Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Conference on Blended Learning

ICBL 2017: Blended Learning. New Challenges and Innovative Practices pp 236–246Cite as

Topic Classification on Short Reflective Writings for Monitoring Students’ Progress

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

  • 3173 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10309))

Abstract

Reflection has been widely considered as an important element in student learning in higher education. Among different forms of reflective writing, one-minute papers can quickly and easily get students to reflect on their learning. Unlike short quizzes, the responses to one-minute papers could cover a wide open range and could require more time to review and summarize. When one-minute papers are administrated online, their responses are available in electronic form and this facilitates a computational approach for analysis. In this paper, we propose a machine learning approach to analyzing the students’ responses to one-minute papers. We build a text classifier to identify the topics discussed in the responses. Our results of a preliminary study conducted in a blended learning course demonstrate that the classifier can effectively detect the topics and the proposed method can be used to monitor student progress based on the detected topics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.nltk.org .

  2. 2.

    http://scikit-learn.org .

References

  1. Anderson, D., Burns, S.: One-minute paper: student perception of learning gains. Coll. Stud. J. 47(1), 219–227 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angelo, T.A., Cross, K.P.: Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ashakiran, S., Deepthi, R.: One-minute paper: a thinking centered assessment tool. Int. J. Med. Update 8(2), 1–9 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barber, D.: Bayesian reasoning and machine learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Blei, D.M.: Probabilistic topic models. Commun. ACM 55(4), 77–84 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Burrows, S., Gurevych, I., Stein, B.: The eras and trends of automatic short answer grading. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 25(1), 60–117 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carless, D., Zhou, J.: Starting small in assessment change: short in-class written responses. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 41(7), 1114–1127 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, Y., Yu, B., Zhang, X., Yu, Y.: Topic modeling for evaluating students’ reflective writing: a case study of pre-service teachers’ journals. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, pp. 1–5 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cowan, J.: Noteworthy matters for attention in reflective journal writing. Act. Learn. High. Educ. 15(1), 53–64 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dos Santos, J.C.A., Favero, E.L.: Practical use of a latent semantic analysis (LSA) model for automatic evaluation of written answers. J. Braz. Comput. Soc. 21(1), 21 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Farrell, T.S.C.: Does writing promote reflective practice? In: Renandya, W.A., Widodo, H.P. (eds.) English Language Teaching Today. ELE, vol. 5, pp. 83–94. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38834-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Fink, L.D.: Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gibson, A., Kitto, K.: Analysing reflective text for learning analytics: an approach using anomaly recontextualisation. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 275–279 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Halverson, J.: Minute paper and interdisciplinary studies: pre-test/post-test study. J. High. Educ. Theory Pract. 14(3), 44 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hatton, N., Smith, D.: Reflection in teacher education: towards definition and implementation. Teach. Teach. Educ. 11(1), 33–49 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kwan, F.: Formative assessment: the one-minute paper vs. the daily quiz. J. Instr. Pedagogies 5, 1–8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Landauer, T.K., Foltz, P.W., Laham, D.: An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Process. 25(2–3), 259–284 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lengelle, R., Meijers, F., Poell, R., Post, M.: The effects of creative, expressive, and reflective writing on career learning: an explorative study. J. Vocat. Behav. 83(3), 419–427 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lucas, G.M.: Initiating student-teacher contact via personalized responses to one-minute papers. Coll. Teach. 58(2), 39–42 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mittal, H., Syamala Devi, M.: Computerized evaluation of subjective answers using hybrid technique. In: Saini, H.S., Sayal, R., Rawat, S.S. (eds.) Innovations in Computer Science and Engineering. AISC, vol. 413, pp. 295–303. Springer, Singapore (2016). doi:10.1007/978-981-10-0419-3_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., Zhu, W.J.: BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 311–318 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rogers, R.R.: Reflection in higher education: a concept analysis. Innov. High. Educ. 26(1), 37–57 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ryan, M., Ryan, M.: Theorising a model for teaching and assessing reflective learning in higher education. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 32(2), 244–257 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shum, S.B., Sándor, Á., Goldsmith, R., Wang, X., Bass, R., McWilliams, M.: Reflecting on reflective writing analytics: assessment challenges and iterative evaluation of a prototype tool. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, pp. 213–222 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stead, D.R.: A review of the one-minute paper. Act. Learn. High. Educ. 6(2), 118–131 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ullmann, T.D.: Keywords of written reflection – a comparison between reflective and descriptive datasets. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Technology Enhanced Learning, vol. 1465, pp. 83–96 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ullmann, T.D., Wild, F., Scott, P.: Comparing automatically detected reflective texts with human judgements. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Technology-Enhanced Learning, pp. 101–116 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vonderwell, S.: Assessing online learning and teaching: Adapting the minute paper. TechTrends 48(4), 29–31 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vonderwell, S.K., Boboc, M.: Promoting formative assessment in online teaching and learning. TechTrends 57(4), 22–27 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wade, R.C., Yarbrough, D.B.: Portfolios: A tool for reflective thinking in teacher education? Teach. Teach. Educ. 12(1), 63–79 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Whittard, D.: Reflections on the one-minute paper. Int. Rev. Econ. Educ. 20, 1–12 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wolff, M., Wagner, M.J., Poznanski, S., Schiller, J., Santen, S.: Not another boring lecture: Engaging learners with active learning techniques. J. Emerg. Med. 48(1), 85–93 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wolstenholme, J.: Evidence based practice using formative assessment in library research support. Evid. Libr. Inf. Pract. 10(3), 4–29 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics and Information Technology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Leonard K. M. Poon & Gary Cheng

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Zichao Li

Authors
  1. Leonard K. M. Poon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zichao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gary Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonard K. M. Poon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The Open University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Simon K.S. Cheung

  2. City University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong, China

    Lam-for Kwok

  3. Hong Kong Shue Yan University , Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Will W.K. Ma

  4. The Open University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Lap-Kei Lee

  5. State University of New York at Oswego , Oswego, New York, USA

    Harrison Yang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Poon, L.K.M., Li, Z., Cheng, G. (2017). Topic Classification on Short Reflective Writings for Monitoring Students’ Progress. In: Cheung, S., Kwok, Lf., Ma, W., Lee, LK., Yang, H. (eds) Blended Learning. New Challenges and Innovative Practices. ICBL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10309. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59360-9_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59360-9_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59359-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59360-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation