Skip to main content

Compensated Row-Column Ultrasound Imaging System Using Three Dimensional Random Fields

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Image Analysis and Recognition (ICIAR 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 10317))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2636 Accesses

Abstract

The row-column method received a lot of attention for 3-D ultrasound imaging. This simplification technique reduces the number of connections required to address a 2-D array and therefore reduces the amount of data to handle. However, Row-column ultrasound imaging still has its limitations: the issues of data sparsity, speckle noise, and the spatially varying point spread function with edge artifacts must all be taken into account when building a reconstruction framework. In this work, we introduce a compensated row-column ultrasound imaging system, termed 3D-CRC, that leverages 3-D information within an extended 3-D random field model to compensate for the intrinsic limitations of row-column method. Tests on 3D-CRC and previously published row-column ultrasound imaging systems show the potential of our proposed system as an effective tool for enhancing 3-D row-column imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Smith, R.A., Nelson, L.J.: 2D transmission imaging with a crossed-array configuration for defect detection. Insight J. Br. Inst. NDT 51, 82–87 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Szabo, T.L.: Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: Inside Out. Elsevier Academic Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rasmussen, M., Christiansen, T., Thomsem, E., Jensen, J.: 3-D imaging using row-column-addressed arrays with integrated apodization - part I: apodization design and line element beamforming. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 62(5), 947–958 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, A., Wong, L., Logan, A., Yeow, J.T.W.: A CMUT-based real-time volumetric ultrasound imaging system with row-column addressing. IEEE Int. Ultrason. Symp. 1, 1755–1758 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christiansen, T., et al.: 3-D imaging using row-column-addressed arrays with integrated apodization - part II: transducer fabrication and experimental results. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 62(5), 959–971 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Daya, I.B., Chen, A.I.H., Shafiee, M.J., Wong, A., Yeow, J.T.W.: Compensated row-column ultrasound imaging system using fisher tippett multilayered conditional random field model. PLoS One 10(12), e0142817 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Michailovich, O., Tannenbaum, A.: Despeckling of medical ultrasound images. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 53(1), 64–78 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jensen, J.A.: Linear descriptions of ultrasound imaging systems. Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Black, A., Kohli, P., Rother, C.: Markov Random Fields for Vision and Image Processing. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Dolui, S.: Variable splitting as a key to efficient image reconstruction. Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sanches, J., Bioucas-Dias, J., Marques, J.: Minimum total variation in 3D-ultrasound reconstruction. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process. 3, 597–600 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lafferty, J.D., McCallum, A., Pereira, F.C.N.: Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 282–289 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kazemzadeh, F., Shafiee, M.J., Wong, A., Clausi, D.A.: Reconstruction of compressive multispectral sensing data using a multilayered conditional random field approach. In: SPIE Proceedings, vol. 9217 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shafiee, M.J., Wong, A., Siva, P., Fieguth, P.: Efficient Bayesian inference using fully connected conditional random fields with stochastic cliques. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 4289–4293 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Broomand, A., et al.: Multi-penalty conditional random field approach to super-resolved reconstruction of optical coherence tomography images. Biomed. Optics Express 4(10), 2032–2050 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanaka, K., Kataoka, S., Yasuda, M.: Statistical performance analysis by loopy belief propagation in Bayesian image modeling. J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 233(1), 012013 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yao, F., Qian, Y., Hu, Z., Li, J.: A novel hyperspace remote sensing images classification using Gaussian processes with conditional random fields. In: International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering, pp. 197–202 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jensen, J.: FIELD: a program for simulating ultrasound systems. In: 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging Published in Medical Biological Engineering Computing, vol. 34, pp. 351–353 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Achim, A., Bezerianos, A., Tsakalides, P.: Novel Bayesian multiscale method for speckle removal in medical ultrasound images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20(8), 772–783 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shruthi, G., Usha, B.S., Sandya, S.: A novel approach for speckle reduction and enhancement of ultrasound images. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 45(20), 14–20 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wu, S., Zhu, Q., Xie, Y.: Evaluation of various speckle reduction filters on medical ultrasound images. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 1148–1151, July 2013

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sivakumar, R., Gayathri, M.K., Nedumaran, D.: Speckle filtering of ultrasound B-scan images- a comparative study between spatial and diffusion filters. In: IEEE Conference on Open Systems, pp. 80–85, December 2010

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nageswari, C., Prabha, K.: Despeckle process in ultrasound fetal image using hybrid spatial filters. In: International Conference on Green Computing, Communication and Conservation of Energy, pp. 174–179, December 2013

    Google Scholar 

  24. Srivastava, R., Gupta, J., Parthasarthy, H.: Comparison of PDE based on other techniques for speckle reduction from digitally reconstructed holographic images. Opt. Lasers Eng. 48(5), 626–635 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Michailovich, O., Tannenbaum, A.: Blind deconvolution of medical ultrasound images: a parametric inverse filtering approach. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16(12), 3005–3019 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Rasmussen, M., Jensen, J.: 3-D ultrasound imaging performance of a row-column addressed 2-D array transducer: a measurement study. In: IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 1460–1463 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xu, L., et al.: Oil spill candidate detection from SAR imagery using a thresholding-guided stochastically fully-connected conditional random field model. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), pp. 79–86 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shafiee, M.J., Chung A.G., Wong, A., Fieguth P.: Improved fine structure modeling via guided stochastic clique formation in fully connected conditional random fields. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 3260–3264 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Canada Research Chairs Program, and the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibrahim Ben Daya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Daya, I.B., Chen, A.I.H., Shafiee, M.J., Wong, A., Yeow, J.T.W. (2017). Compensated Row-Column Ultrasound Imaging System Using Three Dimensional Random Fields. In: Karray, F., Campilho, A., Cheriet, F. (eds) Image Analysis and Recognition. ICIAR 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10317. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59876-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59876-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59875-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59876-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics