Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) is the imaging modality used to calculate the deposit of dose in radiotherapy planning, where the physical interactions are modelled based upon the electron density, which can be calculated from CT images. Traditionally this is a three step process: linearising the raw x-ray measurements and correcting for beam-hardening and scatter; inverting the system with analytic or iterative reconstruction algorithms into linear attenuation coefficient; then applying a non-linear calibration into electron density. In this work, we propose a new method for statistically inferring a quantitative image of electron density directly from the raw CT measurements, with no pre- or post-processing necessary, and able to cope with both beam-hardening from a single polyenergetic source and additive scatter. We evaluate this concept with cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging for bladder cancer, where we demonstrate significantly higher electron density accuracy than other quantitative approaches. We also show through simulated photon and proton beam calculation, that our method may facilitate superior dose estimation, especially with regions containing bony structures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schneider, U., Pedroni, E., Lomax, A.: The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys. Med. Biol. 41(1), 111–124 (1996)
Curry, T.S., Dowdey, J.E., Murry, R.C.: Christensen’s Physics of Diagnostic Radiology (1990)
Joseph, P.M., Spital, R.D.: A method for correcting bone induced artifacts in computed tomography scanners (1978)
Fessler, J.A.: Fundamentals of CT reconstruction in 2D and 3D. Compr. Biomed. Phys. 2(2.11), 263–295 (2014). Elsevier
Elbakri, I.A., Fessler, J.A.: Statistical image reconstruction for polyenergetic X-ray computed tomography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21(2), 89–99 (2002)
Elbakri, I.A., Fessler, J.A.: Segmentation-free statistical image reconstruction for polyenergetic X-ray computed tomography with experimental validation. Phys. Med. Biol. 48(15), 2453–2477 (2003)
De Man, B., Nuyts, J., Dupont, P., Marchal, G., Suetens, P.: An iterative maximum-likelihood polychromatic algorithm for CT. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20(10), 999–1008 (2001)
Bouman, C., Sauer, K.: A generalized Gaussian image model for edge-preserving MAP estimation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2(3), 296–310 (1993)
Rudin, L.I., Osher, S., Fatemi, E.: Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 60(1–4), 259–268 (1992)
Daubechies, I., Fornasier, M., Loris, I.: Accelerated projected gradient method for linear inverse problems with sparsity constraints. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 14(5–6), 764–792 (2008)
Siewerdsen, J.H., Jaffray, D.A.: Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of X-ray scatter. Med. Phys. 28(2), 220 (2001)
Tuy, H.K.: An inversion formula for cone-beam reconstruction. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 43(3), 546–552 (1983)
Chang, Z., Zhang, R., Thibault, J.-B., Sauer, K., Bouman, C.: Statistical X-ray computed tomography imaging from photon-starved measurements. SPIE Comput. Imaging 9020, 90200G (2014)
ICRP Publication 89. Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection reference values. Ann. ICRP 32, 3–4 (2002)
Chouzenoux, E., Pesquet, J.C., Repetti, A.: Variable metric forward-backward algorithm for minimizing the sum of a differentiable function and a convex function. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 162(1), 107–132 (2014)
Erdogan, H., Fessler, J.A.: Monotonic algorithms for transmission tomography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18(9), 801–814 (1999)
ICRP Publication 110. Adult Reference Computational Phantoms. Ann. ICRP 39(2) (2009)
Jan, S., Benoit, D., Becheva, E., Carlier, T., Cassol, F., Descourt, P., Frisson, T., Grevillot, L., Guigues, L., Maigne, L., Morel, C., Perrot, Y., Rehfeld, N., Sarrut, D., Schaart, D.R., Stute, S., Pietrzyk, U., Visvikis, D., Zahra, N., Buvat, I.: GATE V6: a major enhancement of the GATE simulation platform enabling modelling of CT and radiotherapy. Phys. Med. Biol. 56(4), 881–901 (2011)
Xu, Y., Bai, T., Yan, H., Ouyang, L., Pompos, A., Wang, J., Zhou, L., Jiang, S.B., Jia, X.: A practical cone-beam CT scatter correction method with optimized Monte Carlo simulations for image-guided radiation therapy. Phys. Med. Biol. 60(9), 3567–3587 (2015)
Fessler, J.A.: Image Reconstruction Toobox. https://web.eecs.umich.edu/~fessler/code/. Accessed 14 Nov 2014
Barrett, A., Morris, S., Dobbs, J., Roques, T.: Practical Radiotherapy Planning. 4th edn (2009)
Feldkamp, L.A., Davis, L.C., Kress, J.W.: Practical cone-beam algorithm. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1(6), 612 (1984)
Wang, G.: X-ray micro-CT with a displaced detector array. Med. Phys. 29(7), 1634 (2002)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Maxwell Advanced Technology Fund, EPSRC DTP studentship funds and ERC project: C-SENSE (ERC-ADG-2015-694888) for supporting this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mason, J.H., Perelli, A., Nailon, W.H., Davies, M.E. (2017). Quantitative Electron Density CT Imaging for Radiotherapy Planning. In: Valdés Hernández, M., González-Castro, V. (eds) Medical Image Understanding and Analysis. MIUA 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 723. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60964-5_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60964-5_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60963-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60964-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)