Skip to main content

Do Zenware Applications Reduce the Digital Distraction of Knowledge Workers? A Qualitative Study Based on Expert Interviews

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Ergonomics in Design (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 588))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Applications helping us to maintain the focus on work are called “Zenware” (from concentration and Zen). While form factors, use cases and functionality vary, all these applications have a common goal: creating uninterrupted, focused attention on the task at hand. The rise of such tools exemplifies the users’ desire to control their attention within the context of omnipresent distraction. In expert interviews we investigate approaches in the context of attention-management at the workplace of knowledge workers. To gain a broad understanding, we use judgement sampling in interviews with experts from several disciplines. We especially explore how focus and flow can be stimulated. Our contribution has four components: a brief overview on the state of the art (1), a presentation of the results (2), strategies for coping with digital distractions and design guidelines for future Zenware (3) and an outlook on the overall potential in digital work environments (4).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zytko, D., Lingel, J., Birnholtz, J., Ellison, N.B., Hancock, J.: Online dating as pandora’s box: methodological issues for the CSCW community. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moore, G.E.: Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38(8), 114–117 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson, C.A.: The Information Diet. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Slate. http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2008/01/thetaoofscreen.html

  5. Macmillan Dictionary. http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/zenware

  6. Oxford Living Dictionaries. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/lifehack

  7. Soojung-Kim Pang, A.: The Distraction Addiction: Getting the Information You Need and the Communication You Want, Without Enraging Your Family, Annoying Your Colleagues, and Destroying Your Soul (iBooks Version). Little Brown and Company, New York City (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Interruptions in Human-Computer Interaction. https://interruptions.net/literature.htm

  9. Cellier, J.-M., Eyrolle, H.: Interference Between Switched Tasks. Ergonomics 35, 25–36 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cutrell, E.B., Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E.: Effects of instant messaging interruptions on computing tasks. In: CHI 2000 Proceedings, pp. 99–100 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Csíkszentmihályi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Collins, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dragunov, A.N., Dietterich, T.G., Johnsrude, K., McLaughlin, M., Li, L., Herlocker, J.L.: TaskTracer: a desktop environment to support multi-tasking knowledge workers. In: IUI 2005 Proceedings, pp. 75–82 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Finstad, K., Bink, M., McDaniel, M., Einstein, G.O.: Breaks and task switches in prospective memory. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 20(5), 705–712 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McFarlane, D.: Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruptions of people in human-computer interaction. Hum. Comput. Interact. 17(1), 1–61 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Miyata, Y., Norman, D.: Psychological issues in support of multiple activities. In: Norman, D.A., Stephen, W.D. (eds.) User Centered Systems Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 265–284. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Agarwal, R., Karahanna, E.: Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Q. 24(4), 665–694 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Webster, J., Ho, H.: Audience engagement in multi-media presentations. Data Base Adv. Inf. Syst. 28(2), 63–77 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dane, E.: Paying attention to mindfulness and its effect on task performance in the workplace. J. Manag. 37(4), 997–1018 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K.: Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Org. Sci. 17, 514–524 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/20/education/edlife/students-at-stanford-work-on-apps-that-alleviate-stress.html

  21. Mani, M., Kavanagh, D.J., Hides, L., Stoyanov, S.R.: Review and evaluation of mindfulness-based iPhone apps. JMIR mHealth uHealth 3, e82 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/22/fashion/step-away-from-the-phone.html

  23. Berekoven, L., Eckert, W., Ellenrieder, P.: Marktforschung: Methodische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung, 7th edn. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Gilchrist, V.J.: Key informant interviews. In: Bryman, A., Burgess, R.G. (eds.) Qualitative Research, vol. 1. SAGE Publications, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum, New York (1985)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Kowal, J., Fortier, M.S.: Motivational determinants of flow: contributions from self-determination theory. J. Soc. Psychol. 139(3), 355–368 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mark, G., Iqbal, S.T., Czerwinski, M., Johns, P.: Bored mondays and focused afternoons: the rhythm of attention and online activity in the workplace. In: CHI 2014 Proceedings, pp. 3025–3034 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. König, C.J., Kleinmann, M., Höhmann, W.: A field test of the quiet hour as a time management technique. Eur. Rev. Appl. Psychol. 63, 137–145 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bitkomm Markt und Statistik. https://www.bitkom.org/de/marktstatistik/6405475865.aspx

  30. Bitkomm Markt und Statistik. https://www.bitkom.org/de/marktstatistik/6402671631.aspx

  31. Rams, D.: Weniger, Aber Besser: Less But Better. Design + Design, Hamburg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R.: Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damian Gerbaulet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gerbaulet, D., Korn, O. (2018). Do Zenware Applications Reduce the Digital Distraction of Knowledge Workers? A Qualitative Study Based on Expert Interviews. In: Rebelo, F., Soares, M. (eds) Advances in Ergonomics in Design. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 588. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60582-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60582-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60581-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60582-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics