Skip to main content

A Multi-Criteria Decision Support Framework for Interactive Adaptive Systems Evaluation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Artificial Intelligence: From Theory to Practice (IEA/AIE 2017)

Abstract

Many usability evaluation methods for interactive adaptive systems exist in the literature. There is not yet an agreement in the adaptive system community about which method is more useful than another in specific evaluation situations. This raises the question, “What is (are) the best evaluation method(s) that need(s) to be used in specific evaluation constraints?” This paper presents possible directions to address this issue by proposing a multi-criteria decision support framework for selecting the appropriate evaluation methods for interactive adaptive systems. The proposed decision support framework is applied to determine the suitable usability evaluation methods for a specific adaptation layer of a given adaptive hypermedia system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jameson, A.: Adaptive interfaces and agents. In: Jacko, J.A., Sears, A. (eds.) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, pp. 305–330. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paramythis, A., Weibelzahl, S., Masthoff, J.: Layered evaluation of interactive adaptive systems: framework and formative methods. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 20, 383–453 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gena, C., Weibelzahl, S.: Usability engineering for the adaptive web. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) The Adaptive Web: Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization, pp. 720–762 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brusilovsky, P., Karagiannidis, C., Sampson, D.: The benefits of layered evaluation of adaptive applications and services. In: Weibelzahl, S., Chin, D.N., Weber, G. (eds.) Empirical Evaluation of Adaptive Systems, Proceedings of Workshop at the Eighth International Conference on User Modeling, UM2001, pp. 1–8 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Totterdell, P., Boyle, E.: The evaluation of adaptive systems. In: Browne, D., Totterdell, P., Norman, M. (eds.) Adaptive User Interfaces, pp. 161–194. Academic Press, London (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Van Velsen, L., Van der Geest, T., Klaassen, R., Steehouder, M.: User-centered evaluation of adaptive and adaptable systems: a literature review. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 23, 261–281 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mulwa, C., Lawless, S., Sharp, M., Wade, V.: The evaluation of adaptive and user-adaptive systems: a review. Int. J. Knowl. Web Intell. 2, 138–156 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gena, C.: Methods and techniques for the evaluation of user-adaptive systems. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 20, 1–37 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dhouib, A., Trabelsi, A., Kolski, C., Neji, M.: A classification and comparison of usability evaluation methods for interactive adaptive systems. In: 9th International Conference on Human System Interactions, Portsmouth, UK, pp. 246–251 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ferré, X., Bevan, N., Escobar, T.A.: UCD method selection with usability planner. In: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferre, X., Bevan, N.: Usability planner: a tool to support the process of selecting usability methods. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6949, pp. 652–655. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23768-3_105

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Dhouib, A., Trablesi, A., Kolski, C., Neji, M.: An approach for the selection of evaluation methods for interactive adaptive systems using analytic hierarchy process. In: IEEE Tenth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, 1–3 June, Grenoble, France, pp. 1–10 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karagiannidis, C., Sampson, D.G.: Layered evaluation of adaptive applications and services. In: Brusilovsky, P., Stock, O., Strapparava, C. (eds.) AH 2000. LNCS, vol. 1892, pp. 343–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). doi:10.1007/3-540-44595-1_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Manouselis, N., Karagiannidis, C., Sampson, D.G.: Layered evaluation for data discovery and recommendation systems an initial set of principles. In: IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 518–519 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta. A., Grover, P.: Proposed evaluation framework for adaptive hypermedia systems. In: 3rd Workshop on Empirical Evaluation of Adaptive Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands, pp. 161–171 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tarpin-Bernard, F., Marfisi-Schottman, I., Habieb-Mammar, H.: AnAmeter: the first steps to evaluating adaptation. In: 6th Workshop on User-Centred Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Systems at UMAP2009, Trento, Italy, pp. 11–20 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mulwa, C., Wade, V.: A web-based evaluation framework for supporting novice and expert evaluators of adaptive e-Learning systems. In: International Conference on e-Technologies and Business on the Web (EBW201z3), Thailand, pp. 62–67 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill International, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Omkarprasad, S.V., Kumar, S.: Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169, 1–29 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Saaty, T.L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1, 83–98 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Krueger, R., Casey, M.: Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Los Angeles (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nielsen, J.: Heuristic evaluation. In: Nielsen, J., Mack, R.L. (eds.) Usability Inspection Methods, pp. 25–64. Wiley, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mahatody, T., Sagar, M., Kolski, C.: State of the art on the cognitive walkthrough method, its variants and evolutions. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 26(8), 741–785 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Masthoff, J.: The user as wizard: a method for early involvement in the design and evaluation of adaptive systems. In: 5th Workshop on User- Centred Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Systems at AH 2006, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 460–469 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amira Dhouib .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dhouib, A., Trabelsi, A., Kolski, C., Neji, M. (2017). A Multi-Criteria Decision Support Framework for Interactive Adaptive Systems Evaluation. In: Benferhat, S., Tabia, K., Ali, M. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence: From Theory to Practice. IEA/AIE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10350. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60042-0_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60042-0_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60041-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60042-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics