Skip to main content

Recognition of the Electrolaryngeal Speech: Comparison Between Human and Machine

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Text, Speech, and Dialogue (TSD 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10415))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Automatic recognition of an electrolaryngeal speech is usually a hard task due to the fact that all phonemes tend to be voiced. However, using a strong language model (LM) for continuous speech recognition task, we can achieve satisfactory recognition accuracy. On the other hand, the recognition of isolated words or phrase sentences containing only several words poses a problem, as in this case, the LM does not have a chance to properly support the recognition. At the same time, the recognition of short phrases has a great practical potential. In this paper, we would like to discuss poor performance of the electrolaryngeal speech automatic speech recognition (ASR), especially for isolated words. By comparing the results achieved by humans and the ASR system, we will attempt to show that even humans are unable to distinguish the identity of the word, differing only in voicing, always correctly. We describe three experiments: the one represents blind recognition, i.e., the ability to correctly recognize an isolated word selected from a vocabulary of more than a million words. The second experiment shows results achieved when there is some additional knowledge about the task, specifically, when the recognition vocabulary is reduced only to words that actually are included in the test. And the third test evaluates the ability to distinguish two similar words (differing only in voicing) for both the human and the ASR system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Scythe.

  2. 2.

    Goat.

  3. 3.

    Zerogram LM is the setting where all words from a fixed vocabulary have the same probability.

References

  1. Brown, D.H., Hilgers, F.J., Irish, J.C., Balm, A.J.: Postlaryngectomy voice rehabilitation: state of the art at the Millennium. World J. Surg. 27(7), 824–831 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fuchs, A.K., Morales-Cordovilla, J.A., Hagmller, M.: ASR for electro-laryngeal speech. In: 2013 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, pp. 234–238, December 2013

    Google Scholar 

  3. Github Kaldi: https://github.com/kaldi-asr/kaldi/tree/master/egs/wsj/s5

  4. Jůzová, M., Romportl, J., Tihelka, D.: Speech Corpus Preparation for Voice Banking of Laryngectomised Patients, pp. 282–290. Springer, Cham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kramp, B., Dommerich, S.: Tracheostomy cannulas and voice prosthesis. GMS Curr. Top. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 8, Doc05 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, H., Ng, M.L.: Electrolarynx in voice rehabilitation. Auris Nasus Larynx 34(3), 327–332 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Povey, D., Ghoshal, A., Boulianne, G., Burget, L., Glembek, O., Goel, N., Hannemann, M., Motlicek, P., Qian, Y., Schwarz, P., et al.: The Kaldi speech recognition toolkit. In: IEEE 2011 Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding. No. EPFL-CONF-192584. IEEE Signal Processing Society (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Radová, V., Psutka, J.: UWB-S01 corpus: a Czech read-speech corpus. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 2000, pp. 732–735 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stanislav, P., Psutka, J.V.: Influence of different phoneme mappings on the recognition accuracy of electrolaryngeal speech. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Processing and Multimedia Applications and Wireless Information Networks and Systems, SIGMAP (ICETE 2012), vol. 1, pp. 204–207 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Švec, J., Hoidekr, J., Soutner, D., Vavruška, J.: Web Text Data Mining for Building Large Scale Language Modelling Corpus, pp. 356–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work has been supported by the grant of the University of West Bohemia, project No. SGS-2016-039 and by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic project No. LO1506.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petr Stanislav .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stanislav, P., Psutka, J.V., Psutka, J. (2017). Recognition of the Electrolaryngeal Speech: Comparison Between Human and Machine. In: Ekštein, K., Matoušek, V. (eds) Text, Speech, and Dialogue. TSD 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10415. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64206-2_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64206-2_57

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64205-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64206-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics