Skip to main content

Demand Side Management: A Case for Disruptive Behaviour

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Computational Methods for Knowledge Engineering (ICCSAMA 2017)

Abstract

The UK electricity system is undergoing a significant transformation. Increasing penetration of renewable generation and integration of new consumer technologies (e.g. electric vehicles) challenge the traditional way of balancing electricity in the grid, whereby supply matches demand. Demand-side management (DSM) has been shown to offer a promising solution to the above problem. However, models proposed in literature typically consider an isolated system whereby a single aggregator coordinates homogeneous consumers. As a result potential externalities of DSM are overlooked. This work explores the value of DSM in the context of an interacting electricity system, where utilities compete for cheap electricity in the wholesale market. A stylized model of the UK electricity system is proposed, whereby a traditional supplier competes with a ‘green’ supplier in the wholesale market. The modelling was able to show that with enough dispatchable capacity the traditional supplier was able to benefit from instructing his consumers to increase demand peaks, which had an adverse effect on the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This type of a suppliers represents one of the ‘Big Six’ energy utilities operating in the UK market.

  2. 2.

    These companies represent the new entrants in the UK electricity market like Ecotricity and Good Energy.

  3. 3.

    This serves as a step for further development of the model where the consumers are able to switch suppliers.

  4. 4.

    We use standard residential demand profiles provided by the National Grid [5].

  5. 5.

    In order to model the generation capacity of the GS we take historical electricity supply profile from a 1.8 MW wind farm in Wales [9, 10].

  6. 6.

    Since the GS does not sell electricity in the market it omits the second term from (2).

  7. 7.

    The model code is also available on request.

References

  1. Bomann, T., Eser, E.J.: Model-based assessment of demand-response measures. A comprehensive literature review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 57, 1637–1656 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bower, J., Bunn, D.W.: Model-based comparisons of pool and bilateral markets for electricity. Energy J. 21(3), 1–29 (2000). https://www.jstor.org/stable/41322889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DECC. Smart meters: a guide. London (2016). https://www.gov.uk/guidance/smart-meters-how-they-work

  4. DfT Vehicle Licensing Statistics. Electric vehicle market statistics (2016). http://www.nextgreencar.com/electric-cars/statistics/

  5. Demand profiling-ELEXON (2013). https://www.elexon.co.uk/reference/technical-operations/profiling/

  6. Elexon. Market Index Data - BMRS (2015). https://www.bmreports.com/bmrs/?q=balancing/marketindex/historic

  7. Gan, L., Topcu, U., Low, S.H.: Optimal decentralized protocol for electric vehicle charging. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28(2), 940–951 (2013). http://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2210288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gan, L., Wierman, A., Topcu, U., Chen, N., Low, S.H.: Real-time deferrable load control: handling the uncertainties of renewable generation. In: Fourth International Conference on Future Energy Systems (E-Energy 2013), pp. 113–124 (2013). http://doi.org/10.1145/2567529.2567553

  9. Pfenninger, S., Staffell, I.: Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data. Energy 114, 1251–1265 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.060. https://www.renewables.ninja

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Staffell, I., Pfenninger, S.: Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output. Energy 114, 1224–1239 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.068. https://www.renewables.ninja

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Electricity supply market shares by company: Domestic (GB). Ofgem (2016). https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/chart/electricity-supply-market-shares-company-domestic-gb

  12. Renewable UK. UK Wind Energy Database (UKWED) (2016). http://www.renewableuk.com/en/renewable-energy/wind-energy/uk-wind-energy-database/index.com

  13. Renewable Energy Foundation (REF). Energy Data (2016). http://www.ref.org.uk/energy-data

  14. Schweppe, F., Daryanian, B., Tabors, R.D.: Algorithms for a spot price responding residential load controller. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 4(2), 507–516 (1989). http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/ResidentialLoadControllerAlgorithms.FSchweppeEtAl1989.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Strbac, G., Aunedi, M., Pudjianto, D., Djapic, P., Gammons, S., Druce, R.: Understanding the Balancing Challenge (2012). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/48553/5767-understanding-the-balancing-challenge.pdf

  16. Tesla. Powerwall - The Tesla Home Battery (2017). https://www.tesla.com/en_GB/powerwall

  17. Voice, T., Vytelingum, P., Ramchurn, S., Rogers, A., Jennings, N.: Decentralised control of micro-storage in the smart grid. In: AAAI 2011: Twenty-Fifth Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1421–1426 (2011). http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/272262/

  18. Yang, Z., Li, K., Foley, A., Zhang, C.: Optimal scheduling methods to integrate plug-in electric vehicles with the power system: a review. In: IFAC World Congress, pp. 8594–8603 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Part of the research was developed in the Young Scientists Summer Program at the International Institute for Systems Analysis, Laxenburg (Austria) with financial support from the United Kingdoms National Member Organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dina Subkhankulova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

A Model Flow Diagram

A Model Flow Diagram

figure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Subkhankulova, D., Baklanov, A., McCollum, D. (2018). Demand Side Management: A Case for Disruptive Behaviour. In: Le, NT., van Do, T., Nguyen, N., Thi, H. (eds) Advanced Computational Methods for Knowledge Engineering. ICCSAMA 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 629. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61911-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61911-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61910-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61911-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics