Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 626))

Abstract

Aspect-Oriented Ontology Development takes inspiration from Aspect-Oriented Programming and provides a novel approach to the problems of ontology modularization and metamodeling by adding support for reified axioms. The book chapter describes the syntax and semantics of Aspect-Oriented Ontology Development, explains its benefits and possible weaknesses as compared to other existing modularization approaches and presents a set of application scenarios as well as a set of supporting tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As defined by the IEEE standard 1471 of software architecture [2], “concerns are those interests which pertain to the systems development, its operation or any other aspects that are critical or otherwise important to one or more stakeholders”.

  2. 2.

    https://eclipse.org/aspectj/.

  3. 3.

    http://www.fao.org/countryprofiles/geoinfo/en/.

  4. 4.

    www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/.

  5. 5.

    http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/.

  6. 6.

    http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/.

  7. 7.

    http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#rConstructQuery.

  8. 8.

    https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-direct-semantics/.

  9. 9.

    The bottom concept may be constructed by negation of the top concept, so we omit the dedicated bottom concept constructor in order to avoid redundancy. Likewise, we do not introduce the equvialent concept axiom, because it may be defined inductively from general concept inclusions and conjunction.

  10. 10.

    http://owlapi.sourceforge.net/.

  11. 11.

    https://eclipse.org/aspectj/.

  12. 12.

    http://jena.apache.org/.

  13. 13.

    http://owlapi.sourceforge.net/.

  14. 14.

    At the time of the writing of this report, the target language of the OWL API was OWL 2.

  15. 15.

    https://eclipse.org/aspectj/.

  16. 16.

    http://www.corporate-semantic-web.de/ontomaven.html.

  17. 17.

    http://oppl2.sourceforge.net.

  18. 18.

    http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Submissions:View_Inheritance.

  19. 19.

    http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Submissions:Context_Slices.

  20. 20.

    source code available at https://github.com/RalphBln/onto-module-metrics.

References

  1. Schäfermeier, R., Paschke, A.: Aspect-oriented ontologies: dynamic modularization using ontological metamodeling. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 2014), pp. 199 – 212. IOS Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Group, I.A.W.: IEEE standard 1471–2000. Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems, IEEE (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S.: An Overview of Modularity. In: Stuckenschmidt, H., Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S.(eds.) Modular Ontologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5445, pp. 5–23. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Filman, R., Friedman, D.: Aspect-Oriented Programming Is Quantification and Obliviousness. Workshop on Advanced Separation of Concerns, OOPSLA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Steimann, F.: Domain Models Are Aspect Free. In: Briand, L., Williams, C. (eds.) Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3713, pp. 171–185. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Ontology reasoning in the shoq(d) description logic. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence IJCAI 2001, 199–204. Morgan Kaufmann 2001

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Schild, K.: A correspondence theory for terminological logics: preliminary report. In: Mylopoulos J., Reiter R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Sydney, Australia, August 24-30, 1991, pp. 466–471. Morgan Kaufmann (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Böhme, S., Lippmann, M.: Decidable Description Logics of Context with Rigid Roles. In: Lutz, C., Ranise, S.(eds.) Frontiers of Combining Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9322 pp. 17–32. Springer International Publishing, Berlin (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24246-0_2

  10. Schäfermeier, R., Krus, L., Paschke, A.: An Aspect-Oriented Extension to the OWL API - Specifying and Composing Views of OWL Ontologies using Ontology Aspects and Java Annotations. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, pp. 187–194 (2015). doi:10.5220/0005591601870194

  11. Del Vescovo, C., Klinov, P., Parsia, B., Sattler, U., Schneider, T., Tsarkov, D.: Syntactic vs. Semantic Locality: How Good Is a Cheap Approximation? In: Workshop on Modular Ontologies (WoMO) 2012, pp. 40–50 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paschke, A., Schäfermeier, R.: Aspect OntoMaven — Aspect-Oriented Ontology Development and Configuration With OntoMaven. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) 3rd Workshop on Formal Semantics for the Future Enterprise (FSFE 2015), Business Information Systems Workshops, vol. 228. Springer (2015). arXiv:1507.00212

  13. Horridge, M., Parsia, B., Sattler, U.: Laconic and Precise Justifications in OWL. In: Sheth, A., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K.(eds.) The Semantic Web - ISWC 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5318, pp. 323–338. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Oh, S., Yeom, H.Y., Ahn, J.: Cohesion and coupling metrics for ontology modules. Inf. Technol. Manag. 12(2), 81–96 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ensan, F., Du, W.: A semantic metrics suite for evaluating modular ontologies. Inf. Syst. 38(5), 745–770 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially supported by the InnoProfile Transfer project “Corporate Smart Content” funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph Schäfermeier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schäfermeier, R., Paschke, A. (2018). Aspect-Oriented Ontology Development. In: Nalepa, G., Baumeister, J. (eds) Synergies Between Knowledge Engineering and Software Engineering. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 626. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64161-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64161-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64160-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64161-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics