning Sciences (2005)
Valacich, J.S., Jessup, L.M., Dennis, A.R., Nunamaker, J.F.: A conceptual framework of anonymity in group support systems. Group Decis. Negot. 1, 219–241 (1992)
Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., de Groot, D.: Social influence in computer-mediated communication: the effects of anonymity on group behavior. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27, 1243–1254 (2001)
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–78 (2007)
Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The anatomy of a design theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8, 312–335 (2007)
Ulbrich, F.: Adopting shared services in a public-sector organization. Transform. Gov. People Process Policy 4, 249–265 (2010)
Mumford, E.: The story of socio-technical design: reflections on its successes, failures and potential. Inf. Syst. J. 16, 317–342 (2006)
Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37, 337–355 (2013)
Tumasjan, A., Strobel, M., Welpe, I.: Employer brand building for start-ups: which job attributes do employees value most. J. Bus. Econ. 81, 111–136 (2011)
Wilkinson, A., Gollan, P., Marchington, M., Lewin, D. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Participation in Organizations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)
Wegge, J., Jeppesen, H.J., Weber, W.G., Pearce, C.L., Silva, S.A., Pundt, A., Jonsson, T., Wolf, S., Wassenaar, C.L., Unterrainer, C., Piecha, A.: Promoting work motivation in organizations. J. Pers. Psychol. 9, 154–171 (2010)
Spreitzer, G.M.: Psychological empowerment in the workplace - dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Manag. J. 38, 1442–1465 (1995)
Humborstad, S.I.W.: When industrial democracy and empowerment go hand-in-hand. A co-power approach. Econ. Ind. Democr. 35, 391–411 (2014)
Briggs, R.O., Albrecht, C.C., Dean, D.R., Kolfschoten, G., de Vreede, G.-J., Lukosch, S.: A seven-layer model of collaboration: separation of concerns for designers of collaboration systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems 2009, pp. 1–14 (2009)
Urbach, N., Smolnik, S., Riempp, G.: Determining the improvement potentials of employee portals using a performance-based analysis. Bus. Process Manag. J. 17, 829–845 (2011)
Leonardi, P.M., Huysman, M., Steinfeld, C.: Enterprise social media: definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. J. Comput. Commun. 19, 1–19 (2013)
Leimeister, J.M., et al.: Leveraging crowdsourcing: activation-supporting components for IT-based ideas competition. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 26, 197–224 (2009)
Pedersen, J., Kocsis, D., Tripathi, A., Tarrell, A., Weerakoon, A., Tahmasbi, N., Xiong, J., Deng, W., Oh, O., De Vreede, G.J.: Conceptual foundations of crowdsourcing: a review of IS research. In: Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2013)
Adamczyk, S., Bullinger, A.C., Möslein, K.M.: Innovation contests: a review, classification and outlook. Creat. Innov. Manag. 21, 335–360 (2012)
Feldmann, N., Gimpel, H., Kohler, M., Weinhardt, C.: Using crowd funding for idea assessment inside organizations: lessons learned from a market engineering perspective. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Computing and its Applications, pp. 525–530 (2013)
Lakhani, K.R., Jeppesen, L.B.: Getting unusual suspects to solve R&D puzzles. Harv. Bus. Rev. 85, 30–32 (2007)
Poetz, M.K., Schreier, M.: The value of crowdsourcing: can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 29, 1–31 (2012)
Hrastinski, S., Kviselius, N.Z., Ozan, H., Edenius, M.: A review of technologies for open innovation: characteristics and future trends. In: Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2010)
Riedl, C., Blohm, I., Leimeister, J.M., Krcmar, H.: The effect of rating scales on decision quality and user attitudes in online innovation communities. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 17, 7–36 (2013)
Klein, M.: Enabling large-scale deliberation using attention-mediation metrics. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 21, 449–473 (2012)
Klein, M., Garcia, A.C.B.: High-speed idea filtering with the bag of lemons. Decis. Support Syst. 78, 39–50 (2015)
Ebner, W., Leimeister, J.M., Krcmar, H.: Community engineering for innovations: the ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations. R&D Manag. 39, 342–356 (2009)
Teubner, T., Adam, M.T.P., Camacho, S., Hassanein, K.: Understanding resource sharing in C2C platforms: the role of picture humanization. In: Proceedings of the Twentyfifth Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–10 (2014)
Marx, G.T.: What’s in a name? Some reflections on the sociology of anonymity. Inf. Soc. 15, 99–112 (1999)
Fogg, B.J., Tseng, H.: The elements of computer credibility. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 80–87 (1999)
Weber, C., Dunaway, J., Johnson, T.: It’s all in the name: source cue ambiguity and the persuasive appeal of campaign ads. J. Polit. Behav. 34, 561–584 (2012)
Jiang, Z.J., Choi, B.C.F.: Privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions. Inf. Syst. Res. 24, 579–595 (2013)
Short, J., Williams, E., Christie, B.: The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Wiley, New York (1976)
Argyle, M., Dean, J.: Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry 28, 289–304 (1965)
Jessup, L.M., Connolly, T., Galegher, J.: The effects of anonymity on GDSS group process with an idea-generating task. MIS Q. 14, 313–321 (1990)
Tu, C.-H., McIsaac, M.: The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. Am. J. Distance Educ. 16, 131–150 (2002)
Gefen, D., Straub, D.W.: Consumer trust in B2C e-commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-products and e-services. Omega 32, 407–424 (2004)
Hassanein, K., Head, M.: Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 65, 689–708 (2007)
Cyr, D., Head, M., Larios, H., Pan, B.: Exploring human images in website design: a multi-method approach. MIS Q. 33, 539–566 (2009)
Qiu, L., Benbasat, I.: A study of demographic embodiments of product recommendation agents in electronic commerce. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 68, 669–688 (2010)
Walther, J., Slovacek, C., Tidwell, L.: Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long-term and short-term computer-mediated communication. Commun. Res. 28, 105–134 (2001)
Di Blasio, P., Milani, L.: Computer-mediated communication and persuasion: peripheral vs. central route to opinion shift. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24, 798–815 (2008)
Koch, S., Mueller, B., Kruse, L., Zumbach, J.: Constructing gender in chat groups. Sex Roles 53, 29–41 (2005)
Nunamaker, J.F., Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., Vogel, D., George, J.: Electronic meeting systems. Commun. ACM 34, 40–61 (1991)
Niederman, F., March, S.T.: Design science and the accumulation of knowledge in the information systems discipline. ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. 3, 1:1–1:15 (2012)
Koufaris, M.: Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 13, 205–223 (2002)
Goldenson, D.R., Herbsleb, J.D.: After the appraisal: a systematic survey of process improvement, its benefits, and factors that influence success (1995)
Acknowledgements
This study was part of the joint research project “Participation as a Service” (PaaS), funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (under grant no. 01IS150120). We would like to thank our project partners at Liquid Democracy e.V., partou eG and HRpepper GmbH & Co. KGaA and the public organization as well as the two anonymous reviewers of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wagenknecht, T., Levina, O., Weinhardt, C. (2017). Designing Anonymous Collaboration in Computer-Supported Organizational Participation. In: Maedche, A., vom Brocke, J., Hevner, A. (eds) Designing the Digital Transformation. DESRIST 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10243. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59144-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59144-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59143-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59144-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)