Skip to main content

Using Constraint Logic Programming for the Verification of Customized Decision Models for Clinical Guidelines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10259))

Abstract

Computer-interpretable implementations of clinical guidelines (CIGs) add knowledge that is outside the scope of the original guideline. This knowledge can customize CIGs to patients’ psycho-social context or address comorbidities that are common in the local population, potentially increasing standardization of care and patient compliance. We developed a two-layered contextual decision-model based on the PROforma CIG formalism that separates the primary knowledge of the original guideline from secondary arguments for or against specific recommendations. In this paper we show how constraint logic programming can be used to verify the layered model for two essential properties: (1) secondary arguments do not rule in recommendations that are ruled out in the original guideline, and (2) the CIG is complete in providing recommendation(s) for any combination of patient data items considered. We demonstrate our approach when applied to the asthma domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Institute of Medicine: Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fux, A., Peleg, M., Soffer, P.: How does personal information affect clinical decision making? Eliciting categories of personal context and effects. In: AMIA Annual Symposium, p. 1741 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Quinn, C.C., Gruber-Baldini, A.L., Shardell, M., Weed, K., Clough, S.S., Peeples, M., Terrin, M., Bronich-Hall, L., Barr, E., Lender, D.: Mobile diabetes intervention study: testing a personalized treatment/behavioral communication intervention for blood glucose control. Contemp. Clin. Trials 30(4), 334–346 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sutton, D.R., Fox, J.: The syntax and semantics of the PROforma guideline modeling language. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10(5), 433–443 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Riano, D., Real, F., Lopez-Vallverdu, J.A., Campana, F., Ercolani, S., Mecocci, P., Annicchiarico, R., Caltagirone, C.: An ontology-based personalization of health-care knowledge to support clinical decisions for chronically ill patients. J. Biomed. Inform. 45(3), 429–446 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grandi, F.: Dynamic class hierarchy management for multi-version ontology-based personalization. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 82(1 Part A), 69–90 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Grandi, F., Mandreoli, F., Martoglia, R.: Efficient management of multi-version clinical guidelines. J. Biomed. Inform. 45(6), 1120–1136 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Michalowski, M., Wilk, S., Rosu, D., Kezadri, M., Michalowski, W., Carrier, M.: Expanding a first-order logic mitigation framework to handle multimorbid patient preferences. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 2015, pp. 895–904 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peleg, M.: Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: a methodological review. J. Biomed. Inform. 46(4), 744–763 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilk, S., Michalowski, W., Michalowski, M., Farion, K., Hing, M.M., Mohapatra, S.: Mitigation of adverse interactions in pairs of clinical practice guidelines using constraint logic programming. J. Biomed. Inform. 46(2), 341–353 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Perez, B., Porres, I.: Authoring and verification of clinical guidelines: a model driven approach. J. Biomed. Inform. 43(4), 520–536 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ten Teije, A., Marcos, M., Balser, M., van Croonenborg, J., Duelli, C., van Harmelen, F., Lucas, P., Miksch, S., Reif, W., Rosenbrand, K., Seyfang, A.: Improving medical protocols by formal methods. Artif. Intell. Med. 36(3), 193–209 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Halpern, J.Y., Vardi, M.Y.: Model checking vs. theorem proving: a manifesto. In: Vladimir, L. (ed.) Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Theory of Computation, pp. 151–176. Academic Press Professional, Inc., Cambridge (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Dechter, R.: Constraint Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Nethercote, N., Stuckey, P.J., Becket, R., Brand, S., Duck, G.J., Tack, G.: MiniZinc: towards a standard CP modelling language. In: Bessière, C. (ed.) CP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4741, pp. 529–543. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74970-7_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. British Thoracic Society and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, QRG 141 - British Guideline on the Management of Asthma (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Israel Medical Association: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Asthma Management. Harefuah (2000). (in Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Szymon Wilk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wilk, S., Fux, A., Michalowski, M., Peleg, M., Soffer, P. (2017). Using Constraint Logic Programming for the Verification of Customized Decision Models for Clinical Guidelines. In: ten Teije, A., Popow, C., Holmes, J., Sacchi, L. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10259. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59758-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59758-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59757-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59758-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics