Skip to main content

Driving Workload Indicators: The Case of Senior Drivers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 604))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2352 Accesses

Abstract

The automotive industry is currently focused in the goal of developing advanced autonomous driving systems (ADAS) and its supporting technologies. A main condition for achieving this goal is to ensure drivers’ safety and comfort during the ride. The driving task is often described as complex and dynamic and can be considered as the single most risky task that the individual has to perform on a daily basis. Since the mean age of the population in industrialized countries is gradually increasing, one of the ADAS objective is to enhance mobility of seniors by easing the task of driving to levels with which they are able to comply. This paper aimed at researching present key workload indicators that can be used by the car autonomous driving systems to establish the more efficient means to keep the senior drivers informed about the driving task and surrounding environment, allowing them to benefit from other entertainment applications and safely resume the driving task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. OECD: Elderly population (indicator) (2017). doi: 10.1787/8d805ea1-en. Accessed 07 Mar 2017

  2. Nakano, T., Yamada, M., Yamamoto, S.: A method for assessing the driving ability of the elderly and thoughts on its systematization. IATSS Res. 32(1), 44–53 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellet, T., Tattegrain-Veste, H., Chapon, A., Bruyas, M.P., Pachiaudi, G., Deleurence, P., Guilhon, V.: Ingénierie cognitive dans le contexte de l’assistance à la conduite automobile. In: Boy, G. (ed.) Ingénierie Cognitive. Lavoisier, Paris (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. NHTSA: Federal Automated Vehicles Policy, Accelerating the Next Revolution in Roadway Safety (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. SAE: Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice – J3016. SAE International, USA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer, G., Deix, S.: Research and innovation for automated driving in Germany and Europe. In: Meyer, G., Beiker, S. (eds.) Road Vehicle Automation, pp. 71–81. Springer, Cham (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Okumura, Y.: Activities, findings and perspectives in the field of road vehicle automation in Japan. In: Meyer, G., Beiker, S. (eds.) Road Vehicle Automation, pp. 37–46. Springer, Cham (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hancock, P.A., Desmond, P.A.: Preface. In: Hancock, P.A., Desmond, P.A. (eds.) Stress, Workload, and Fatigue, pp. 13–15. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eby, D.W., Molnar, L.J., Zhang, L., St Louis, R.M., Zanier, N., Kostyniuk, L.P.: Keeping Older Adults Driving Safely: A Research Synthesis of Advanced In-Vehicle Technologies, A LongROAD Study. Perceptual Motor Skills, 47, 993–994 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Waard, D.: The Measurement of Drivers’ Mental Workload. Groningen University, Traffic Research Center, Netherlands (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thorslund, B., Ahlström, C., Peters, B., Eriksson, O., Lidestam, B., Lyxell, B.: Cognitive workload and visual behavior in elderly drivers with hearing loss. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 6(4), 377–385 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pereira, M.S.O.: In-vehicle information systems – related multiple task performance and driver behavior: Comparison between different age groups. Doctoral thesis, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Lisboa (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Birren, J.E., Fisher, L.M.: Aging and speed of behavior: Possible consequences for psychological functioning. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 46(1), 329–353 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, J.H., Rothrock, L., Laberge, J.: Arousal and performance in a process monitoring task using signal detection theory. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wickens, C.D.: Processing resources in attention. In: Davies, D.R., Parasuraman, R. (eds.) Varieties of Attention. Academic Press, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wickens, C.D., McCarley, J.S.: Applied Attention Theory. CRC Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reimer, B., Donmez, B., Lavallière, M., Mehler, B., Coughlin, J.F.: Impact of age and cognitive demand on lane choice and changing under actual highway conditions. Accid. Anal. Prev. 52, 125–132 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D’Ambrosio, L.A., Donorfio, L.K.M., Coughlin, J.F., Mohyde, M., Meyer, J.: Gender differences in self-regulation patterns and attitudes toward driving among older adults. J. Women Aging 20(3–4), 265–282 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Langford, J., Koppel, S.: Epidemiology of older driver crashes – identifying older driver risk factors and exposure patterns. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 9(5), 309–321 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meng, F., Gray, R., Ho, C., Ahtamad, M., Spence, C.: Dynamic vibrotactile signals for forward collision avoidance warning systems. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Biondi, F., Rossi, R., Gastaldi, M., Mulatti, C.: Beeping ADAS: reflexive effect on drivers’ behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 25, Part A, July 2014, pp. 27–33 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.020

  22. Tivesten, E., Dozza, M.: Driving context and visual-manual phone tasks influence glance behavior in naturalistic driving. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 26, 258–272 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. He, J., Becic, E., Lee, Y.C., McCarley, J.S.: Mind wandering behind the wheel performance and oculomotor correlates. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 53(1), 13–21 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, Y., Reimer, B., Dobres, J., Mehler, B.: The sensitivity of different methodologies for characterizing drivers’ gaze concentration under increased cognitive demand. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 26, 227–237 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Di Nocera, F., Camilli, M., Terenzi, M.: Using the distribution of eye fixations to assess pilots’ mental workload. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 63–65, October 2006

    Google Scholar 

  26. North Atlantic Treaty Organisation: NATO Guidelines on Human Engineering Testing and Evaluation RTO-TR-021 AC/323(HFM-018)TP/19, vol. 323 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Young, M.S., Brookhuis, K. A., Wickens, C.D., Hancock, P.A.: State of science: mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heine, T., Lenis, G., Reichensperger, P., Beran, T., Doessel, O., Deml, B.: Electrocardiographic features for the measurement of drivers’ mental workload. Appl. Ergon. 61, 31–43 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kahneman, D.: Attention and Effort. Prentice-Hall. vol. 1063, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Eggemeier, F.T., Wilson, G.F., Kramer, A.F., Damos, D.L.: Workload assessment in multi-task environments. In: Damos, D.L. (ed.) Multiple Task Performance, pp. 207–216. Taylor & Francis, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kompass, K., Huber, W., Helmer, T.: Safety and comfort systems: Introduction and overview. In: Handbook of Intelligent Vehicles, pp. 605–612. Springer, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  32. O’Donnell, R.D., Eggemeier, F.T.: Workload assessment methodology (1986). doi:10.1007/978-3-658-05005-4

  33. Eskandarian, A.: Fundamentals of driver assistance. In: Handbook of Intelligent Vehicles, pp. 491–535. Springer, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hall, J., Dudek, C.L.: Committee on user characteristics. In: Driver performance data book update: older drivers and IVHS. Transportation research circular 419. National Research Council, Washington, DC (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Deloitte. Global Automotive Consumer Study Exploring Consumers’ Mobility Choices and Transportation Decisions (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bishop, R.: Intelligent vehicle technology and trends (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., The PRISMA Group: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the Prisma statement. PLoS Med. 6(7) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  38. MILLER, S.: Literature review: workload measures. Technical report, N01-006. Iowa City, IA, USA. University of Iowa (2001). http://www.nads-sc.uiowa.edu/publicationStorage/200501251347060.N01-006.pdf

  39. Mehler, B., Reimer, B., Coughlin, J.F.: Sensitivity of physiological measures for detecting systematic variations in cognitive demand from a working memory task: an on-road study across three age groups. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2012). 0018720812442086

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bruni, S., Chang, A., Carlin, A., Swanson, L., Pratt, S.: Designing an adaptive flight deck display for trajectory-basedoperations in NextGen. Adv. Hum. Asp. Aviat. 23, 23–32 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Son, J., Lee, Y., Kim, M.H.: Impact of traffic environment and cognitive workload on older drivers’ behavior in simulated driving. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 12(1), 135–141 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mouloua, M., Al-Awar Smither, J., Vincenzi, D.A., Smith, L.: Automation and aging: issues and considerations. In: Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research, pp. 213–237. Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gelau, C., Sirek, J., Dahmen-Zimmer, K.: Effects of time pressure on left-turn decisions of elderly drivers in a fixed-base driving simulator. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 14(1), 76–86 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cantin, V., Lavallière, M., Simoneau, M., Teasdale, N.: Mental workload when driving in a simulator: effects of age and driving complexity. Accid. Anal. Prev. 41(4), 763–771 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by COMPETE: POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007043 and FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the Project Scope: UID/CEC/00319/2013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nélson Costa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Costa, N., Simões, P., Costa, S., Arezes, P. (2018). Driving Workload Indicators: The Case of Senior Drivers. In: Arezes, P. (eds) Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 604. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60525-8_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60525-8_61

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60524-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60525-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics