Skip to main content

The Knowledge Communication Conceptual Model in Malaysian Public Sector

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Management in Organizations (KMO 2017)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 731))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1902 Accesses

Abstract

Planning for Information and Communication Technology (ICT) future in the context of Malaysian public service is in the hand of group of IT experts and decision makers. Both parties are responsible for making decisions and plan the future ICT direction of the organization. Therefore it is important to comprise common understanding between Information Technology (IT) experts and decision makers so it will lead to a better and comprehensive decision making. However, there are still lacks of studies to describe the parties’ potential to undertake the situation from the perspective of the knowledge integration of among IT experts and decision makers especially in term of communication. Therefore, it is an essential to develop further understanding on the knowledge communication idea. It is done by integrating the concept of both knowledge sharing and knowledge transfer. From the literature analysis, the study found knowledge sharing framework and knowledge transfer framework might influence to the knowledge communication model. Therefore further study is recommended to validate the knowledge communication conceptual model in the real organization setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Reinhardt, R., Stattkus, B.: Fostering knowledge communication: concept and implementation. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 8(5), 536–545 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. M. D. Economic planning unit. Eleventh Malaysia Plan (2016–2020) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meng, C.C., Samah, B.A., Omar, S.Z.: A review paper: critical factors affecting the development of ICT projects in Malaysia. Asian Soc. Sci. 9(4), 42–50 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Patanakul, P.: Managing large-scale IS/IT projects in the public sector: problems and causes leading to poor performance. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 25, 21–35 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Watson, C.M.: Don’t blame the engineers. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 4 (2004). Winter 2004

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knipfer, K., Mayr, E., Zahn, C., Schwan, S., Hesse, F.W.: Computer support for knowledge communication in science exhibitions: novel perspectives from research on collaborative learning. Educ. Res. Rev. 4(3), 196–209 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Korban, S.: Project manager and business analyst in tandem for success. BA Times (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eppler, M.J.: Knowledge communication problems between experts and decision makers: an overview and classification. Electron. J. Knowl. Manag. 5(3), 291–300 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mengis, J., Eppler, M.J.: Integrating knowledge through communication: an analysis of expert-decision maker interactions. Universtu of Lugano (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lamont, M.: Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 38(21), 201–221 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eppler, M.J.: 10 years of knowledge-communication.org results, insights, perspectives (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ya’acob, S., Mohamad Ali, N., Mat Nayan, N.: Understanding big picture and its challenges: experts and decision makers perspectives. In: Zaman, H.B., Robinson, P., Olivier, P., Shih, T.K., Velastin, S. (eds.) IVIC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8237, pp. 311–322. Springer, Cham (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02958-0_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Mengis, J.: Integrating knowledge through communication - the case of experts and decision makers. In: OLKC 2007, vol. 44, no. 0, pp. 699–720 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benslimane, D., Dustbar, S., Sheth, A.: Services mashups: the new generations of web applications. IEEE Internet Comput. 12, 13–15 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ipe, M.: Knowledge sharing in organizations: a conceptual framework. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2(4), 337–359 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Noe, R.A., Wang, S.: Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 20(2), 115–131 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, W., Cheng, H.: Management factors affecting the knowledge sharing attitude of hotel service personnel. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 31, 468–476 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aslani, F., Mousakhani, M., Aslani, A.: Knowledge sharing: a survey, assessment and directions for future research: individual behavior perspective. Int. J. Soc. Behav. Educ. Econ. Bus. Ind. Eng. 6(8), 2025–2029 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schauer, A., Vasconcelos, A.C., Sen, B.: The ShaRInk framework: a holistic perspective on key categories of influences shaping individual perceptions of knowledge sharing. J. Knowl. Manag. 4(19), 770–790 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Den Hooff, B., De Ridder, J.A.: Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carlile, P.R.: Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5), 555–568 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goh, S.C.: Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implications. J. Knowl. Manag. 6(1), 23 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bhagat, S.R., Ben Kedia, L., Harveston, D.P., Triandis, C.H.: Cultural variations in the cross-border transfer of organizational knowledge: an integrative framework. Acad. Manag. Rev. 27(2), 204–221 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liyanage, C., Elhag, T., Ballal, T., Li, Q.: Knowledge communication and translation – a knowledge transfer model. J. Knowl. Manag. 13(3), 1–23 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nonaka, I.: A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1), 14–37 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Waveren, C.C., Oerlemans, L.A.G., Pretorius, M.W.: Knowledge transfer in project-based organizations. A conceptual model for investigating knowledge type, transfer mechanisms and transfer success. In: IEEE, pp. 1176–1181 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The research is financially supported by Public Service Department of Malaysia and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia under Research University Grant (RUG), Vot No: 14H16.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rohaizan Daud .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Daud, R., Ab Rahim, N.Z., Ibrahim, R., Ya’acob, S. (2017). The Knowledge Communication Conceptual Model in Malaysian Public Sector. In: Uden, L., Lu, W., Ting, IH. (eds) Knowledge Management in Organizations. KMO 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 731. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62698-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62698-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62697-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62698-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics