Skip to main content

Comparison of Word Embeddings from Different Knowledge Graphs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Language, Data, and Knowledge (LDK 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10318))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper focuses on the manipulation of a WordNet-based knowledge graph by adding, changing and combining various semantic relations. This is done in the context of measuring similarity and relatedness between words, based on word embedding representations trained on a pseudo corpus generated from the knowledge graph. The UKB tool is used for generating pseudo corpora that are then used for learning word embeddings. The results from the performed experiments show that the addition of more relations generally improves performance along both dimensions – similarity and relatedness. In line with previous research, our survey confirms that paradigmatic relations predominantly improve similarity, while syntagmatic relations benefit relatedness scores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.babelfy.org/.

  2. 2.

    http://www.babelnet.org/.

  3. 3.

    http://ixa2.si.ehu.es/ukb/.

  4. 4.

    Downloaded from http://alfonseca.org/eng/research/wordsim353.html.

  5. 5.

    Downloaded from https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~fh295/simlex.html.

  6. 6.

    https://code.google.com/archive/p/word2vec/.

  7. 7.

    The models are downloaded from here https://github.com/3Top/word2vec-api.

  8. 8.

    http://ixa2.si.ehu.es/ukb/.

References

  1. Agirre, E., López de Lacalle, O., Soroa, A.: Random walks for knowledge-based word sense disambiguation. Comput. Linguist. 40(1), 57–84 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agirre, E., Soroa, A.: Personalizing PageRank for word sense disambiguation. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL, EACL 2009, pp. 33–41 (2009). http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/E09-1005

  3. Fellbaum, C. (ed.): WordNet An Electronic Lexical Database. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1998). http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=8106

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Goikoetxea, J., Agirre, E., Soroa, A.: Single or multiple? Combining word representations independently learned from text and WordNet. In: AAAI, pp. 2608–2614. AAAI Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goikoetxea, J., Soroa, A., Agirre, E.: Random walks and neural network language models on knowledge bases. In: HLT-NAACL, The Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1434–1439 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hill, F., Reichart, R., Korhonen, A.: Simlex-999: evaluating semantic models with (genuine) similarity estimation. In: Computational Linguistics (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hirst, G., St-Onge, D.: Lexical chains as representations of context for the detection and correction of malapropisms. In: Fellbaum, C. (ed.) WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, pp. 305–332. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iacobacci, I., Pilehvar, M.T., Navigli, R.: Sensembed: learning sense embeddings for word and relational similarity. In: ACL, vol. 1, pp. 95–105 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mihalcea, R., Moldovan, D.I.: Extended WordNet: progress report. In: Proceedings of NAACL Workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Resources, pp. 95–100 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. CoRR abs/1301.3781 (2013). http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781

  11. Miller, G.A., Leacock, C., Tengi, R., Bunker, R.T.: A semantic concordance. In: Proceedings of HLT 1993, pp. 303–308 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1075671.1075742

  12. Ponzetto, S.P., Navigli, R.: Knowledge-rich word sense disambiguation rivaling supervised systems. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2010, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 1522–1531 (2010). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1858681.1858835

  13. Ristoski, P., Paulheim, H.: RDF2Vec: RDF Graph Embeddings for Data Mining. Springer, Cham (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46523-4_30

    Google Scholar 

  14. Salahli, M.A.: An approach for measuring semantic relatedness between words via related terms. Math. Comput. Appl. 14(1), 55–63 (2009). http://www.mcajournal.org/volume14/Vol14No1p.55.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  15. Simov, K., Osenova, P., Popov, A.: Using Context Information for Knowledge-Based Word Sense Disambiguation. Springer, Cham (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44748-3_13

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Simov, K., Popov, A., Osenova, P.: Improving word sense disambiguation with linguistic knowledge from a sense annotated treebank. Proc. RANLP 2015, 596–603 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simov, K., Popov, A., Osenova, P.: The role of the WordNet relations in the knowledge-based word sense disambiguation task. In: Proceedings of Eighth Global WordNet Conference, pp. 391–398 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has received partial support by the grant 02/12—Deep Models of Semantic Knowledge (DemoSem), funded by the Bulgarian National Science Fund in 2017–2019. We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their remarks, comments, and suggestions. All errors remain our own responsibility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiril Simov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Simov, K., Osenova, P., Popov, A. (2017). Comparison of Word Embeddings from Different Knowledge Graphs. In: Gracia, J., Bond, F., McCrae, J., Buitelaar, P., Chiarcos, C., Hellmann, S. (eds) Language, Data, and Knowledge. LDK 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10318. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59888-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59888-8_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59887-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59888-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics