Abstract
When an earthquake of a certain magnitude hit a populated zone, a huge amount of data have to be collected in order to address the typical hazard and emergency actions for rescue, assistance, viability, etc. In this paper we concentrate our attention on a particular dataset used to estimate the amount (and location) of rubbles generated by partial or total collapse of buildings/structures, which strongly influences the consequent environmental hazard and reconstruction phase. Despite this information is particularly valuable for optimizing the emergence response, for example by improving the management of their prompt removal, there are not many methods to estimate the amount of the rubbles in terms of volume/weight. Here, a procedure to estimate the volume of rubble heaps through earth observation data and Geomatics techniques is presented and preliminary results discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
http://www.pcn.minambiente.it/geoportal/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7BB8A39D4E-D7DF-4621-9318-4EEE3B1511CF%7D (Source: Italian National Geoportal).
- 2.
- 3.
Zonal Statistics To Polygon Attributes: this ERDAS Imagine (by Hexagon Geospatial) operator extracts the zonal statistics of the background image of a vector feature layer and save them as vector attributes.
References
United States Environmental Protection Agency: Household Hazardous Waste Management: A Manual for One-Day Community Collection Programs. EPA530-R-92-026, Washington, D.C., August 1993
Lund, H.F.: Household Hazardous Wastes. The McGraw-Hill Recycling Handbook (1993)
Memon, M.A.: Disaster waste recovery and utilization in developing countries-Learning from earthquakes in Nepal. In: 15th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, ARC 2015: New Innovations and Sustainability, pp. 143–147 (2015)
Talbot, B.G., Talbot, L.M.: Fast-responder: Mobile access to remote sensing for disaster response. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 79(10), 945–954 (2013)
Amatrice, Norcia, Visso Seismic Sequence, INGV. http://terremoti.ingv.it/it/ultimi-eventi/1023-sequenza-sismica-in-italia-centrale-aggiornamenti.html. Last access: 28 Mar 2017. (In Italian)
Pizzi, A., Galadini, F.: Pre-existing cross-structures and active fault segmentation in the northern-central Apennines (Italy). Tectonophysics 476, 304–319 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2009.03.018
Coltorti, M., Farabollini, P.: Quaternary evolution of the Castelluccio di Norcia Basin (Umbria-Marchean Apennines, Italy). Il Quaternario 8, 149–166 (1995)
King, G.C.P.: Speculations on the geometry of the initiation and termination processes of earthquake rupture and its relation to morphology and geological structure. Pure Appl. Geophys. 124(3), 567–585 (1986)
Hernandez, B., Cocco, M., Cotton, F., Stramondo, S., Scotti, O., Courboulex, F., Campillo, M.: Rupture history of the 1997 Umbria-Marche (Central Italy) main shocks from the inversion of GPS, DInSAR and near field strong motion data. Ann. Geophys. 47, 1355–1376 (2004)
Valensise, G., Pantosti, D.: The investigation of potential earthquake sources in peninsular Italy: a review. J. Seismol., 5287–5306 (2001)
Calamita, F., Pizzi, A.: Tettonica quaternaria nella dorsal appenniniica umbro-marchigiana e bacini intrappenninici associate. Studi Geologici Camerti, SI, 17–25 (1992)
Cacciuni, A., Centamore, E., Di Stefano, R., Dramis, F.: Evoluzione morfotettonica della conca di Amatrice. Studi Geologici Camerti 2, 95–100 (1995)
Copernicus Emergency Management Service (EMS). http://emergency.copernicus.eu/
Pollino, M., Modica, G.: Free web mapping tools to characterize landscape dynamics and to favor e-participation computational science and its applications. In: Murgante, B., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2013, LNCS 7973, Part III, 566–581. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Modica, G., Pollino, M., Lanucara, S., Porta, L., Pellicone, G., Fazio, S., Fichera, C.R.: Land suitability evaluation for agro-forestry: definition of a web-based multi-criteria spatial decision support system (MC-SDSS): preliminary results. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9788, pp. 399–413. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42111-7_31
Steiniger, S., Hunter, A.J.S.: Free and open source GIS software for building a spatial data infrastructure. In: Bocher, E., Neteler, M. (eds.) Geospatial Free and Open Source Software in the 21st Century, pp. 247–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Modica, G., Laudari, L., Barreca, F., Fichera, C.R.: A GIS-MCDA based model for the suitability evaluation of traditional grape varieties: the case-study of ‘mantonico’ grape (Calabria, Italy). IJAEIS 5(3), 1–16 (2014)
PostgreSQL with PostGIS extension. http://postgis.net
Geoserver. http://geoserver.org/
GeoPlatform by geoSDI. https://github.com/geosdi/geo-platform
Pollino, M., Caiaffa, E., Carillo, A., Porta, L., Sannino, G.: Wave energy potential in the mediterranean sea: design and development of DSS-WebGIS “waves energy”. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Gavrilova, Marina L., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Torre, C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9157, pp. 495–510. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21470-2_36
CNR-ITC, C.N.VV.FF.: Sisma Abruzzo 6 Aprile 2009 - Stima quantificazione macerie, Activity Report (2010). (In Italian)
Marghella, G., Marzo, A., Moretti, L., Indirli, M.: Uso del GIS per il Piano di Ricostruzione di Arsita (TE). In: ANIDIS 2013 – XV Convegno (2013). (In Italian)
Modica, G., Zoccali, P., Fazio, S.: The e-participation in tranquillity areas identification as a key factor for sustainable landscape planning. In: Murgante, B., Misra, S., Carlini, M., Torre, C.M., Nguyen, H.-Q., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Gervasi, O. (eds.) ICCSA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7973, pp. 550–565. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39646-5_40
Fichera, C.R., Modica, G., Pollino, M.: Land Cover classification and change-detection analysis using multi-temporal remote sensed imagery and landscape metrics. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 45, 1–18 (2012)
European Flood Awareness System (EFAS). https://www.efas.eu/
European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS). http://effis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
Acknowledgments
The present research has been funded by ENEA and requested by DPC. EO data were provided under COPERNICUS by European Union and ESA. Thanks to Eng. F. Campopiano, P. Marsan and P. Pagliara of National Civil Protection for the fruitful discussion and suggestions and to all staff involved during the emergency action. ENEA is not responsible for any use, even partial, of the contents of this document by third parties and any damage caused to third parties resulting from its use. The data contained in this document is the property of ENEA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cappucci, S. et al. (2017). Earthquake’s Rubble Heaps Volume Evaluation: Expeditious Approach Through Earth Observation and Geomatics Techniques. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017. ICCSA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10405. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62395-5_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62395-5_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62394-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62395-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)