Skip to main content

Using Spring-Damper Elements to Support Human-Like Push Recovery Motions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics (RAAD 2017)

Part of the book series: Mechanisms and Machine Science ((Mechan. Machine Science,volume 49))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper studies push recovery of humans while walking which is an important research topic in biomechanics and robotics bringing systems to their limits. The main goal of the presented research is to determine which passive elements can best support given push recovery motions. The research is based on a multi-body system model of human walking in the sagittal plane, which has active torques in all joints and parameterized spring damper torques in parallel in the lower limb joints. In addition, we use recorded data of human push recovery and the solution of least squares optimal control problems. The results show that a significant reduction of the active torques required for the motion can be achieved including the spring-damper elements. This approach can be applied to component design of humanoid robots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. MMM - Master Motor Map. http://mmm.humanoids.kit.edu/index.html. Accessed 29 Feb 2016

  2. Vicon Motion Capture. http://www.vicon.com/. Accessed 28 July 2016

  3. Bock HG, Plitt KJ (1984) A multiple shooting algorithm for direct solution of optimal control problems. Pergamon Press, pp 243–247

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clever D, Mombaur K (2016) An inverse optimal control approach for the transfer of human walking motions in constrained environment to humanoid robots. In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan, June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards WT (2007) Effect of joint stiffness on standing stability. Gait Posture 25:432–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Felis ML (2015) Modeling emotional aspects in human locomotion. Ph.D. thesis, Heidelberg University

    Google Scholar 

  7. Felis ML (2016) Rbdl: an efficient rigid-body dynamics library using recursive algorithms. Auton Robots :1–17

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fitzpatrick RC, Taylor JL, McCloskey DI (1992) Ankle stiffness of standing humans in response to imperceptible perturbation: reflex and task-dependent components. J Physiol 454:533–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsiao ET, Robinovitch SN (1999) Biomechanical influences on balance recovery by stepping. J Biomech 32:1099–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hwang B, Jeon D (2015) A method to accurately estimate the muscular torques of human wearing exoskeletons by torque sensors. Sensors 15:8337–8357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koschorreck J, Mombaur K (2009) Optimization of somersaults and twists in platform diving. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 12(2–1):157–159

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Leineweber DB, Bauer I, Bock HG, Schlöder JP (2003) An efficient multiple shooting based reduced SQP strategy for large-scale dynamic process optimization - Part I: theoretical aspects, pp 157–166

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mombaur KD, Longman RW, Schlöder JP, Bock HG (2006) Optimizing spring-damper design in human-like walking that is asymptotically stable without feedback. In: Proceedings of international conference on high performance scientific computing 2006. Lecture Notes in Scientific Computing, Hanoi, Vietnam. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pratt J, Carff J, Drakunov S, Goswami A (2006) Capture point: a step toward humanoid push recovery. In: 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp 200–207

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rebula J, Canas F, Pratt J, Goswami A (2007) Learning capture points for humanoid push recovery. In: 7th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, pp 65–72

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schemschat RM, Clever D, Felis ML, Chiovetto E, Giese M, Mombaur K (2016) Joint torque analysis of push recovery motions during human walking. In: International conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (BioRob 2016), pp 133–139

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schultz G, Mombaur K (2010) Modeling and optimal control of human-like running. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 15(5):783–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stephens B (2007) Humanoid push recovery. In: 7th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, pp 589–595

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tu K-Y, Lee W-C (2010) Analysis and study of human joint torque and motion energy during walking on various grounds. Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp 73–81

    Google Scholar 

  20. Winter DA, Patla AE, Prince F, Ishac M, Gielo-Perczak K (1998) Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. J Neurophysiol 80:1211–1221

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wit A, Czaplicki A (2008) Inverse dynamics and artificial neural network applications in gait analysis of the disabled subjects. Hum Mov 9:93–102

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wu M, Ji L, Jin D, Pai Y (2007) Minimal step length necessary for recovery of forward balance loss with a single step. J Biomech 40:1559–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007 - 2013) under grant agreement no 611909 (KoroiBot) and from the HGS MathComp Heidelberg Graduate School. We want to thank the Simulation and Optimization research group of the IWR at Heidelberg University for giving us the possibility to work with MUSCOD-II. We also want to thank T. Asfour and co-workers, KIT, Karlsruhe for providing the MMM framework. Furthermore we want to thank M. Giese and E. Chiovetto from CIN in Tübingen for providing the motion capture lab and help to record and process the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja Mombaur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kopitzsch Schemschat, R.M., Mombaur, K. (2018). Using Spring-Damper Elements to Support Human-Like Push Recovery Motions. In: Ferraresi, C., Quaglia, G. (eds) Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics. RAAD 2017. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 49. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61276-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61276-8_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61275-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61276-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics