Skip to main content

Evaluation of a Virtual Environment Prototype for Studies on the Effectiveness of Technology-Based Safety Signs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Ergonomics in Design (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 588))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3932 Accesses

Abstract

This pilot study aimed to evaluate the viability of using a Virtual Environment (VE) prototype for conducting research regarding technology-based safety signs, i.e., Augmented Reality (AR) warnings. Using a complex work-related context (comprised of two hazardous situations with distinct salience levels) and a sample of 12 workers (27–60 years), the study’s objectives were to assess: the AR safety signs’ effectiveness in enhancing hazard-risk behaviors and promoting behavioral compliance; as well as the participants’ overall user experience. To undergo such an evaluation, the following issues were addressed: simulator sickness; level of presence; hazard and safety sign perception; and overall usability. Results reveal that: the AR warnings were effective in identifying hazards and in prompting compliant behaviors; and despite slight simulator sickness, participants were highly engaged, as well as adequately perceived both hazards and warnings. Thus, the VE prototype proved to be adequate for safety sign research regarding AR warnings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mayhorn, C.B., Wogalter, M.S., Laughery, K.R.: Analysis and design of warnings in the workplace. In: Wilson, J.R., Sharples, S. (eds.) Evaluation of Human Work, pp. 331–358. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rogers, W.A., Lamson, N., Rousseau, G.K.: Warning research: an integrative perspective. Hum. Factors 42, 102–139 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ayres, T.J.: Evaluation of warning effectiveness. In: Karwowski, W. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, vol. II, pp. 1094–1097. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Laughery, K.R., Wogalter, M.S.: A three-stage model summarizes product warning and environmental sign research. Saf. Sci. 61, 3–10 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wogalter, M.S., Laughery, K.R., Mayhorn, C.B.: Warnings and hazard communications. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 868–893. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Laughery, K.R.: Safety Communications: warnings. Appl. Ergon. 37, 467–478 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Adams, A.S.: Warning design. In: Karwowski, W. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, vol. II, pp. 1517–1520. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. McLaughlin, A.C., Mayhorn, C.B.: Designing effective risk communications for older adults. Saf. Sci. 61, 59–65 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayhorn, C.B., Podany, K.I.: Warnings and aging: describing the receiver characteristics of older adults. In: Wogalter, M.S. (ed.) Handbook of Warnings, pp. 355–361. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, P.D.: World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wogalter, M.S., Conzola, V.C.: Using technology to facilitate the design and delivery of warnings. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 33, 461–466 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Duarte, E., Rebelo, F., Teles, J., Wogalter, M.S.: Behavioral compliance for dynamic versus static signs in an immersive virtual environment. Appl. Ergon. 45, 1367–1375 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wogalter, M.S., Mayhorn, C.B.: Providing cognitive support with technology-based warning systems. Ergonomics 48, 522–533 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., MacIntyre, B.: Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 21, 34–47 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Craig, A.B.: Understanding augmented reality: concepts and applications. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bimber, O., Raskar, R.: Spatial augmented reality merging real and virtual worlds. Wellesley, Massachusetts (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Rusch, M.L., Schall, M.C., Gavin, P., Lee, J.D., Dawson, J.D., Vecera, S., Rizzo, M.: Directing driver attention with augmented reality cues. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 16, 127–137 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rusch, M.L., Schall, M.C., Lee, J.D., Dawson, J.D., Rizzo, M.: Augmented reality cues to assist older drivers with gap estimation for left-turns. Accid. Anal. Prev. 71, 210–221 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reis, L., Duarte, E., Rebelo, F.: Research on workplace safety sign compliance: validation of a virtual environment prototype. Procedia Manuf. 3, 6599–6606 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ishihara, S.: Test for Colour-Blindness. Kanehara & Co., Ltd., Tokyo (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., McHugh, P.R.: Mini-Mental state: a practice method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 12, 189–198 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guerreiro, M.M., Silva, A.P., Botelho, M.A., Leitão, A.V., Caldas, C., Caldas, L.A.: Adaptação à População Portuguesa na Tradução do “Mini Mental State Examination” (MMSE). Rev. Port. Neurol. 9, 9–10 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  23. International Organization for Standardization: Graphical Symbols - Safety Colours and Safety Signs (ISO 3864-1,2,3,4)

    Google Scholar 

  24. International Organization for Standardization: Graphical Symbols - Test Methods (ISO 9186-1,2)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Developers, O.: Oculus Best Practices. https://developer3.oculus.com/documentation/intro-vr/latest/concepts/book-bp/

  26. Jankowski, J., Samp, K., Irzynska, I., Jozwowicz, M., Decker, S.: Integrating text with video and 3d graphics: the effects of text drawing styles on text readability. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1321–1330 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. International Organization for Standardization: Graphical Symbols - Safety Signs - Safety Way Guidance Systems (SWGS) (ISO 16069:2004) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A Ph.D. scholarship (SFRH/BD/79622/2011) granted to Lara Reis de Amaral, from FCT: Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation), supported this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lara Reis de Amaral .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Amaral, L.R., Duarte, E., Rebelo, F. (2018). Evaluation of a Virtual Environment Prototype for Studies on the Effectiveness of Technology-Based Safety Signs. In: Rebelo, F., Soares, M. (eds) Advances in Ergonomics in Design. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 588. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60582-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60582-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60581-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60582-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics