Skip to main content

Online Project Management and PHP7 Application: A Real Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Economy. Emerging Technologies and Business Innovation (ICDEc 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 290))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In dynamic and competitive environments, firms have several challenges to resolve in order to improve performance. However, it’s difficult to manage multiple projects with multiple local or remote teammates. For this reasons, projects manager should use a tool that helps them to manage, discuss, communicate, monitor and work with team members in order to increase significantly the effectiveness of the project. Our research presents a vision of project management combining managerial and computing points of view. We present the different empirical solutions managing projects. Finally, we proposed a solution to enterprises via an online project manager developed on PHP7 focusing on three main axes: Planning, Organisation, and Control. The use of free tools minimizes the costs of integration and deployment of the proposed software. This solution allows the company to find the right balance between a good organization of the project, cost and delays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Achterkamp, M.C., Vos, J.F.J.: Investigating the use of the stakeholder notion in project management literature, a meta-analysis. Int. J. Project Manage. 26, 749–757 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adner, R., Helfat, C.E.: Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strateg. Manag. J. 24(10), 1011–1025 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alajoutsijarvi, K., Mainela, T., Salminen, R., Ulkuniemi, P.: Perceived customer involvement and organizational design in project business. Scand. J. Manag. 28, 77–89 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Altonen, K., Jaakko, K., Tuomas, O.: Stakeholder salience in global projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 26, 509–516 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Artto, K., Valtakosk, A., Kärki, H.: Organizing for solutions: how project-based firms integrate project and service businesses. Ind. Mark. Manag. 45, 70–83 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. David, A.: Research-intervention, general framework for management research? In: David, A., Hatchuel, A., Laufer, R. (eds.) The New Foundations of Management Science, pp. 193–214. Vuibert, Paris (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Guimaraes, J.C.F., Severo, E.A., Vieira, P.S.: Cleaner production, project management and strategic drivers: an empirical study. J. Clean. Prod. 141, 881–890 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Design Goals of the Java Programming language. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/intro-141325.html. Accessed 28 Feb 2017

  9. Eric McConnell: Project Records Management In Three Essential Steps (2011). http://www.mymanagementguide.com/project-records-management-in-three-essential-steps/. Accessed 02 Mar 2017

  10. Ethiraj, S.E., Kale, P., Krishnan, M.S., Singh, J.V.: Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? Strateg. Manag. J. 26(1), 25–45 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pertusa-Ortega, E.M., Zaragoza-SĂ¡ez, P., Claver-CortĂ©s, E.: Can formalization, complexity, and centralization influence knowledge performance? J. Bus. Res. 63(3), 310–320 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Freeman, E., Harrison, J., Wicks, A., Parmar, B., Colle, S.: Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garel, G., Giard, V., Midler, C.: Faire de la Recherche en Management de Projet. Vuibert, Paris (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pitkin, G.M., Ed.D.: Using Include Files to Streamline Web Site Management (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gosling, J., Joy, B., Steele, G., Bracha, G., Buckley, A.: The Java® Language Specification (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hakim Guermazi, H., Mbarek, I.: Quality management integrated system and reporting: Tunisian case study. Qual. Access Success 17(152/June), 53–60 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hakim Guermazi, H., Fourati, M.A.: Intelligent dashboard and risk management: Tunisian case study. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Strategy 4(Special issue 1), 6 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hatchuel, A.: Quel horizon pour les sciences de gestion? Vers une théorie de l’action collective. In: David, A., Hatchuel, A., Laufer, R. (eds.) Les nouvelles fondations des sciences de gestion, pp. 7–44. Vuibert, Paris (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ingason, H.Th., Shepherd, S.M.M.: Mapping the future for project management as a discipline - for more focused research efforts. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 119, 288–294 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ireland, L.R.: Project Management, p. 110. McGraw-Hill Professional, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kirca, A., Jayachandran, S., Bearden, W.: Market orientation: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. J. Mark. 69, 24–41 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Koskinen, K., Pihlanto, P.: Knowledge Management in Project-based Companies: An Organic Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Latour, B.: La Science en Action. Gallimard, Paris (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Le Moigne J.-L.: Epistémologies constructivistes et sciences de l’organisation. In: Martinet, A.-C. (ed.) Epistémologies et Sciences de Gestion, Paris Economica, pp. 81–140 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lewis, J.P.: Project Planning, Scheduling & Control, 4E. McGraw Hill, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lundin, R.A., Wirdenius, H.: Interactive research. Scand. J. Manag. 6(2), 125–152 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McMillan, R.: I Is java losing Its Mojo? (2013). https://www.wired.com/2013/01/java-no-longer-a-favorite/. Accessed 28 Feb 2017

  28. Morris, P., Jeffrey, S., Pinto, J.: Towards the third wave of project management. In: The Oxford Handbook of Project Management. Oxford Handbooks Online (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Neverauskas, B., Railaite, R.: Formation approach for project management maturity measurement. Econ. Manag. 18(2), 360–365 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Niazi, M., Sajjad, M., Alshayeb, M., Rehan Riaz, M., Faisal, K., Cerpa, N., Ullah Khan, S., Richardson, I.: Challenges of project management in global software development: a client-vendor analysis. Inf. Softw. Technol. 80, 1–19 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yigitbasioglu, O.M., Velcu, O.: A review of dashboards in performance management: implications for design and research. Int. J. Acc. Inf. Syst. 13, 41–59 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Olivier HEURTEL: PHP 7 - DĂ©veloppez un site web dynamique et interactif (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. ORACLE: Java One 2013 Review: Java Takes on the Internet of Things. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/java/afterglow2013-2030343.html. Accessed 28 Feb 2017

  34. Pettigrew, A.: Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organ. Sci. 1(3), 267–292 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Phillips, J.: PMP Project Management Professional Study Guide, p. 354. McGraw-Hill Professional, Emeryville (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pinto, J., Rouhiainen, P.: Building Customer-based Project Organizations (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Project Management Institute: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge 4th edn., pp. 27–35 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Project Management Institute: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Project management software. https://project-management-software.financesonline.com/#history-of. Accessed 18 Dec 2016

  40. Ramu, G.: Quality in outsourcing – essentials for today’s global marketplace. Qual. Progress J. 22, 37–43 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  41. RedMonk Index: The RedMonk Programming Language Rankings, January 2015. Accessed 28 Feb 2017

    Google Scholar 

  42. Reich, B.H., Gemino, A., Sauer, C.: How knowledge management impacts performance in projects: an empirical study. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 32, 590–602 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Release Candidate 6 de PHP 7.1. http://php.net/index.php#id2016-10-13-1. Accessed 20 Dec 2016

  44. Sallis, E.: Total Quality Management in Education. Taylor and Francis e-Library, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sanchez, M.A.: Integrating sustainability issues into project management. J. Cleaner Prod. 96, 319–330 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. The complete list of developments on the PHP project website. http://php.net/index.php#id2016-07-07-1. Accessed 18 Dec 2016

  47. Thiétart, R.A.: Méthodes de recherche en management. Dunod, Paris (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  48. TIOBE Programming Community Index. http://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/. Accessed 28 Feb 2017

  49. Todorovic, M., Bjelica, D., Mitrovic, Z.: Concepts and models for presentation of project success. Serbian Project Management Journal Belgrade: Serbian Project Management Association- YUPMA, pp. 47–48 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Todorovic, M., Petrovic, D., Mihic, M., Obradovic, V., Bushuyev, S.: Project success analysis framework: a knowledge-based approach in project management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33, 772–783 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Voss, M.: Impact of customer integration on project portfolio management and its success - Developing a conceptual framework. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 30, 567–581 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Durfee, W.: Project Planning and Gantt Charts (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Write once run anywhere. http://www.computerweekly.com/feature/Write-once-run-anywhere. Accessed 28 Feb 2017

  54. Xiaojin, W., Huang, J.: The relationships between key stakeholders project performance and project success: perceptions of Chinese construction supervising engineers. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 24, 253–260 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Houda Hakim Guermazi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hakim Guermazi, H., Zorai, A. (2017). Online Project Management and PHP7 Application: A Real Case Study. In: Jallouli, R., ZaĂ¯ane, O., Bach Tobji, M., Srarfi Tabbane, R., Nijholt, A. (eds) Digital Economy. Emerging Technologies and Business Innovation. ICDEc 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 290. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62737-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62737-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62736-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62737-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics