Skip to main content

Applications and Interface Requirements to Engage the Citizens to Share Information in a Smart City Project

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Ergonomics in Design (AHFE 2017)

Abstract

Today the cities are faced with new challenges provoked by the displacement of population to the urban areas. Cities have started to find for information and communication technologies solutions that enable high-quality and more efficient urban services. In this context, this study aims to propose a strategy to create the interfaces for a project related with smart cities. Considering that an interface acceptance by the users is important for its success, we develop a survey based in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM and adapted TAM2) and Motivational Model (MM), to understand their preferences to use different types of interfaces. The sample consisted of 225 Portuguese (107 male and 118 female, min = 18; max = 65 years old. The main results show the age is an important factor concerning their interface preferences and motivations to share information. These results demonstrate the need to develop different applications, one for younger adults that integrate all services and several applications for older adults, grouping one or more services, with different interfaces and rewards mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. UN, United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects. The 2007 Revision Population Database (2008). http://esa.un.org/unup/

  2. Berardi, U.: Sustainability assessments of urban communities through rating systems. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 15(6), 1573–1591 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: Understanding the Internet of Things: definition, potentials, and societal role of a fast evolving paradigm. Ad Hoc Netw. 56, 122–140 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T., Scholl, H.: Understanding smart cities: an integrative framework. In: Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), Grand Wailea, Maui, Hawaii (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coe, A., Paquet, G., Roy, J.: E-governance and smart communities: a social learning challenge. J. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 19(1), 80–93 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sheppard, B.H., Hartwick, J., Warshaw, P.R.: The theory of reasoned action: a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. J. Consum. Res. 15(3), 325–343 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vallerand, R.J., et al.: Ajzen and Fishbein’s theory of reasoned action as applied to moral behavior: a confirmatory analysis. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 62(1), 98 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Legris, P., Ingham, J., Collerette, P.: Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 40(3), 191–204 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Szajna, B.: Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Manag. Sci. 42(1), 85–92 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Przybylski, A.K., Rigby, C.S., Ryan, R.M.: A motivational model of video game engagement. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 14(2), 154 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cox, W.M., Klinger, E.: A motivational model of alcohol use. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 97(2), 168–180 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Conner, M., Armitage, C.J.: Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for further research. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28(15), 1429–1464 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wonglimpiyarat, J., Yuberk, N.: In support of innovation management and Roger’s Innovation Diffusion theory. Gov. Inf. Q. 22(3), 411–422 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Luszczynska, A., Schwarzer, R.: Social cognitive theory. Predict. Health Behav. 2, 127–169 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bandura, A.: Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychol. 3(3), 265–299 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A., Howell, J.M.: Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Q. 125–143 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 425–478 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Rebelo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rebelo, F., Noriega, P., Oliveira, T., Santos, D., Carvalhais, J., Cotrim, T. (2018). Applications and Interface Requirements to Engage the Citizens to Share Information in a Smart City Project. In: Rebelo, F., Soares, M. (eds) Advances in Ergonomics in Design. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 588. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60582-1_71

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60582-1_71

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60581-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60582-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics