Skip to main content

Similarity Comparison of 3D Protein Structure Based on Riemannian Manifold

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Computing Theories and Application (ICIC 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10362))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2124 Accesses

Abstract

As the representative technology of protein spatial structure exploration, NMR technology provides an unprecedented opportunity for modern life science research. But subsequent large data analysis has become a major problem. It is an important means to study protein structure and functional relationship by known information proteins’ three-dimensional structures to predict the unknown spatial structure of proteins. A method for similarity comparison of 3D protein structures based on Riemannian manifold theory is proposed in this paper. By constructing Cα frames and extracting geometric feature of protein, 3D coordinates of proteins are converted into one dimension sequences with rotation and translation invariance. The Riemann distance is used as the three-dimensional structure similarity degree index. Spatial transformation on protein structure is not needed in this method, which avoiding errors when matching two proteins in the traditional method for registration by the least squares fitting. This method is independent of sequence information completely. It has realistic significance for proteins which do not have a similarity between sequences. Three experiments are designed according to 3 sets of data: proteins of different similarity, ten pairs whose protein structures are more difficult to identify proposed by Fischer, 700 proteins in the HOMSTRAD database. Compared with the traditional method, the experiment results show that the matching accuracy of this method has been greatly enhanced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Liang, Y.: Structural Biology. Science Press, Ann Arbor (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peng, Q.S., Hu, M.: Approaches for 3D protein structure similarity comparison-a survey. J. Comput. Aided Des. Comput. Graph. 18(10), 1465–1471 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holm, L., Sander, C.: Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 233(1), 123–138 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shindyalov, I.N., Bourne, P.E.: Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension(CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng. 11(9), 739–747 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibrat, J.F., Madej, T., Bryant, S.H.: Surprising similarities in structure comparison. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6(3), 377–385 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Levitt, M.: STRUCTAL. A structural alignment program (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krissinel, E., Henrick, K.: Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60(12), 2256–2268 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, Y., Skolnick, J.: TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res. 33(7), 2302–2309 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Louie, A.H., Somorjai, R.L.: Differential geometry of proteins: a structural and dynamical representation of patterns. J. Theor. Biol. 98(2), 189–209 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Joshi, S.H, Klassen, E., Srivastava, A., et al.: A novel representation for Riemannian analysis of elastic curves in Rn. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 1–7 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klassen, E., Srivastava, A., Mio, W., et al.: Analysis of planar shapes using geodesic paths on shape spaces. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 26(3), 372–383 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, W., Srivastava, A., Zhang, J.: A mathematical framework for protein structure comparison. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7(2), e1001075 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Berman, H.M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., et al.: The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28(1), 235–242 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hanson, A.J., Thakur, S.: Quaternion maps of global protein structure. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 38, 256–278 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ji, Y.Q., Xu, Z.C.: Differential Manifold and Riemannian Geometry. Shaanxi Normal University Press, Xi’an (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Collard, A., Bonnabel, S., Phillips, C., et al.: An anisotropy preserving metric for DTI processing. arXiv:1210.2826 (2012)

  17. Fischer, D., Elofsson, A., Rice, D.W., et al.: Assessing the performance of inverted protein folding methods by means of an extensive benchmark. In: Proceeding of the First Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp. 300–318 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Murzin, A.G., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T., et al.: SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247(4), 536–540 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maiorov, V.N., Crippen, G.M.: Significance of root-mean-square deviation in comparing three-dimensional structures of globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 235(2), 625–634 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, Y., Skolnick, J.: Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Protein Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 57(4), 702–710 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shindyalov, I.N., Bourne, P.E.: Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension(CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng. 11(9), 739–747 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, Y., Zhan, J., Zhao, H., et al.: A new size-independent score for pairwise protein structure alignment and its application to structure classification and nucleic-acid binding prediction. Protein Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 80(8), 2080–2088 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Elofsson, A., Fischer, D., Rice, D.W., et al.: A study of combined structure/sequence profiles. Fold Des. 1(6), 451–461 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the members of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, School of Computer Science and Technology, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, for their helpful discussion within seminars. This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61502356).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhou Fengli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fengli, Z., Xiaoli, L. (2017). Similarity Comparison of 3D Protein Structure Based on Riemannian Manifold. In: Huang, DS., Jo, KH., Figueroa-García, J. (eds) Intelligent Computing Theories and Application. ICIC 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10362. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63312-1_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63312-1_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63311-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63312-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics