Abstract
In this paper, we verify three different 6 degrees of freedom Kuka Agilus robots for application in neurosurgery. Application specific reachability maps are generated for robots with 707 mm (R700), 901 mm (R900), and 1101 mm (R1100) horizontal reach. The reachability of each robot reflects a working volume of a standard stereotactic frame which utilizes the center of arc principle. A working volume with 100% reachability yield has been identified for the R900 and R1100 robots when the robot is positioned sideways to the patient. The R700 robot doesn’t have a 100% reachability yield work volume. Robot configurations within the reachability map are further optimized given two dexterity performance indices: the condition number and a new fuzzy joint limit avoidance function. In the experiments, we have further evaluated the impact on robot work volume given robot orientation with respect to the patient. After reorienting the robot a significant increase in work volume with 100% reachability yield was obtained for all three robots.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S (1988) A robot with improved absolute po-sitioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Bio-med Eng 35(2):153–160
Haidegger T, Benyó Z (2008) Industrial robotic solutions for interventional medicine. In: Proceedings of the international GTE conference manufacturing, pp 125–130
Maciunas RJ, Galloway RL, Latimer JW (1994) The application accuracy of stereotactic frames. Neurosurgery 35(4):682–695
Nubiola A, Bonev IA (2013) Absolute calibration of an ABB IRB 1600 robot using a laser tracker. Robot Comput Integr Manufact. 29(1):236–245
Haidegger T, Rudas IJ (2014) From concept to market: surgical robot development. In: Handbook of research on advancements in robotics and mechatronics, vol 242
von Tiesenhausen C (2016) KUKA LBR Med Overview, Augsburg, Germany
González-Martínez J et al (2016) Technique, results, and complications related to robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography. Neurosurgery 78(2):169–180
Faria C, Erlhagen W, Rito M, De Momi E, Ferrigno G, Bicho E (2015) Review of robotic technology for stereotactic neurosurgery. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 8:125–137
Deacon G, Harwood A, Holdback J, Maiwand D, Pearce M, Reid I et al (2010) The Pathfinder image-guided surgical robot. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 224(5):691–713
Burkart A, Debski RE, McMahon PJ, Rudy T, Fu FH, Musahl V et al (2001) Precision of ACL tunnel placement using traditional and robotic techniques. Comput Aided Surg 6(5):270–278
Jerbić B, Nikolić G, Chudy D, Švaco M, Šekoranja B (2015) Robotic application in neurosurgery using intelligent visual and haptic interaction. Int J Simul Model 14(1):71–84
Liu Y, Tian Z, Hui R et al (2016) Clinical application of Remebot stereotactic surgery system without frame. Chin J Sur 54(5):389–390
Spine Health Institute: Dr. Patel performs groundbreaking robotic surgery in Switzerland. http://www.thespinehealthinstitute.com/news-room/health-blog-news/dr-patel-performs-groundbreaking-robotic-surgery-in-switzerland. Accessed 6 Mar 2016
Lefranc M, Peltier J (2016) Evaluation of the ROSATM Spine robot for minimally invasive surgical procedures. Expert Rev Med Devices 13(10):899–906
Minchev G, Kronreif G, Martínez-Moreno M, Dorfer C, Micko A, Mert A et al (2016) A novel miniature robotic guidance device for stereotactic neurosurgical interventions: preliminary experience with the iSYS1 robot. J Neurosurg 1–12
Briot S, Baradat C, Guégan S, Arakelian V (2007) Contribution to the Mechanical Behavior Improvement of the Robotic Navigation Device Surgiscope, pp 653–661
Cardinale F, Cossu M, Castana L, Casaceli G, Schiariti MP, Miserocchi A et al (2013) Stereoelectroencephalography: surgical methodology, safety, and stereotactic application accuracy in 500 procedures. Neurosurgery 72(3):353–366
Shoham M et al (2007) Robotic assisted spinal surgery–from concept to clinical practice. Comput Aided Surg 12(2):105–115
Heinig M, Hofmann UG, Schlaefer A (2012) Calibration of the motor-assisted robotic stereotaxy system: MARS. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 7(6):911–920
Gasparetto A, Zanotto V (2010) Toward an optimal performance index for neurosurgical robot’s design. Robotica 28(2):279
Vidakovic J, Jerbić B, Šuligoj F, Švaco M, Šekoranja B (2016) Simulation for robotic stereotactic neurosurgery. In: 27th DAAAM
Diankov R, Kuffner J (2008) Openrave: a planning architecture for autonomous robotics. Robotics Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, Technical report CMU-RI-TR-08-34, vol 79
Zacharias F, Borst C, Beetz M, Hirzinger G (2008) Positioning mobile manipulators to perform constrained linear trajectories. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IROS 2008, pp 2578–2584
Khan WA, Angeles J (2006) The kinetostatic optimization of robotic manipulators: the inverse and the direct problems. J Mech Des 128(1):168
Pamanes-Gareia J (1990) A criterion for the optimal placement of robotic manipulators. In: Information control problems in manufacturing technology 1989, 6th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IMACS symposium, Madrid, Spain, p 149
Švaco M, Jerbić B, Šuligoj F (2014) Autonomous robot learning model based on visual interpretation of spatial structures. Trans FAMENA 38(4):13–28
Acknowledgements
Authors would like to acknowledge the Croatian Scientific Foundation through the research project ACRON - A new concept of Applied Cognitive RObotics in clinical Neuroscience. Authors would like to thank the entire team from the hospital Dubrava (KB Dubrava), especially prof. dr. sc. Darko Chudy and Domagoj Dlaka for their help in the clinical procedures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Švaco, M., Koren, P., Jerbić, B., Vidaković, J., Šekoranja, B., Šuligoj, F. (2018). Validation of Three KUKA Agilus Robots for Application in Neurosurgery. In: Ferraresi, C., Quaglia, G. (eds) Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics. RAAD 2017. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 49. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61276-8_107
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61276-8_107
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61275-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61276-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)