Skip to main content

Design Issues for an Inherently Safe Robotic Rehabilitation Device

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics (RAAD 2017)

Part of the book series: Mechanisms and Machine Science ((Mechan. Machine Science,volume 49))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper outlines the main design issues for an upper limb rehabilitation device. In particular, human motions have been measured and analyzed in order to identify a safe workspace required for a rehabilitation device. A preliminary design solution is proposed based on a cable-driven parallel architecture, which can provide the required operation workspace and significantly improve the safety of the rehabilitation procedure as compared with exoskeletons or traditional robotic devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stein J (2012) Robotics in rehabilitation: technology as destiny. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 91(11):S199–S203 (Supplement 3)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Boninger ML (2011) Technologies and combination therapies for enhancing movement training for people with a disability. J Neuroeng Rehab

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carrera HA et al (2011) ROAD: domestic assistant and rehabilitation robot. Med Biol Eng Comput 49(10):1201–1211. doi:10.1007/s11517-011-0805-4 Epub 2011 Jul 26. Review. PubMed PMID: 21789672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Basteris A, Nijenhuis SM, Stienen AH, Buurke JH, Prange GB, Amirabdollahian F (2014) Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review. J NeuroEng Rehabil 11, 111. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-111

  5. Iosa GM et al (2012) Seven capital devices for the future of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke Res Treat 2012, Article ID 187965, 9 pages. doi:10.1155/2012/187965

  6. Sheng B et al (2016) Model based kinematic & dynamic simulation of 6-DOF upper-limb rehabilitation robot. In: Asia-Pacific Conference on 2016 Intelligent Robot Systems (ACIRS), pp 21–25

    Google Scholar 

  7. Medical devices (2015) Recognized essential principles of safety and performance of medical devices, BS ISO 16142-2

    Google Scholar 

  8. ISO Standards (2016) Robots and robotic devices. Collaborative robots, PD ISO/TS 15066:2016

    Google Scholar 

  9. Major KA, Major ZZ, Carbone G, Pîslă A, Vaida C, Gherman B, Pîslă D (2016) Ranges of motion as basis for robot-assisted post-stroke rehabilitation. J Bioflux Soc Hum Vet Med 8(4):192–196

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carbone G, Cavero CA, Ceccarelli M, Altuzarra O (2017) A study of feasibility for a limb exercising device. In: Advances in italian mechanism science, series mechanisms and machine science, vol 47, pp 11–21

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ceccarelli M (2010) Romdhane L design issues for human-machine platform interface in cable-based parallel manipulators for physiotherapy applications. J Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 11(4):231–239. doi:10.1631/jzus.A1000027

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Carbone G, Ceccarelli M Sistema a cavi per assistenza motoria. (Cable driven system for motion assistance), patent application n.102016000038975, 15/04/2016

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The paper presents results from the research activities of the project ID 37_215, MySMIS code 103415 “Innovative approaches regarding the rehabilitation and assistive robotics for healthy ageing” co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund through the Competitiveness Operational Programme 2014–2020, Priority Axis 1, Action 1.1.4, through the financing contract 20/01.09.2016, between the Technical University of Cluj-Napoca and ANCSI as Intermediary Organism in the name and for the Ministry of European Funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Carbone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Carbone, G., Gherman, B., Ulinici, I., Vaida, C., Pisla, D. (2018). Design Issues for an Inherently Safe Robotic Rehabilitation Device. In: Ferraresi, C., Quaglia, G. (eds) Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics. RAAD 2017. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 49. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61276-8_110

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61276-8_110

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61275-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61276-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics