Abstract
Creating rewarding and resonant user experiences usually requires a designerly approach, that is, to explore multiple ideas and later converge to a specific design outcome that can be eventually implemented. Engaging novice designers as well as end users in fuzzy ideation processes can cause participants’ discouragement and disengagement when they do not understand the goal of the various design tasks and the contribution of such tasks to the whole development process. To mitigate this problem, we propose two software tools (called CoDICE and ECCE) to support the ideation, design and early prototyping of augmented experiences. The tools make it possible to apply generative techniques to promote creativity whilst providing a virtual space where ideas and designs can be persistently documented and developed further. The creation of physical prototypes is supported to close the loop, thus enabling end users to ideate, design and prototype their own augmented experiences. Tools were tested with end users who valued (i) to have a process flow to follow, (ii) to be able to explore multiples ideas and interrelate them and, finally, (iii) to create their own working prototypes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, R. S., Daly, S. R., Mann, L. M., Dall’Alba, G. (2011). Being a professional: three lenses into design thinking, acting, and being. Design Studies, 32(6), 588–607.
Bellucci, A., Díaz, P., Aedo, I., Malizia, A. (2014). Prototyping device ecologies: physical to digital and viceversa. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction (pp. 373–376). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Bergman, M., Lyytinen, K., Mark, G. (2007). Boundary objects in design: an ecological view of design artifacts. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(11), 546.
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.
Buchenau, M., & Suri, J. F. (2000). Experience prototyping. In: Proc. of the 3rd conference on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 424–433). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2003). Design rationale as theory. In: HCI models, theories and frameworks: toward a multidisciplinary science (pp. 431–461). San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
Chi, P. Y. P., & Li, Y. (2015). Weave: scripting cross-device wearable interaction. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3923–3932). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Cooper, A. (1999). The inmates are running the asylum. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Macmillan Publishing Inc. Co.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Díaz, P., Aedo, I., van der Vaart, M. (2015). Engineering the creative co-design of augmented digital experiences with cultural heritage. In: International symposium on end user development (pp. 42–57). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Garde, J. A., & van der Voort, M. C. (2012). Participants’ interpretations of PD workshop results. In: Proceedings of the 12th participatory design conference: exploratory papers, Workshop descriptions, Industry cases (pp. 5–8). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Hanington, B., & Martin, B. (2012). Universal methods of design: 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions. Beverly, MA, USA: Rockport Publishers.
Harboe, G., Doksam, G., Keller, L., Huang, E. M. (2013). Two thousand points of interaction: augmenting paper notes for a distributed user experience. In: Distributed user interfaces: usability and collaboration, Human–computer interaction series (pp. 141–149). London, UK: Springer.
Houben, S., & Marquardt, N. (2015). Watchconnect: a toolkit for prototyping smartwatch-centric cross-device applications. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1247–1256). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology: activity theory and interaction design. Massachussetts, MA USA: MIT Press.
Kleinsmann, M., & Valkenburg, R. (2008). Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects. Design Studies, 29(4), 369–386.
Klemmer, S. R., Newman, M. W., Farrell, R., Bilezikjian, M., Landay, J. A. (2001). The designers’ outpost: a tangible interface for collaborative web site. In: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (UIST ’01) (pp. 1–10). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Krippendorff, K. (2005). The semantic turn: a new foundation for design. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
Liang, R. H. (2012). Designing for unexpected encounters with digital products: case studies of serendipity as felt experience. International Journal of Design, 6(1), 41–58.
Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., Klann, M., Wulf, V. (2006). End-user development: an emerging paradigm. In: H. Lieberman, F. Paternò, V. Wulf (Eds.). End-user development, Human-Computer Interaction Series 9, (1–7). Netherlands: Springer.
Luebbe, A., Edelman, J., Steinert, M., Leifer, L., Weske, M. (2010). Design thinking implemented in software engineering tools. 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium (DTRS8). Sydney: University of Technology.
Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., Eastmond, E. (2010). The scratch programming language and environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 10(4), 16.
Markopoulos, P., Mavrommati, I., Kameas, A. (2004). End-user configuration of ambient intelligence environments: Feasibility from a user perspective. In: EUSAI 2004, European Symposium on Ambient Intelligence. Lecture notes in computer science vol 3295 (pp. 243–254). Springer, Heidelberg.
Nebeling, M., Mintsi, T., Husmann, M., Norrie, M. (2014). Interactive development of cross-device user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2793–2802). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Nielsen, J. (1993). Iterative user-interface design. Computer, 26(11), 32–41.
Obrenovic, Ž., & Martens, J. B. (2011). Sketching interactive systems with sketchify. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 18(1):1–38.
O’Neill, E., Johnson, P., Johnson, H. (1999). Representations and user-developer interaction in cooperative analysis and design. Human-Computer Interaction, 14(1), 43–91.
Osborn, A. F. (1979). Applied imagination: principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Scribner.
Pokress, S.C., & Veiga, J.J.D. (2013). MIT App inventor: enabling personal mobile computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.2830.
Rhea, D. (2003). Bringing clarity to the “Fuzzy Front End”. In: B. Laurel (Ed.). Design research: methods and perspectives (pp. 145–154). Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Planning problems are wicked. Polity, 4, 155–69.
Robertson, B. F., & Radcliffe, D. F. (2009). Impact of CAD tools on creative problem solving in engineering design. Computer-Aided Design, 41(3), 136–146.
Rosenbaum, E., Eastmond, E., Mellis, D. (2010). Empowering programmability for tangibles. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction (pp. 357–360). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Sanders, E. B. N., Brandt, E., Binder, T. (2010). A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design. In Proc. of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (pp. 195–198). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4(1), 5–18.
Sanders, E. B. N., & Westerlund, B. (2011). Experiencing, exploring and experimenting in and with co-design spaces. In Proc. nordic design research conference (pp. 298–302). Helsinki, Finland: Aalto University.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action 5126, New York, NY, USA: Basic Books.
Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Terrenghi, L., Quigley, A., Dix, A. (2009). A taxonomy for and analysis of multi-person-display ecosystems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13(8), 583–598.
Ur, B., McManus, E., Pak Yong Ho, M., Littman, M. L. (2014, April). Practical trigger-action programming in the smart home. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 803–812). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Yang, J., & Wigdor, D. (2014). Panelrama: enabling easy specification of cross-device web applications. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2783–2792). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 493–502). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Acknowledgements
meSch is funded by EC FP7 “ICT for access to cultural resources” (ICT Call 9: FP7-ICT-2011-9) under the Grant Agreement 600851.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Díaz, P., Aedo, I., Bellucci, A. (2017). Integrating End Users in Early Ideation and Prototyping: Lessons from an Experience in Augmenting Physical Objects. In: Paternò, F., Wulf, V. (eds) New Perspectives in End-User Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60291-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60291-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60290-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60291-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)