Skip to main content

Volunteered Geographic Information Management Supported by Fuzzy Ontologies and Level-Based Approximate Reasoning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence: From Theory to Practice (IEA/AIE 2017)

Abstract

The paper proposes level-based approximate reasoning on a fuzzy ontology as a modeling framework to support the creation and retrieval of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) affected by observation deficiencies causing both uncertainty and fuzziness. The paper recalls the inadequacy of classic ontologies to create VGI, the limitation of the use of fuzzy ontologies to model both fuzziness and uncertainty, and proposes level based reasoning to answer user queries on a VGI collection supported by a fuzzy ontology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: The fuzzy ontology reasoner fuzzyDL. Knowl. Based Syst. 95, 12–34 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bordogna, G., Carrara, P., Criscuolo, L., Pepe, M., Rampini, A.: On predicting and improving the quality of volunteer geographic information projects. Int. J. Digital Earth 9, 1–22 (2014). on-line edition

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bordogna, G., Pasi, G.: Modeling linguistic qualifiers of uncertainty in a Fuzzy database. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 15, 995–1014 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bordogna, G., Pasi, G.: Modeling preferences in fuzzy queries by tuning the evaluation function of selection conditions. In: Proceedings of IFSA 2003, pp. 296–299, 29 June–2 July 2003, Istanbul (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cho, W.C., Richards, D.: Ontology construction and concept reuse with formal concept analysis for improved web document retrieval. Web Intell. Agent Syst. Int. J. 5, 109–126 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crall, A.W., Newman, G.J., Stohlgren, T.J., Holfelder, K.A., Graham, J., Waller, D.M.: Assessing citizen science data quality: an invasive species case study. Conserv. Lett. 4(6), 433–442 (2011). Blackwell Publishing Inc., 1755-263X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubois, A., Raymond, O., Remay, A., Bendahmane, L.M.: Genomic approach to study floral development genes in Rosa sp. PLoS One 6(12), e28455 (2011). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gonzalez, A., Marın, N., Pons, O., Vila, M.A.: Fuzzy certainty on fuzzy values. Control Cybern. 38(2), 311–339 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodchild, M.F.: Citizens as voluntary sensors: spatial data infrastructure in the world of web 2.0. Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastruct. Res. 2, 24–32 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haklay, M.: Citizen science and volunteered geographic information – overview and typology of participation. In: Sui, D.Z., Elwood, S., Goodchild, M.F. (eds.) Volunteered Geographic Information, Public Participation, and Crowdsourced Production of Geographic Knowledge. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Rudolph, S.: OWL 2 web ontology language primer. W3C recommendation (2009a). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/. Cited on page(s) 11

  12. Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Rudolph, S.: Foundations of Semantic Web Technologies. Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York (2009b). Cited on page(s) 11, 18

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schade, S., Tsinaraki, C.: Survey report: data management in Citizen Science projects. JRC Technical report for European Commission (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Straccia, U.: Towards a fuzzy description logic for the semantic web. In: Gomez-Perez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 167–181. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Straccia, U.: All about fuzzy description logics and applications. In: Faber, W., Paschke, A. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2015. LNCS, pp. 1–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21768-0

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. http://www.inaturalist.org/. Accessed 8 Aug 2016

Download references

Aknowledgements

The work presented in the paper has been partially supported by the projects FHfFC, jointly funded by CNR and Regione Lombardia, and STRESS funded by Cariplo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gloria Bordogna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bordogna, G., Sterlacchini, S. (2017). Volunteered Geographic Information Management Supported by Fuzzy Ontologies and Level-Based Approximate Reasoning. In: Benferhat, S., Tabia, K., Ali, M. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence: From Theory to Practice. IEA/AIE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10350. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60042-0_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60042-0_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60041-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60042-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics