Skip to main content

Multi-process Reporting and Analysis for Change Management and Performance Reviews

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Information Systems (BIS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 288))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1111 Accesses

Abstract

Business process design and governance are two important phases of Business Process Management (BPM). They are however usually performed using tools that tend to be too generic and technical for most business analysts. For instance, they promote Business Intelligence (BI) mechanisms to extract reports for the analysis of the executed processes, but they typically focus on one process definition at a time. This approach has shortcomings in organisations where there are large collections of processes that need to be managed consistently. In previous work, we proposed the generation of domain-specific studios, in order to enable analysts to design their processes in a much more intuitive way than with generic languages. This work is a logical continuation through the addition of domain-specific multi-process reporting and analysis. By defining analytics metrics in a domain-specific space, analysts are able to make business performance reviews and manage change in ways that apply directly and quickly to entire collections of process. The appropriateness and the feasibility of the approach are shown through a detailed use-case and a complete prototype implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.bizagi.com/.

  2. 2.

    http://pmsoft.com/.

  3. 3.

    http://www.bonitasoft.com/.

  4. 4.

    http://www.tibco.com/products/automation/business-process-management/nimbus.

References

  1. van der Aa, H., Leopold, H., Reijers, H.A.: Dealing with behavioral ambiguity in textual process descriptions. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9850, pp. 271–288. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.: Business process management: a comprehensive survey. ISRN Softw. Eng. 2013, 37 (2013). Article ID 507984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/507984

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dijkman, R.M., La Rosa, M., Reijers, H.A.: Managing large collections of business process models-current techniques and challenges. Comput. Ind. 63(2), 91–97 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eclipse-Fundation: Business Intelligence and Reporting Tools (BIRT) Project (2004). http://www.eclipse.org/birt/

  5. Eclipse-Fundation: Xtext (2006). http://www.eclipse.org/Xtext/

  6. Eclipse-Fundation: Sirius (2007). http://www.eclipse.org/sirius/

  7. Eclipse-Fundation: Mangrove (2009). https://www.eclipse.org/mangrove/

  8. Jablonski, S., Volz, B., Dornstauder, S.: Evolution of business process models and languages. In: 2nd International Conference on Business Process and Services Computing (BPSC), pp. 46–59. Citeseer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leopold, H., Smirnov, S., Mendling, J.: On the refactoring of activity labels in business process models. Inf. Syst. 37(5), 443–459 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mernik, M., Heering, J., Sloane, A.M.: When and how to develop domain-specific languages. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 37(4), 316–344 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Milani, F., Dumas, M., Ahmed, N., Matulevičius, R.: Modelling families of business process variants: a decomposition driven method. Inf. Syst. 56, 55–72 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mos, A.: Domain specific monitoring of business processes using concept probes. In: Toumani, F., et al. (eds.) ICSOC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8954, pp. 213–224. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22885-3_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Mos, A., Cortes-Cornax, M.: Business matter experts do matter: a model-driven approach for domain specific process design and monitoring. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNBIP, vol. 260, pp. 210–226. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45468-9_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Mos, A., Cortes-Cornax, M.: Generating domain-specific process studios. In: 20th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), pp. 1–10. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mos, A., Jacquin, T.: A platform-independent mechanism for deployment of business processes using abstract services. In: 17th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), pp. 71–78. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. OMG: Business process model and notation (BPMN) version 2.0 (2011). http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0

  17. Pinggera, J., Zugal, S., Weber, B., Fahland, D., Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: How the structuring of domain knowledge helps casual process modelers. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 445–451. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16373-9_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosemann, M.: Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part a. Bus. Process Manage. J. 12(2), 249–254 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosemann, M., Brocke, J.: The six core elements of business process management. In: Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 1. IHIS, pp. 105–122. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45100-3_5

    Google Scholar 

  20. Silver, B.: BPMN Method and Style: A Levels-Based Methodology for BPM Process Modeling and Improvement Using BPMN 2.0. Cody-Cassidy Press, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Steinberg, D., Budinsky, F., Merks, E., Paternostro, M.: EMF: Eclipse Modeling Framework. Pearson Education, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weber, B., Reichert, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Refactoring large process model repositories. Comput. Ind. 62(5), 467–486 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mario Cortes-Cornax or Adrian Mos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cortes-Cornax, M., Mos, A. (2017). Multi-process Reporting and Analysis for Change Management and Performance Reviews. In: Abramowicz, W. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 288. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59336-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59336-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59335-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59336-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics