Skip to main content

Comparison of Two Post Office Workstation Layouts by Means of an Optoelectronic Motion Analysis System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Social & Occupational Ergonomics (AHFE 2017)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze the post office user/customer interface, comparing two workstation layouts. The post office clerk was facing the client in one layout and seated at 45° with respect to the counter in the other. We analyzed the most frequent tasks presenting awkward postures: (1) payment of a postal order; (2) accepting a registered letter. These two tasks were further divided in their subtasks. We used an optoelectronic motion analysis system, and measured the Range of Motion (RoM) of trunk, arms and head. Using equipments placed on the employee left side the 45° workstation layout required less trunk and head torsion. A larger worktop improved the workstation, leaving more room for the equipments and allowing the worker to sit in front of screen and keyboard. However, this solution involved increased RoMs in the activities performed on both sides. The opto-electronic motion analysis system gave quantitative data still at the prototype stage. On the contrary, the most common standardized protocols, based on subjective observations, can give only qualitative evaluations. Furthermore, with the opto-electronic system, differently from simulation software that uses virtual settings, we are able to check the real interaction between the worker and the layout. From the quantitative data we can also extract useful information to help occupational doctors in managing healthcare protocols and to draw up a fuller, real assessment of biomechanical risks. Designers and planners could also use the data to study work layouts focusing at the same time to both on worker and on the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. NIOSH: Public Health Service. NIOSH Publications on Video Display Terminals (Revised). NIOSH, Cincinnati, OH (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. OSHA, Department of Labor, Working Safely with Video Display Terminals (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. SUVA: Il lavoro al videoterminale informazioni dettagliate per specialisti e non (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. INAIL: Il Lavoro al videoterminale. A cura di Barbara Manfredi. Stampato dalla Tipolitografia INAIL di Milano (2010). ISBN 978-88-7484-169-1

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sengupta, A.K., Das, B.: Determination of worker physiological cost in workspace reach envelopes. Ergonomics 47, 330–342 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roth J.T., Ayoub M.M., Halcomb C.G.: Seating console and workplace design: seated operator reach profiles. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 21st Annual Meeting, pp. 83–87 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haslegrave, C.M.: Characterizing the anthropometric extremes of the population. Ergonomics 29, 281–301 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Das, B., Behara, D.N.: Determination of the normal horizontal working area: a new model and method. Ergonomics 38, 734–748 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sengupta, A.K., Das, B.: Maximum reach envelope for the seated and standing male and female for industrial workstation design. Ergonomics 43, 1390–1404 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Holman, G.T., Davis, J., Maghsoodloo, S.: The effects of dynamic movement on seated reach arcs. Ergonomics 51, 691–701 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrigno, G., Pedotti, A.: ELITE: a digital dedicated hardware system for movement analysis via real-time TV signal processing. IEEE T. Bio-Med. Eng. 32, 943–950 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rab, G., Petuskey, K., Bagley, A.: A method for determination of upper extremity kinematics. Gait Posture 15, 113–119 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cook, C., Burgess-Limerick, R., Papalia, S.: The effect of upper extremity support on upper extremity posture and muscle activity during keyboard use. Appl. Ergon. 35(3), 285–292 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessio Silvetti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Silvetti, A. et al. (2018). Comparison of Two Post Office Workstation Layouts by Means of an Optoelectronic Motion Analysis System. In: Goossens, R. (eds) Advances in Social & Occupational Ergonomics. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 605. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60828-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60828-0_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60827-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60828-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics