Skip to main content

An Analysis of Group Recommendation Heuristics for High- and Low-Involvement Items

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence: From Theory to Practice (IEA/AIE 2017)

Abstract

Group recommender systems are based on aggregation heuristics that help to determine a recommendation for a group. These heuristics aggregate the preferences of individual users in order to reflect the preferences of the whole group. There exist a couple of different aggregation heuristics (e.g., most pleasure, least misery, and average voting) that are applied in group recommendation scenarios. However, to some extent it is still unclear which heuristics should be applied in which context. In this paper, we analyze the impact of the item domain (low involvement vs. high involvement) on the appropriateness of aggregation heuristics (we use restaurants as an example of low-involvement items and shared apartments as an example of high-involvement ones). The results of our study show that aggregation heuristics in group recommendation should be tailored to the underlying item domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The work presented in this paper has been partially conducted within the scope of the research projects WeWant (basic research project funded by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency) and OpenReq (Horizon 2020 project funded by the European Union).

  2. 2.

    Graz University of Technology (http://www.tugraz.at) and Alpen-Adria Universität Klagenfurt (http://www.aau.at).

References

  1. Herlocker, J., Terveen, L., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22(1), 5–53 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jameson, A., Smyth, B.: Recommendation to groups. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) The Adaptive Web. LNCS, vol. 4321, pp. 596–627. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Jameson, A.: More than the sum of its members: challenges for group recommender systems. In: Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI 2004, pp. 48–54. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jameson, A., Willemsen, M.C., Felfernig, A., Gemmis, M., Lops, P., Semeraro, G., Chen, L.: Human decision making and recommender systems. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 611–648. Springer, Boston, MA (2015). doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Jannach, D., Zanker, M., Felfernig, A., Friedrich, G.: Recommender Systems: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Masthoff, J.: Group modeling: selecting a sequence of television items to suit a group of viewers. UMUAI 14(1), 37–85 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Masthoff, J.: The user as wizard: A method for early involvement in the design and evaluation of adaptive systems. In: 5th Workshop on User-Centered Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Systems (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Masthoff, J.: Group recommender systems: combining individual models. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 677–702. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. McCarthy, K., Salamo, M., Coyle, L., McGinty, L., Smyth, B., Nixon, P.: Group recommender systems: a critiquing based approach. In: IUI 2006. ACM, pp. 267–269 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ninaus, G., Felfernig, A., Stettinger, M., Reiterer, S., Leitner, G., Weninger, L., Schanil, W.: Intelligent techniques for software requirements engineering. In: In European Conference on AI, Prestigious Applications of Intelligent Systems (PAIS), pp. 1161–1166 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. O’Connor, M., Cosley, D., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: PolyLens: A recommmender system for groups of users. In: European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 199–218. ACM (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Payne, J., Bettman, J., Johnson, E.: The Adaptive Decision Maker. Campridge University Press, New York (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Petty, R., Cacioppo, J., Schumann, D.: Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: the moderating role of involvement. J. Consum. Res. 10, 135–146 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Simon, H.: A behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Economics 69, 99–118 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stettinger, M., Felfernig, A., Leitner, G., Reiterer, S.: Counteracting anchoring effects in group decision making. In: Ricci, F., Bontcheva, K., Conlan, O., Lawless, S. (eds.) UMAP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9146, pp. 118–130. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20267-9_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Stettinger, M., Felfernig, A., Leitner, G., Reiterer, S., Jeran, M.: Counteracting serial position effects in the CHOICLA group decision support environment. In: 20th ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 2015), Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pp. 148–157. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muesluem Atas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Felfernig, A., Atas, M., Tran, T.N.T., Stettinger, M., Erdeniz, S.P., Leitner, G. (2017). An Analysis of Group Recommendation Heuristics for High- and Low-Involvement Items. In: Benferhat, S., Tabia, K., Ali, M. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence: From Theory to Practice. IEA/AIE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10350. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60042-0_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60042-0_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60041-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60042-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics