Abstract
The actualisation of an information-rich, expansive and complex battlespace have rendered current Tactical Information Assessment (TIA) within tactical systems as non-effective. Existing TIA techniques and algorithms perform limited cognitive processing because they lack fundamental characteristics of Situation Management (SM). In consequence, a dramatic reduction of situation awareness, information and decision superiority of the operators and the overall tactical system has emerged. Considerable attention in applying computational cognitive architectures and processing and SM within TIA has been gaining momentum.
This paper discusses the Cognitive Architecture for Tactical Information Assessment (CATIA), a proposed Multi-Agent System (MAS)-based cognitive architecture. CATIA employs cognitive architecture design principles and the Belief, Desire and Intention (BDI) framework to facilitate recognition and reasoning to deliberate in tactical situations and events. CATIA will be implemented within the Future Integrated Mission System (FIMS) to illustrate how superior TIA methodologies can dramatically improve information assessment, situation awareness and information and decision superiority within tactical systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, J.: The Architecture of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1983)
Anderson, J., Lebiere, C.: The Atomic Components of Thought. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1998)
Blasch, E., Kadar, I., Salerno, J., Kokar, M., Das, S., Powell, G., Corkill, D., Ruspini, E.: Issues and challenges in situation assessment (level 2 fusion). J. Adv. Inf. Fusion 1(2), 122–139 (2006)
Buford, J., Jakobson, G., Lewis, L.: Extending BDI multi-agent systems with situation management. In: 9th International Conference on Information Fusion (2006)
Fischer, Y., Bauer, A., Beyerer, J.: A conceptual framework for automatic situation assessment. In: CogSIMA 2011: 2011 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (2011)
Gluck, K.: Cogitive architectures for human factors in aviation. In: Human Factors in Aviation, pp. 375–398. Academic Press (2010)
Holsopple, J., Sudit, M.: Enhancing situation awareness via automated situation assessment. IEEE Commun. Mag. 48, 146–152 (2010)
Jakobson, G.: On conceptualization of eventualities in situation management. In: CogSIMA 2013: IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (2013)
Jakobson, G., Buford, J., Lewis, L.: A framework of cognitive situation modeling and recognition. In: MILCOM 2006: IEEE Military Communications Conference (2006)
Jones, R., Wray III, R., van Lent, M.: Practical evalution of integrated cognitive systems. Adv. Cogn. Syst. 1, 83–92 (2012)
Laird, J., Wray III, R.: Cognitive architecture requirements for achieveing AGI. In: AGI-2010: 3rd International Conference on Artificial General Intelligence (2010)
Langley, P., Choi, D.: A unified cognitive architecture for physical agents. In: National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2006)
Langley, P., Laird, J., Rogers, S.: Cognitive architectures: research issues and challenges. Cogn. Syst. Res. 10, 141–160 (2009)
Laudy, C., Mattioli, J., Museux, N.: Cognitive situation awarness for information superiority. In: Information Fusion for Command Support (2006)
Looney, C., Liang, L.: Cognitive situation and threat assessment of ground battlespace. Inf. Fusion 4, 297–308 (2003)
Newell, A.: Unified Theories of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Nunes, I., de Lucena, J., Luck, M.: BDI4Jade: a BDI layer on top of Jade. In: ProMAS 2011: 9th International Workshop on Programming Multi-agent Systems (2011)
Powell, G.: Tactical situation assessment challenges and implications for computational support. In: 8th International Conference on Information Fusion (2005)
Salerno, J., Yang, S., Kadar, I., Sudit, M., Tadda, G.P., Holsopple, J.: Issues and challenges in higher level fusion: threat/impact assessment and intent modeling. In: 13th Conference on Information Fusion (2010)
Steinberg, A., Bowman, C., White, F.: Rethinking the JDL data fusion levels. In: 2004 National Symposium on Sensor and Data Fusion (2004)
Sun, R.: Desiderata for cognitive architectures. Philos. Psychol. 17(3), 342–373 (2004)
Sun, R.: The CLARION cognitive architecture: extending cognitive modeling to social simulation. In: Sun, R. (ed.) Cognition and Multi-agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation. Cambridge University Press (2006)
Sun, R.: The challenges of building computational cognitive architectures. Stud. Comput. Intell. 63, 37–60 (2007)
Taatgen, N., Anderson, J.: The past, present and future of cognitive architectures. Top. Cogn. Sci. 2, 693–704 (2010)
Taatgen, N., Lebiere, C., Anderson, J.: Modeling paradigms in ACT-R. In: Cognition and Multi-agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation. Cambridge University Press (2006)
Wray, R., Jones, R.: Considering soar as an agent architecture. In: Sun, R. (ed.) Cognition and Multi-agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation. Cambridge University Press (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Consoli, A. (2018). Enhancing Tactical Information Assessment Using an Agent-Based Cognitive Architecture. In: Jezic, G., Kusek, M., Chen-Burger, YH., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds) Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technology and Applications. KES-AMSTA 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 74. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59394-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59394-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59393-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59394-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)