Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Usability Analysis in Surgical Prosthetics Application for Patient Specific Implants PSI

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Usability and User Experience (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 607))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 4242 Accesses

Abstract

Objective: Analyze and validate usability of three PSI alternatives by measuring criteria such as: efficiency, effectiveness and satisfaction. Throughout analysis an alternative which offers the best solution to the case study was validated. Methods: An experiment was developed with 6 participants skilled in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Experts, using PSI and a prototyped skull corresponding with case study, simulated surgical pre-planning. Two of the PSI were designed by the project and one was commercial type. Results: It is evident that PSI alternatives, which were designed for case study were better valued compared with commercial alternative type one. This commercial-type alternative did not achieve expectations of participants in terms of surgical and usability. In addition, commercial alternative makes placement and fixation process more difficulty in the bone defect than proposed PSI. Conclusions: Usability validation was conducted in this study, allows identifying relevance of PSI design applied to cranioplasty procedures. Its relevance increases the possibility of successful surgery and postoperative procedures. It is necessary to perform future experiments in non-simulated surgical environments, where results might be more accurate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garcia, H., Reyes, D., Diegoperez, J., Mercado, A.: Traumatismo craneal en niños: frecuencia y algunas características epidemiológicas. Rev. Medigraphic 41, 495–501 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Faillot, T.: Traumatismos craneales. EMC Tratado Med. 14(1), 1–6 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Losada, A.L.: Trauma craneoencefálico aspectos epidemiológicos y fisiopatológicos. Rev. Fac. Salud RFS 1(1), 63–76 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Osma, J.L.: Factores asociados a la severidad del trauma ocasionado por lesiones en motocicleta en el área metropolitana de Bucaramanga, pp. 14–18 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gander, T., et al.: Patient specific implants (PSI) in reconstruction of orbital floor and wall fractures. J. Cranio Maxillofac. Surg. 43(1), 126–130 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. López, C.I., Bravo, E., Moreno, J.C., Bautista, L.E.: Approach study to a model of integration technologies for ideation of customized implants. J. Adv. Manag. Sci. 3(4), 323–328 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Afeez, A., Kumar, A.: Application of CAD and reverse engineering methodology for development of complex assemblies. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 11(3), 375–390 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bagaria, V., Deshpande, S., Rasalkar, D.D., Kuthe, A., Paunipagar, B.K.: Use of rapid prototyping and three-dimensional reconstruction modeling in the management of complex fractures. Eur. J. Radiol. 80(3), 814–820 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rotaru, H., et al.: Cranioplasty with custom-made implants: analyzing the cases of 10 patients. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 70(2), e169–e176 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Catapam, R., Okimoto, M., Paredes, M.: The use of reverse engineering development of cranial prosthesis for thermal spray, No. 68, pp. 647–656 (2013). Fed. Univ. Parana

    Google Scholar 

  11. Essig, H., et al.: Precision of posttraumatic primary orbital reconstruction using individually bent titanium mesh with and without navigation: a retrospective study. Head Face Med. 9(1), 18 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maya, J., López, C.R., López, I., Sierra, A.: Metodologıa para la manufactura de implantes craneales a partir de imagenes DICOM y tecnologias CAD/CAM/CNC, pp. 53–66 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grille, P., et al.: Factores pronósticos en el traumatismo craneoencefálico grave del adulto. Rev. Bras. Ter. Intensiva XXXIII(1), 81–87 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pereira, E.A.C., Aziz, T.Z.: Cranioplasty: Plus Ca Change, Plus c’est la MEme Chose. World Neurosurg. 82(3–4), e433–e434 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brie, J., et al.: A new custom made bioceramic implant for the repair of large and complex craniofacial bone defects. J. Cranio Maxillofac. Surg. 41(5), 403–407 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schebesch, K.-M., Höhne, J., Gassner, H.G., Brawanski, A.: Preformed titanium cranioplasty after resection of skull base meningiomas - a technical note. J. Cranio Maxillofac. Surg. 41(8), 803–807 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chrzan, R., Urbanik, A., Karbowski, K., Moskała, M., Polak, J., Pyrich, M.: Cranioplasty prosthesis manufacturing based on reverse engineering technology. Med. Sci. Monit. 18(1), MT1–MT6 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. González de Santiago, M.A., Chaurand Lara, J., Sandoval, B.: Reconstrucción craneal con implante personalizado. Rev. Española Cirugía Oral y Maxilofac. 33(1), 40–44 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sahoo, N.K., Kumar, P., Rappai, T.J.: Growing skull fracture. Indian J. Dent. 4(1), 48–51 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dujovny, M., Aviles, A., Agner, C., Fernandez, P., Charbel, F.T.: Cranioplasty: cosmetic or therapeutic? Surg. Neurol. 47(3), 238–241 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohlhenrich, S.C., Kniha, K., Heussen, N., Holzle, F., Modabber, A.: Effects on primary stability of three different techniques for implant site preparation in synthetic bone models of different densities. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 54(9), 1–7 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lethaus, B., Bloebaum, M., Essers, B., Ter Laak, M.P., Steiner, T., Kessler, P.: Patient-specific implants compared with stored bone grafts for patients with interval cranioplasty. J. Craniofac. Surg. 25(1), 206–209 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Biswas, S., Alarcón, G., Valentín, A.: Effects of metallic cranioplasty on electroencephalographic recordings: an illustrative case. Clin. Neurophysiol. 124(3), 626–627 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lethaus, B., Bloebaum, M., Koper, D., Poort-Ter Laak, M., Kessler, P.: Interval cranioplasty with patient-specific implants and autogenous bone grafts - Success and cost analysis. J. Cranio Maxillofac. Surg. 42(8), 1948–1951 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goh, R.C.W., Chang, C.-N., Lin, C.-L., Lo, L.-J.: Customised fabricated implants after previous failed cranioplasty. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 63(9), 1479–1484 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Casallo, C., Tantas, G., Pineda, R., Reporte de caso: Craneoplastía con implante de polieteretercetona diseñado por computadora. 27(3), 193–195 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Roberto Soler, C.C., de Lima, J.: Implante craneano individual de gran volumen en polimetilmetacrilato de metilo a partir de un prototipo rápido. Reporte de un caso XIII, 26–36 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kemmoku, D.T., Noritomi, P.Y., Roland, F.G., Silva, J.V.L.: Use of BioCAD in the development of a growth compliant prosthetic device for cranioplasty of growing patients, pp. 127–130 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors are most grateful to the VIE of the Industrial University of Santander for their financial support for participation in the event.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Industrial Design, University Industrial of Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia

    María José González, Clara Isabel López & Fernanda Maradei

Authors
  1. María José González
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Clara Isabel López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fernanda Maradei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María José González .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Central Florida , Orlando, Florida, USA

    Tareq Ahram

  2. Catholic University of Pernambuco , Boa Vista, Recife, Brazil

    Christianne Falcão

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

González, M.J., López, C.I., Maradei, F. (2018). Usability Analysis in Surgical Prosthetics Application for Patient Specific Implants PSI. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability and User Experience. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 607. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60492-3_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60492-3_58

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60491-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60492-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation