Skip to main content

Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robotic System Requirements Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics (RAAD 2017)

Part of the book series: Mechanisms and Machine Science ((Mechan. Machine Science,volume 49))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper presents the need for upper limb rehabilitation and gives one possible solution with rehabilitation robotics. The research objectives, medical and technical requirements analysis for an upper limb rehabilitation robotic system are presented. Designing a usable upper limb rehabilitation robotic system must address the needs of its users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fanin C, Gallina P, Rossi A, Zanatta U, Masiero S (2003) Nerebot: a wire-based robot for neurorehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 8th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR 2003, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosati G, Gallina P, Masiero S, Rossi A (2005) Design of a new 5 d.o.f. wire-based robot for rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Chicago, USA, pp 430–433

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nef T, Mihelj M, Colombo G, Riener R (2006) ARMin – robot for rehabilitation of the upper extremities. In: IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, pp 3152–3157

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balasubramanian S, Wei R, Perez M, Shepard B, Koeneman E, Koeneman J, He J (2008) RUPERT: An exoskeleton robot for assisting rehabilitation of arm functions. In: Virtual Rehabilitation Conference Proceedings, pp 163–167

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haumont T, Rahman T, Sample W, King M, Church C, Henley J, Jayakumar S (2011) Wilmington robotic exoskeleton: a novel device to maintain arm improvement in muscular disease. J Pediatr Orthop 31(5):e44-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Takahashi CD, Der-Yeghiaian L, Le V, Motiwala RR, Cramer SC (2008) Robot based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain 131(2):425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rocon E., Ruiz AF, Ponce JL (2005) Rehabilitation robotics: a wearable exo-skeleton for tremor assessment and suppression. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, pp 2271–2276

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosen J, Perry JC, Manning N, Burns S, Hannaford B (2005) The human arm kinematics and dynamics during daily activities – toward a 7 DOF upper limb powered exoskeleton. In: IEEE Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, pp 532–539

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tsagarakis NG, Caldwell DG (2003) Development and control of a physiotherapy and training exercise facility for the upper limb using soft actuators. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Portugal, pp 1080–1085

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gopura R, Kiguchi K (2009) SUEFUL-7: a 7DOF upper-limb exoskeleton robot with muscle-model-oriented EMG-based control. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2009), St. Louis, USA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Garrido J, Yu W, Soria A (2014) Modular design and modeling of an upper limb exoskeleton. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), São Paulo, Brazil, pp 508–513

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carignan C, Liszka M, RoderickS (2005) Design of an arm exoskeleton with scapula motion for shoulder rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Robotics, ICAR 2005, pp 524–531

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tsagarakis NG, Caldwell D (2003) Development and control of a “soft-actuated” exoskeleton for use in physiotherapy and training. Auton Robots 15:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta A, O’Malley M (2006) Design of a haptic arm exoskeleton for training and rehabilitation. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 11(3):280–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mao Y, Jin X, Dutta GG, Scholz JP, Agrawal SK (2015) Human movement training with a Cable Driven ARm EXoskeleton (CAREX). IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 23(1):84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Copilusi C, Ceccarelli M (2015) An application of LARM clutched arm for assisting disabled people. Int J Mech Control 16(1):57–66

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holtzblatt K, Wendell JB, Wood S (2004) Rapid Contextual Design: A How-to Guide to Key Techniques for User-Centered Design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schuler D, Namioka A (1993) Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  19. Davidson I, Waters K (2000) Physiotherapists working with stroke patients: a national survey. Physiotherapy 86(2):69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lennon S (2003) Physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation: a survey. Disab Rehabil 25(9):455–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stanger CA, Anglin C, Harwin WS, Romilly DP (1994) Devices for assisting manipulation: a summary of user task priorities. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2(4):256–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Natarajan P, Oelschlager A, Agah A, Phol PS, Ahmad SO, Liu W (2008) Current clinical practices in stroke rehabilitation: Regional pilot survey. J Rehabil Res Dev 45(6):841–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee M, Rittenhouse M, Abdullah HA (2005) Design issues for therapeutic robot systems: results from a survey of physiotherapists. J Intell Rob Syst 42(3):239–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lindsay M, Gubitz G, Bayley M, Hill M, Davies-Schinkel C, Phillips S (2010) Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  25. National Stroke Foundation (2005) Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery. NSF, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by PN-III 109BG/2016 grant of the Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding (UEFISCDI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorin Popescu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Popescu, D., Manta, F., Rusu, L., Avramescu, T.E., Zavaleanu, M. (2018). Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robotic System Requirements Analysis. In: Ferraresi, C., Quaglia, G. (eds) Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics. RAAD 2017. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 49. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61276-8_98

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61276-8_98

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61275-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61276-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics