Abstract
Virtual learning companions have shown significant potential for supporting students. However, there appear to be gender differences in their effectiveness. In order to support all students well, it is important to develop a deeper understanding of the role that student gender plays during interactions with learning companions. This paper reports on a study to explore the impact of student gender and learning companion design. In a three-condition study, we examine middle school students’ interactions in a game-based learning environment that featured one of the following: (1) a learning companion deeply integrated into the narrative of the game; (2) a learning companion whose backstory and personality were not integrated into the narrative but who provided equivalent task support; and (3) no learning companion. The results show that girls were significantly more engaged than boys, particularly with the narrative-integrated agent, while boys reported higher mental demand with that agent. Even when controlling for video game experience and prior knowledge, the gender effects held. These findings contribute to the growing understanding that learning companions must adapt to students’ gender in order to facilitate the most effective learning interactions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Schroeder, N.L., Adesope, O.O., Gilbert, R.B.: How effective are pedagogical agents for learning? a meta-analytic review. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 49(1), 1–39 (2013)
Kim, Y., Baylor, A.L.: A social cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as learning companions. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 54(6), 569–596 (2006)
Kim, Y., Baylor, A.L.: PALS group: pedagogical agents as learning companions: the role of agent competency and type of interaction. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 54(3), 223–243 (2006)
Kim, Y., Baylor, A.L.: Research-based design of pedagogical agent roles: a review, progress, and recommendations. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. (IJAIED) 26(1), 160–169 (2016)
Rowe, J.P., Shores, L.R., Mott, B.W., Lester, J.C.: Integrating learning, problem solving, and engagement in narrative-centered learning environments. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. (IJAIED) 21(1–2), 115–133 (2011)
Arroyo, I., Woolf, B.P., Cooper, D.G., Burleson, W., Muldner, K.: The impact of animated pedagogical agents on girls’ and boys’ emotions, attitudes, behaviors and learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technology, Athens, GA, pp. 506–510 (2011)
Buffum, P.S., Boyer, K.E., Wiebe, E.N., Mott, B.W., Lester, J.C.: Mind the gap: improving gender equity in game-based learning environments with learning companions. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), pp. 64–73 (2015)
Ryokai, K., Vaucelle, C., Cassell, J.: Virtual peers as partners in storytelling and literacy learning. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 19, 195–208 (2003)
Cassell, J., Geraghty, K., Gonzalez, B., Borland, J.: Modeling culturally authentic style shifting with virtual peers. In: Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces - ICMI-MLMI 2009, pp. 135–142 (2009)
Plant, E.A., Baylor, A.L., Doerr, C.E., Rosenberg-Kima, R.B.: Changing middle-school students’ attitudes and performance regarding engineering with computer-based social models. Comput. Educ. 53(2), 209–215 (2009)
Woolf, B.P., Arroyo, I., Muldner, K., Burleson, W.: The effect of motivational learning companions on low achieving students and students with disabilities. In: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 327–337 (2010)
Grawemeyer, B., Mavrikis, M., Holmes, W., Gutierrez-Santos, S.: Adapting feedback types according to students affective states. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), pp. 586–590 (2015)
Grawemeyer, B., Mavrikis, M., Holmes, W., Hansen, A., Loibl, K., Gutiérrez-Santos, S.: Affect matters: exploring the impact of feedback during mathematical tasks in an exploratory environment. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), pp. 595–599 (2015)
Baker, R.S.J.D., D’Mello, S.K., Rodrigo, M.M.T., Graesser, A.C.: Better to be frustrated than bored: the incidence and persistence of affect during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 68(4), 223–241 (2010)
Dweck, C.S.: Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Essays in social psychology. Psychology Press, New York (1999)
Azevedo, R., Cromley, J.G.: Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? J. Educ. Psychol. 96(3), 523–535 (2004)
Sabourin, J., Shores, L., Bradford, W., Lester, J.C.: Understanding and predicting student self-regulated learning strategies in game-based learning environments. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. (IJAIED) 23(1–4), 94–114 (2013)
O’Brien, H.L., Toms, E.G.: The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement in e-commerce environments. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 61(1), 50–69 (2010)
Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183 (1988)
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the thoughtful input of the members of the LearnDialogue group. This work is supported by the National Science Foundation through grant CHS-1409639. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pezzullo, L.G. et al. (2017). “Thanks Alisha, Keep in Touch”: Gender Effects and Engagement with Virtual Learning Companions. In: André, E., Baker, R., Hu, X., Rodrigo, M., du Boulay, B. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10331. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61424-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61425-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)